The Indian Constitution

The second section is Articles 12 to Article 17. It constitutes the privileges of the person in common and political society. Article 18 through Article 21 is the third section.This section is focused on spiritual. public, and political freedoms such as freedom of religion, expression and press. The fourth segment is the Articles 22 through Article 27 which sets out social, economical, and social rights. The last three articles of the Declaration give the pediment which ties the structure together.

Together these legislations formed the fundamental rights and freedom of an individual. These affect the rights of everyday life of an individual including what they can say and do, their beliefs, right not to be tortured and right to a

In any given constitution a nation, the recording of bills of rights has been a gradual process. All the aspects of life in society were done with respect to the law. The society requires being guided by certain principles and guidelines that would define and evaluate each and every aspect of their lives. To ensure that the entire society remained focused and concentrated in the given policies and guidelines, they recorded in the constitution and made available to each and every member of the society for the purpose of doing reviews. The action of the people would be judged in accordance with the constitution. With society running several errands towards the realization of development, many fields had to be covered. Criteria for the operation of the people would require significant efforts to accomplish the set objectives. Violations in the society occur either due to misunderstanding or lack of awareness of the rights present in the constitution. Any form of violation is evaluated by the appropriate form of punishment offered. (Hand, 1965)

The Constitution itself not only established a strong national government, but also established fundamental laws, along with the basic rights of citizens.

This issue coincides with the second issue highlighted in the document, equality before the law. This issue was mentioned in the fourth, fifth and sixth article. “Law can only prohibit such actions as are hurtful to society” . The last issue to be identified is taxation. The articles that include taxation are the thirteenth and the fourteenth.

The first provision I took notice of was outlined in section two titled The Rights of Individuals. This section mirrors the United States Constitution in granting inalienable rights to all persons, recognizing that all people are born free and equal.

The shared passion of visionaries, thinkers, and writers profoundly influence society in the modern world and hold in their hands the ability to craft a better future. They inspire new ,, and sometimes even revolution. Two documents of the 18th century, The Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights of man established and angle for which we view human rights, liberties, and human freedoms. While the underlying motivations of the declarations each have a distinct purpose, the intent to establish universal human rights parallel and often mimic one another in language and meaning. Both documents however have interesting contradictions and inconsistences with regards to whom the liberties should apply, from whom the authority is derived and the motivations behind the drafting of each respective declaration.

THE DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS OF MEN AND OF CITIZENS - AN ANALYSIS IN FIVE PARTS

It may also include a charter of fundamental rights. And fundamental and inalienable and inviolable right. In other words, the constitution guarantees everyone the respect of the rights: it is necessary to guarantee the fundamental rights of citizens. It poses, for example, the principle of the equality of citizens, the universal suffrage ( Voting rights granted to all citizens of age) the source of legitimacy and allows everyone to have his case heard by an independent tribunal. A constitution is an instrument that must fights against arbitrariness by allowing all citizens freedom. Thus violating the freedom of people right is legitimately unacceptable level of government action although politics

Together these legislations form the fundamental rights and freedom of an individual. These affect the rights of every day life of an individual including what they can say and do, their beliefs, right not to be tortured and right for a fair trial. These rights have limits to ensure that other peoples rights are

The Indian Act was first proposed in 1876. The Indian Act was mainly used as a way for the federal government to control aspects of Native American lives. During the 1880’s the federal government told Indian families that if they wanted their children to have an education, it was to be done under them. These institutions would be known as Residential Schools. Residential Schools were not good for the Native Americans due to the education being taught was there to “take away” the Indian within the children, in other words, to make them act like they are not Indian.

The focus of this paper vis-à-vis the book Constitutional Café by Christopher Phillips will be tenth chapter, which is titled Rights and Responsibilities. This chapter of the book focuses what are defined and codified as rights, what implications both rights and responsibilities hold when speaking of the Constitution and how the Constitutional framework surrounding these two topics has evolved since the Revolution. The two terms sound easy enough to define and assess but the topics become quite muddled when considering what the clauses mean and how they've played out in the past since their inception (Philips, 2012).

Section 7 as stated by the Charter states that, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice” (Constitution Act, 1982, s 7). Furthermore,

The Indian Act was enacted in 1867 by the Parliament of Canada. The Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development administered the act. The act defines who an “Indian” is and the legal rights of the Aboriginal people in Canada. Regulation of the economic system between aboriginal people and the government of Canada is included in the Indian Act. It also includes the power the ministers have on the aboriginal people including children and disabled Aboriginals. If the laws are not obeyed, the punishment is written in the act. The Indian Act was influenced by the legislative foundation of the Royal Proclamation, 1763, which recognized Aboriginals as a distinct political unit (Residential schools). The Royal Proclamation, 1763, thought that it was their duty to protect the Aboriginal people from the Canadian society. The Royal Proclamation, 1763, had the responsibility for Aboriginal affairs in Canada with British imperial authorities. However, by the mid-1800s Britain began to transfer this responsibility to Canadian colonies. Then the Canadian authorities passed the First Indian Act. Over the years many amendments have been made to the Indian Act.The Indian act passed out a law that any children under the ages of 16 had to study at Residential schools (Residential schools), the children there were physically abused, especially girls. (Churchill, 55-56). The Indian act is significant today because on June, 11 2008, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, on behalf of the

Most of Criminal Procedure collections include a discussion of the specific way of protections in the Bill of Rights it have become applicable as limitations to the state power. They make a minimum because the text of the Human Rights Declaration is far from clear that the various protections therein were intended as state power limitations and because the jurisprudence reveals a good deal on constitutional developments. Commentators agree that the bill was in the origin of man to limit federal, not state power.