The Importance Of The Great Law Of Peace

“Ideas about human rights have evolved over many centuries. But they achieved strong international support following the Holocaust and World War II. To protect future generations from a repeat of these horrors, the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948 and invited states to sign and ratify it”

A right is a concept in which a person has ownership of a metaphysical aspect pertaining to one’s self. That is, a right is a concept that first exist in the mind. Accordingly, where rights are concerned, it is similar to property; however, it cannot be taken away. A right first must be reasoned by the mind, where “the mind has the capacity to gain knowledge of some principles through reason alone” (Snyder, 1986, p. 727). The human mind is able to reason out certain concepts; of these concepts the idea of ownership over something comes into play. Further, the ability to reason out a concept such as right, or rather innate ownership of something is known. For example, the mind is able to reason out that there exists a

On a global political stand point there was a uniting of ideas and governments; what we know today as the United Nations (UN). One of the main ideas which the UN has grown up around is ‘The individual possess rights simply by virtue of being Human’ (The Universal Declaration of human rights); which was adopted by the general assembly in 10th December 1948. This statement is reflect in the core principles

The theme of war and peace has always been a problem in all periods of history and has affected the relationship between countries. The concern of the humankind for peace can be appreciated through that all religions, all religious scriptures, and organizations are helping to eradicate the wars. Yet the international community fully realized the supreme importance of the peace against the disagreements between nations after having experienced totals wars such as the 1st and 2nd world

The Human Development Report states the definition of human rights, as the rights possessed by all persons, by virtue of their common humanity, to live a life of freedom and dignity. They give all people moral claims in the behavior of individuals and the design of social arrangements and are universal, inalienable and indivisible. Human rights express our deepest commitments to ensuring that all persons are secure in their enjoyment of the goods and freedoms that are necessary for dignified living. Human rights belong to all people, and all people have equal status with respect to these rights (UNDP 2000). With human rights is the right to freedom.

The declaration has served as a model for many domestic constitutions, laws, regulations, and policies that are aimed at protecting fundamental human rights (Hannum 145). For the purpose of this paper, there are three essential aspects of the human rights theory outlined in the UDHR. First, Article 3 grants all humans the right to life stating, “everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of a person.” Second, Article 5 states that “no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” This right to safety alludes to the negative rights of a human, which grants the moral right that someone remain unharmed or “left alone.” Third, the UDHR argues in favor of the preservation of the human dignity. The document states that an increased awareness of “dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women… have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom” (The United Nations). The belief of human dignity within this document is strongly influenced by Kantian ethics, which believes that humans are their own ends, not the means to the end, and possess intrinsic value (Kant 36). In arguing for human dignity, the UDHR acknowledges the transcendent value of a human and his or her rights as more than just a body and more as a soul. Since publication,

1. (a) The post-WWII is marked as the rise of human rights. The universal human rights has become apparent in the international system, and has become the basis of drafting the UDHR. The universal human rights states “all humans are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” This phrase has guaranteed and protected the human rights of all human beings without any distinction. However, the universal notion of human rights has initiated controversy among many critiques. Some have argued that the Declaration was another way of Western imperialism because the idea has adopted western philosophical and political principles. This has instigated the rise of cultural relativism, which claimed that every culture has specific beliefs and perspectives

does not exist, we cannot simply “think” human rights into effect, active steps must be taken to ensure the protection and safety of worldwide human rights.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, envisaged and signed by 193 countries, accepts that every citizen in every country is entitled to every human right in the declaration. It is a matter of principle that such rights should be enforced with all the power invested in the government and in the justice system. We all deserve equal rights; yet in many countries, they are often flouted.

Notwithstanding the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, recognition of the “inalienable rights” of equality of “all members of the

The doctrine of human rights were created to protect every single human regardless of race, gender, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and other differences. It is based on human dignity and the belief that no one has the right to take this away from another human being. The doctrine states that every ‘man’ has inalienable rights of equality, but is this true? Are human rights universal? Whether human rights are universal has been debated for decades. There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background

The way of humanity to the modern understanding of human rights was long. The core element of a legal status of human and citizen are their rights, freedoms, and duties. Human rights are the fundamental rights and freedoms granted to all people, regardless of their nationality, gender, national or ethnic origin, race, religion, language or another status. Human rights are the social ability to act freely, to choose the type and extent of their behavior in order to satisfy diverse material and spiritual needs of the person by using certain social benefits within limits set by legislative acts. In the rights, freedoms, and responsibilities standards of behavior that are considered binding, useful, appropriate for normal functioning of society are not only fixed but also reveals the basic principles of relations between the state and the individual. Ensuring human rights and freedoms the state, in turn, requires certain behavior from the people that are formulated in the system of legal obligations. (Ishay, 2004) The most common in the legal literature classification criterion of the human and

The origin of the modern rights discourse is that of natural law dating back to antiquity. Plato was one of the first advocates for a universal

In accordance with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) it is proclaimed by the General Assembly that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights” (The United Nation [UN], 1948). But what are human rights? While they might be a substantially contemporary subject, the worlds first charter of human rights is now identified in 593 B.C when Cyrus the Great; freed the slaves, established racial equality and freedom to choose one’s own religion (Fleiner, 1999) With the emergence of the 18th century’s Age of Enlightenment, the concept of human rights was elevated with strong associations to the philosophy of liberalism, holding connotations of freedom after the abolition of slavery, serfdom and suppression in Europe and overseas (Von Mises, 2005). However when the United Nations drafted and constructed the Universal Declaration of Human rights, it was pledged “universal respect for and observance of all human rights and fundamental freedoms” (UN, 1948). The accentuation of universalism; applicable to all, is the foundation of the UDHR, thus the intrinsic dignity of every human being. Although on the contrary to universal innateness of human rights, is controversial criticisms of the international law’s universality, Makau Matua among many others deem it to be merely one more attempt by the West to perform similarly, modern day colonisation.

Accepted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is comprised of a preamble and thirty articles. Each article delineates a specific right that every human, either from the sake of being human and/or being part of the collective of humanity, is forever entitled to. On the flip side, the preamble is comprised of seven clauses that taken together accommodate the historical evolution, context, and reasoning behind the document’s inscription. Finally, at the end of the preamble is the declaration’s proclamation, whose inclusion solidifies the documents global significance.