The Indian Constitution

There are certain principles in the constitution that the US Supreme court should rely on when it comes to defining the limits of state and federal authority. To define these limits concepts such as implied powers, checks and balances, separation of powers and limited government will be discussed along with the benefit that comes with their implementation in our government. As these concepts are defined along with their implementation into the government I hope to give the reader a firm understanding of these concepts individual importance within the constitution and society.

“Both United States and India are based on federalism in their political structure. US became a Federal Republic State by promulgating its constitution in the year1789; whereas India became a Socialist, Sovereign, Secular, Democratic Republic by formally launching its constitution only in the year 1950.Thereby both countries attained dominion status in which a number of smaller states got affiliated forming a union with a strong central government that came to be called as Federal Government in the US and Central Government in India. Thus both states became Federal Republics. (1)”

Article three is all about The Judiciary. Section one is about Judicial Power Vested. Section two is about Scope of Judicial Power. Section three is about Treason.

The fourth provision I found was Article VI, The Judiciary. This article gives the state judicial power. Article six is comprised of six sections outlining judicial power, the Supreme Court, the appointment of justices and judges as well as qualifications for appointment to the office. Article VI also goes on to outline retirement, removal, and discipline of judges and justices as well as the administration of the state courts.

The judiciary system is defined by Article III in the Constitution and Section 2 describes the powers and limitations that court system has. The purpose of the judiciary is to handle interpretations of the laws created by the constitution and any disputes that arises between parties, cases may be brought to the court, the court cannot create cases. There are 3 levels in the court system, which is true for the state judiciary as well as the Federal level. The two lower levels attempt resolve issues while lessoning the burden on the supreme courts. The lowest level of court is the district court aka trial courts,

I believe the check of “JUDICIARY is check on LEGISLATIVE through its authority to review all laws and determine their constitutionality.” Has been most proving being hat almost every day the Supreme Court decides wether or not things are Constitutional or not.

The Indian Act was first proposed in 1876. The Indian Act was mainly used as a way for the federal government to control aspects of Native American lives. During the 1880’s the federal government told Indian families that if they wanted their children to have an education, it was to be done under them. These institutions would be known as Residential Schools. Residential Schools were not good for the Native Americans due to the education being taught was there to “take away” the Indian within the children, in other words, to make them act like they are not Indian.

establish” (Criminal Courts, 94). While the supreme court has the highest power in the country, it

The United States Constitution is filled to the brim with ambiguous language that people continue to debate the meaning of. There is one thing, however, the document makes very clear: the legislature legislates and the executive executes. Claims that President Obama has abused his power by passing DACA and DAPA completely ignore this fact. In reality, the president, as head of the executive branch, absolutely has the power to use prosecutorial discretion in how he or she executes the laws.

The Judiciary Act organized the first federal court system which consisted of a Supreme Court with six justices, a district court in every state, and three appeals courts. Congress approved a bill of rights to strengthen popular support for the new government. The bill of rights ensured that national government could not infringe on the right to trial by jury. In an effort to reassure Antifederalists that the powers of the new government was limited, the tenth amendment “reserved to the States respectively or to the people” all powers not specifically placed in the

Keywords: Judiciary System, Constitution, Article III, Supreme Court, Jurisdiction, Congress, Judicial Branch, Federal Court, State Court, Local Court

There could be instances where a judge interprets a statute to mean something different than the governing body intended, moreover, the

His Honour reasons that if the Commonwealth’s argument was upheld, there would be a drastic encroachment onto many areas of state law making power. Such areas could include healthcare and education, as many of these areas are becoming, if not already incorporated. This contention seems logical. There are very few areas of law that have not been incorporated in some manner already, and with state governments often outsourcing or privatising to fund projects, there would be almost limitless scope to the commonwealth’s law making abilities under the corporations power. Additionally, with the High Court’s broad interpretation to the meaning of “trading corporation” in s.51(xx) by using the “object of command” test , it would be very easy for the federal parliament to further extend its

The court’s interpretation of the law is the key aspect of this case as it will determine whether the companies’ activities are legal or

As a result of federalism, whereby government system of the United States has generated an overlap of power as a result of delegating some powers to the federal government and others to the state to exercise, there has therefore been a conflict in the undertaking of criminal justice in courts. Article six of the United States constitution contains a supremacy clause that pronounces the role of judges in every state as bound by the constitution (Banks, 34). This is however subject to different interpretation because when these laws interfere with the laws of the congress, the act of congress is deemed supreme even though the latter is in pursuance of the constitution, it must conform to the laws of congress. For instance, the United States district courts have jurisdiction to hear federal cases and deciding the constitutionality of federal laws. However the constitution gives powers to the congress to control and determine the cases to