Native Americans have been working unremittingly for sovereignty over their own affairs since the very beginning of Euro-American contact. The twentieth century in particular was a progressive time for Native Americans as they continued to fight for sovereignty over their own affairs and Historians have taken note of this. Most historians of Native Americans have given a substantial amount of attention to the Indian Civil Rights Act (ICRA). Many historians concur that the ICRA was a fundamental tool for Natives to not only gain autonomy in a progressively bellicose society, but equally between themselves. After acknowledging that Indian Nations were not invited to the Constitutional Convention and that the United States Constitution was never …show more content…
Because of this, the evidence has lead to multiple explanations and evaluations, which at times, are absolutely conflicting to each other. This paper contends that, due to the lenses in which some historians look to try and decipher the effectiveness of the ICRA, many have failed to adequately foreground that the ICRA is ineffective. These lenses have prompted some historians to go great lengths to fortify an earlier discernment of the ICRA as a constructive and progressive act whereas other historians go on to argue for a re-interpretation of the past all together. This paper will show how these various historians are in conversation with each other, but still fail to reach the same …show more content…
The ICRA helped create a conversation about the need for protection of individual rights not only from the federal government, but also tribal councils. This act also facilitated a bigger discussion that Native Americans were going to endure and combat any assimilation policies that the federal government purposed. During the nineteenth century, there was a heavy push by reformers to persuade the federal government to take an even more aggressive approach toward assimilating Native Americans. A prominent policy during the nineteenth century was allotment. At a basic level, allotment attempted to force Native Americans to assimilate. At the very foundation of allotment was the Dawes act which had an underlying assumption that Native Americans wanted to be farmers amongst other jobs that would help compulsorily usher Natives into the larger American society. Francis Prucha, for example, author of the book Americanizing the American Indians, takes a great deal of time in talking about the attitudes towards Indians and federal policy prior to the twentieth century. He relies heavily on the evidences of speeches, articles, and pamphlets written by reformers who worked diligently to sway federal Indian policy to forcibly assimilate Indians. In his book, Prucha submits that reformers had three main goals. The first goal focused on using allotment to break
The history and the establishment of various Indian tribes in America took the path of revolution by human civil rights institutions. The Indian American citizen had to form a movement whose main aim was demand for their rights from the Native Americans and the government by sorting for cultural independent protection, advocating of their human rights and restoration of economic rights. Independence of the human race do not always come as an easy task but is involves a sequence of efforts against the violation of rights by their native colonies.
American Indians have been discriminated against since the Europeans came to North America. They were driven from their homes and forced to surrender their land. They tried to build an alliance with France during the Revolutionary war, but ultimately they were defeated by the English. From then on, they were referred to as “savages”. The Proclamation of 1763 tried to separate the Native American land from the American colonial land. In the end, the American Indians lost their land and were forced to occupy smaller land areas, referred to as reservations, which were given to them through treaties. In 1979, a report from America’s Compliance with Human Rights Accords stated that
The Native Americans have come across long journey of difficult times since the occupation of their land by European settlers. There are still two sides of a coin- a world of civilization and a world of underdeveloped society in this one country- USA. The paradox is that the constitution which seems to be a model of democracy to many nations of the world lacks a lot for not acting accordingly. Those organized and unorganized struggles of Native Americans were challenged by the heavily armed white majority settlers. This history is among the worst American experience because of the massacre and the violation against human right. In order to be heard, they protest, occupy land, and write books. The Native Americans have raised several
The Dawes Act of 1887 began the process of allotment. By trying to force Native Americans to become farmers, the federal government cast many groups into poverty. The land which the United States held in trust for Indians was usually not choice farmland. Those trying to make a living off the inhospitable lands of the West found little success. During the interwar period of the early twentieth century, the government made new efforts to alleviate Indians’ position as a marginalized group. Over 10,000 Native Americans volunteered and served with distinction in the armed forces during World War I. In recognition of their efforts, Congress passed the Indian Citizenship Act in 1924, making all American Indians United States citizens.
Before reading Joel Spring’s text, Deculturalization and the Struggle for Equality, I assumed by the late 1800s that Native Americans would be allowed to be citizens in the United States. So I was shocked to discover that the first Native Americans were not granted citizenship until 1901. Unfortunately, the only Native Americans to receive citizenship at the time were ones were considered civilized because they adopted European culture (Spring, 2016). It is astonishing to me that our government forced Native Americans to give up their culture and adopt ours if they
During the end of the nineteenth century, the United States had formed policies which reduced land allotted to Native Americans. By enforcing these laws as well as Anglo-American ideals, the United States compromised indigenous people’s culture and ability to thrive in its society.
From its birth, America was a place of inequality and privilege. Since Columbus 's arrival and up until present day, Native American tribes have been victim of white men 's persecution and tyranny. This was first expressed in the 1800’s, when Native Americans were driven off their land and forced to embark on the Trail of Tears, and again during the Western American- Indian War where white Americans massacred millions of Native Americans in hatred. Today, much of the Indian Territory that was once a refuge for Native Americans has since been taken over by white men, and the major tribes that once called these reservations home are all but gone. These events show the discrimination and oppression the Native Americans faced. They were, and continue to be, pushed onto reservations,
“The Indian presence precipitated the formation of an American identity” (Axtell 992). Ostracized by numerous citizens of the United States today, this quote epitomizes Axtell’s beliefs of the Indians contributing to our society. Unfortunately, Native Americans’ roles in history are often categorized as insignificant or trivial, when in actuality the Indians contributed greatly to Colonial America, in ways the ordinary person would have never deliberated. James Axtell discusses these ways, as well as what Colonial America may have looked like without the Indians’ presence. Throughout his article, his thesis stands clear by his persistence of alteration the Native Americans had on our nation. James Axtell’s bias delightfully enhances his thesis, he provides a copious amount of evidence establishing how Native Americans contributed critically to the Colonial culture, and he considers America as exceptional – largely due to the Native Americans.
It wasn’t until 1924 which Native Americans were able to become citizens of the United States. Prior to then, the Natives were underestimated and were not fully granted nor treated the freedom they deserved. The Natives involvement during WWI somehow proved to the federal government that they were capable as being a citizen and thusly, pushed Congress to permit the Meriam Survey. In the report of 1928, it showed the shocking details that the Natives had to live in which became the purpose for reform. In 1934, the Indian Reorganization Act was established which abolished the Dawes Act and granted them the ability to hold administrative positions within the government; however, was still undermined by many of the states and believed that the Act was in some ways ‘unconstitutional’.
The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, also known as the Wheeler Howard Act or the IRA, had a major impact on the everyday lives of Native American Tribes that were scattered across the United states. The Indian Reorganization Act provided the means and tools for tribes to form their own governments and constitutions. The IRA stopped the general allotment act that was put into effect by the Dawes of 1887. The Indian Reorganization Act granted the Secretary of Interior a tremendous amount of power over Native American affairs ranging from land, livestock, employment, government, etc. According to the reorganization plan, after a tribe or nation voted to accept the IRA, it would draw up a constitution and bylaws, submit it to a referendum,
Native Americans have felt distress from societal and governmental interactions for hundreds of years. American Indian protests against these pressures date back to the colonial period. Broken treaties, removal policies, acculturation, and assimilation have scarred the indigenous societies of the United States. These policies and the continued oppression of the native communities produced an atmosphere of heightened tension. Governmental pressure for assimilation and their apparent aim to destroy cultures, communities, and identities through policies gave the native people a reason to fight. The unanticipated consequence was the subsequent creation of a pan-American Indian identity
After conceding that Indian nations were neither summoned or encouraged to be a part of the Constitutional Convention and that the United States Constitution had never been ratified to include them, Native Americans held that the Constitution’s protections and liberties did not pertain to tribal governments. Native Americans had to formulate a way to defend themselves from any lawmaking power that desired to infringe on their basic rights. This prompted Native Americans to push for the passage of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968. Its intention was to protect themselves from both the federal government and tribal governments. Along with the passage of the ICRA, the 1960’s saw an increase in Native American Migration. Native migration to urban areas prompted Native
Many years before Christopher Columbus stumbled upon America, there were Indians who declared America their home. Indians had originated tribal areas, similar to states and they resided under their own laws and government. Native Americans fought a long and bloody battle to protect their land and defend their families. Some Indians were also captured as slaves by Europeans and some Indians also fought in American wars to defend America, but it took decades for them to receive any type of recognition or equality. In 1803, Thomas Jefferson was the first president to acknowledge tribal governments. Native American Casus stated, “The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized tribal sovereignty in court decisions for more than 150 years. In 1831,
Throughout the semester we have read several articles about none other than American Indians and their history. We have learned that Native American tribal governments are an integral part of the political fabric of the United States. As the Supreme Court of the United States determined in its 1831 decision in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (5 Peters) tribal governments are not states in a constitutional sense, neither are they foreign states, at least for purposes of Article III original jurisdiction. Instead, they are domestic dependent nations, with many sovereign powers maintained from the pre-contact period. As tribal governments have grown in political and economic power, the Supreme Court.
Talking Back to Civilization , edited by Frederick E. Hoxie, is a compilation of excerpts from speeches, articles, and texts written by various American Indian authors and scholars from the 1890s to the 1920s. As a whole, the pieces provide a rough testimony of the American Indian during a period when conflict over land and resources, cultural stereotypes, and national policies caused tensions between Native American Indians and Euro-American reformers. This paper will attempt to sum up the plight of the American Indian during this period in American history.