The Importance of Good Character Essay

“Can We Teach Character? An Aristotelian Answer” by Edwin M. Hartman is an incredibly well written article on whether, as the title states, character can be taught. I will attempt to critique this article and illustrate points that may have been excluded, but the article is extremely well rounded. The purpose of the article is to determine whether teaching ethics is worth the time taken, whether students will actually act better as a result. Hartman translates Aristotle’s thoughts well, and overall it is a beautiful piece of writing.

Character is the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual, though morality is subjective, in today’s society it is predominantly agreed upon that someone who is of good character has certain qualities that contribute to their decision making, trustworthiness, and intelligence. I previously mentioned prudence, which is the ability to govern oneself by the use of reason to make good judgements that allow you to avoid troublesome situations, which allows one to face the adversities of life while only encountering necessary risks. This is the ultimate show of genuine character, those who can judge for themselves and aren’t afraid to admit their faults, or

Character is defined as one’s moral qualities. I have very high expectations for my character, and I hold myself to them. Every time a person isn't the nicest to me or someone else, I remind myself not to stoop to their level. I tell myself, “Treat others how you would want to be treated.” I will always treat myself and everyone around me with respect, courtesy, and kindness.

There are many Bible verses that relate to business character. Many of them speak of honesty and integrity in business actions. Character is defined as the combination of a person’s ethical and moral qualities, and it is shown through the choices we make. Therefore, as a business owner or decision maker, one needs to consider the impacts the decision may have on others and the community and not be hasty in making the quick decision that may have negative impacts in the future.

Intelligence, wit, judgment, and the other talents of the mind, however they may be named, or courage, resolution, perseverance, as qualities of temperament, are undoubtedly good and desirable in many respects; but these gifts of nature may also become extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them, and which, therefore, constitutes what is called character, is not good.

I think that good character is very important in life because it shows who you are as a person, how you carry yourself as a person and how you treat other people. Having good character is what I believe you need to be successful in life, having good character can cause you to get a good job, possibly getting a raise in your job, making friends and just doing the right thing in general.

Business leaders among a wide range of industries agree that an organization’s success is determined by attracting and retaining a quality workforce. However, many organization’s hire employees based on a certain set of skills the employees possess, or acquaintances they have within the organization. Many organizations fail to consider if the prospective employee fits the organizational culture. In the case of Two Tough Calls, the Program Manager, Susan, was faced with a managerial dilemma; retain or terminate two underachieving employees.

Defined “Character" at a level of understanding. Good character consists of understanding, caring about, and acting upon core ethical values by to a young child you must learn to simplify to their terms.

period. Both of these individuals have great interviews and are hired. They both start with the company

These six pillars of character are trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring and citizenship. Particularly, a person is said to be trustworthy when he or she has integrity, keeps promises and loyal. An ethical person knows how to respect other people and their ideas. Moreover, he or she also takes accountability of his own words, actions and attitudes (Josephson Institute, 2010). He is also

I would choose candidate 2 because candidate 2 displays professionalism even though he or she may not have that much experience. In the working world, professionalism is a trait most employers look for and within professionalism, workplace ethics plays a key role. Work place ethics can be defined as the set of behaviors an employee must display within their professional setting. Some of the characteristics include but are not limited to: attitude, personality, honesty, organization, appearance, etc. One key characteristic every manager tends to focus on is honesty and integrity in the workplace. If an employee lies to the manager saying he had finished a task then then the manager would put his or her complete trust in the employee and believe that the task is finished even though the employee was probably lying.

Other features of an individual having good character are honesty, integrity and ethical behavior. These characteristics are brought about through being a participant of a sport because when an athlete recognizes they are in the wrong during game play, they develop the importance of honesty. (i.e. In baseball/softball: a

Sarah is in a very difficult situation. I think Sarah should have rejected the other interviewee because she promised Hillary. However, now Sarah knew who is better for her business, therefore; she should hire Tina for several reasons. The first reason is that Tina is better than Hillary in this position and that would achieve the reason why Sarah is hiring. The second reason is Tina would bring in clients to the business and that would increase the business. I know the decision is very difficult for Sarah to take, but she should help her business and find the best person.

How I hire the right people every time an enthusiast wrote, the thing to look for from the applicants: “Hire for attitude, train for skill.” That’s the one craze in recruiting job candidates, and it can be sickened most of the time. Attitude is easy to fake by many. Someone can walk into an interview bubbling with enthusiasm, full of bright questions and observations.

I agree with Danny’s philosophy to only hire people that he sees being one of the top three workers in their role. If they cannot even rise to be part of the top three at any point in their career there, what is the point in even hiring them? Why hire a worker that you feel is at best mediocre? Workers should be hired when the expectation for their performance exceeds that of all other workers in the company. Danny also talks about the concept of a “whelming” candidate. See, with an overwhelmingly qualified candidate you know that they will excel at their job and will do great things in their role. With an underwhelmingly qualified candidate they will either quit or be fired for underperforming. The issue with a “whelming” candidate is that they are completely average. They won’t go on to excel in their role, they won’t do great things, but they also avoid underperforming to the point of demoting or firing them. They are simply dead weight, and the biggest problem is they are often only uncovered by the time they have been working in their position for quite a while already.