The Importance Of Title 2

Over the past 29 plus years of working in this school district as a teacher, vice principal, STEM coach, instructional coach, and Title 1 coordinator, I would have to say my involvement in Title 1 has had the steepest learning curve. In all of my other jobs, I was able to learn how to be a teacher, coach or administrator through university coursework and classes offered for credential renewal. However, being a Title 1 coordinator this year has put me in the “shoes of a new learner,” much like my former students where I feel as though my head may explode with all of my new knowledge. I would like to pass along my new learnings about Title 1 and why it is so important to the White Pine County School District.

A major part of Title VII is the addition of the way that the Supreme Court infers violations of Title VII in regards to harassment. The term harassment was not even used in the original development of the law but the Supreme Court has set precedent when it comes to employees being made to work in a hostile work environment. According to the Supreme Court, the law has been broken when an employer creates an environment that alters the terms of the conditions of the employment contract.

Imagine getting online, only to find out that you can 't access your favorite website. It could be Instagram, Tumblr, or even Youtube, a website for uploading videos. After getting off the phone with your internet provider, they tell you that you need to pay to access your favorite website. Internet providers want it to be set up that way. Their has been an ongoing debate about net neutrality between the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and internet providers. Net neutrality is fighting again internet providers blocking content.

The Title IX law states that: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” (Wikipedia) In 1964, although the Civil Right Act has been designed to punish discrimination in almost all field on account of sex, religion, race, etc., it did not realize there is discrimination in public education too until 1972. And the Title IX was introduced by congress by senator Birch Bayh of Indiana in 1971. It seems to me that discrimination is an insult to humanity, an insult all the values that bring progress and harmony to

Can you imagine living in a time where your friend, sister, or even yourself could legally be kept from attending a school, participating in a sport, or being a student in a classroom, because of being a woman? Before 1972 and the passage of Title IX, this was an everyday occurrence in the United States. Title IX, which has been a successful attempt at obtaining equal rights for women and men in education systems, has been a source of controversy ever since the passing of the clause. As discussed in an article from The United States Department of Justice, "Overview of Title IX," the clause was made to stop the flow of government money that was funding discriminatory practices in U.S. schools. The act covers aspects of science, sports, standardized

Attention Getter: When you go online you have certain expectations. You expect to be connected to whatever website you want. You expect that your cable or phone company isn’t messing with the data and is connecting you to all websites, applications and content you choose. You expect to be in control of your internet experience. When you use the internet you expect Net Neutrality.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that no person shall be discriminated against due to national origin under any program receiving Federal finance assistance. Title VI claims mirror Equal Protection claims and provide no more protection than the Equal Protection clause does. Similar to Equal Protection, Title VI only covers intentional discrimination. Title VI does not provide a remedy for disparate impact claims and so only intentional policies that directly discriminate are subject to Title VI. For a plaintiff to prove a Title IV claim there is a multistep process. The first step is the Plaintiff must present a prima facie case of discrimination; the second step is the defendant must articulate a legitimate and nondiscriminatory reason for the alleged action, and finally the plaintiff has an opportunity to prove that the reason provided by the defendant was not the real reason for the action. In order

In the IEEE CTN issue of June 2014, It was noted that “evolution and technological innovation in communication systems, digital media, and user behavior may challenge Net Neutrality principles and question if or how Net Neutrality can be sustained in a new word of data-hungry applications such as on-demand video, online gaming, and music streaming” (IEEE, 2014). In the same CTN issue, specific Net Neutrality principles included, among others, no connection blocking, bandwidth transparency, universal connectivity, and best effort

When ISPs were attempting to take away the FCC’s regulations millions of Americans issued complaints with the FCC in an attempt to keep their freedom and it was successful for the time. Now however many members of Congress in the GOP are attempting to undo the very protections that millions of Americans fought for. In order to allow for the best protection of the internet, and for it to remain open and free, the United States needs to reclassify broadband to Telecommunication Services so the FCC can regulate and protect the internet from those who would seek to harm it. Senator you once stated: “My question about everything I do is, does it make our country stronger?” and I assure you that this will not only make the country stronger but allow for a major instrument of freedom to remain an instrument of freedom. I want to thank you for taking the time out of your very important and busy schedule to read this and hope that you will honor the wishes of millions of

The biggest concern is that the internet will become pay-to-play technology with two tiers: one that has speedy service and one that doesn’t. The high-speed lane would be occupied by big internet and media companies, and affluent households. For everyone else there would be the slow lane.

Claim of Policy: The United States Federal Communications Commission should not repeal the current net neutrality rules.

Net Neutrality is essential to our everyday lives, and it is perilously close to being repealed on December 14th by the FCC; but if more people take a stand in support of Net Neutrality, we can preserve the free internet. Net Neutrality needs to be saved because it protects free speech, free trade of information and services, and the privacy of our data. This is an issue that concerns all citizens regardless of political affiliation, but lawmakers have made it a fight between the two parties. Most people did not care about Net Neutrality or even know what it is until fairly recently, but recent events regarding it's likely repeal have turned the public’s attention towards it.

The concept of network neutrality (more commonly referred to as net neutrality) has been a fixture of debates over United States telecommunications policy throughout the first decade of the twenty-first century. Based upon the principle that internet access should not be altered or restricted by the Internet Service Provider (ISP) one chooses to use, it has come to represent the hopes of those who believe that the internet still has the potential to radically transform the way in which we interact with both people and information, in the face of the commercial interests of ISPs, who argue that in order to sustain a competitive marketplace for internet provision, they must be allowed to differentiate their services. Whilst this debate has

Throughout the last decade, the idea of Net Neutrality has been the topic of many debates. Net Neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers should not be allowed to block their users from any content regardless of its source. The Debate is still continuing in 2017 with the F.C.C planning to repeal Net Neutrality and allow internet providers to completely regulate what their users can see and charge the users extra for “luxuries” such as social media, messaging, email, and music. There are two sides of this argument, one side believes that Net Neutrality should be taken away, while others believe that it is unfair for the Internet providers to have the right to take away the access to any content. Internet providers should not be allowed to control what content one can view when surfing the internet.

These lanes will be beneficial to an individual company but is not good for customers who will have deal with inconsistencies (The Economist). Net Neutrality proposes a consumer-happy approach which is the main concern for network owners.