The history of the Indian subcontinent is one of the longest and most debated histories to date, going back as far as 500,000 to 200,000 years. The study of history will forever be one of importance, as through learning about the past, we shape the future. India, as a nation, is a modern phenomenon and has built itself on its long history debatable Aryan roots. How an Aryan identity came to be from the ancient Indian civilization of Harappa is a question of the history and where this history was founded. Indian history was interpreted through a British lens, which affected how the historical data was portrayed to the rest of the modern world. The British interpretation of Indian history developed an ‘Aryan Debate’ that analyzed how the British determined who was Aryan, how language and race interact, and how the Rig Veda was interpreted. Additionally, the debate considers how preconceived concepts of race were factored into the analysis of evidence, how the concept of an Indian caste system was created, and how it affects India today.
The debate over how Aryans came to be in India, which is comprised of two main theories, is one of the most widely debated topics of Indian history. Both of the theories cannot be correct, however, both are entirely plausible. The main question of the debate is whether the Aryans have internal or external origins in India. The more widely accepted belief, referred to as the ‘immigrant Aryan’ position or the ‘standard view’, believes that the
As a first generation Indian-American, I am no stranger to being a part of a distinct community while observing two unique cultures. Traveling to India exposed me to a dynamic population with rich diversity comprising of numerous languages and differing religions. Though these individuals may have had differing customs from their neighbors, there were similar ambitions to conquer grinding poverty. This poverty can be clearly noticed by seeing citizens sleeping on floors of a railway station, or the lack of air conditioning in searing hot weather. The frailty and mortality of the human condition was starkly visible in India. As a fellow human, I was humbled not only by the lack of privilege and opportunity of many citizens, but also by their
When most of us think of the great Indians of the last century, we think of a thin, well-defined figure standing stern and serious. When we think of a modern Indian, we
o. Now today, India is made up of multiple identities, but “if your allegiance is to India, then you are Indian”( Wood, 245).
The caste system has been extremely stable in India for over two thousand years. It is only since the more modern, independent state of India was formed that the system has come under any scrutiny at all. It is presently outlawed, but many of the practices, attitudes and traditions remain ingrained in Hindu society (University of Wyoming, 1997).
Western Scholars began to discover the similarities of the two religions in the late 18th century. Further research into the links of the two cultures quickly resulted in the “Aryan invasion theory”, and the “Aryan migration theory”. Scholars
The manifestation of racist ideological representations of indianess will be highlighted by analyzing the Van der
1~ Even if the indias change in looks, in the hearts they are still savages
Removed Cherokees initially settled near Tahlequah, Oklahoma. When signing the Treaty of New Echota in 1835 Major Ridge said "I have signed my death warrant." The resulting political turmoil led to the killings of Major Ridge, John Ridge, and Elias Boudinot; of the leaders of the Treaty Party, only Stand Watie escaped death.[47][48][49] The population of the Cherokee Nation eventually rebounded, and today the Cherokees are the largest American Indian group in the United States.[50]
Thind based his case on the Aryan theory of the Hindu caste system. The Aryans were a group of invaders who were believed to have come to India around 1500 BCE. The Vedas are Hindu religious texts that describe the caste system, placing the descents of the Aryan people, who were fair-skinned and blue-eyed, at the highest levels of the system. As a high caste Hindu, Thind argued that he shared common ancestry with European peoples and could therefore be considered “white”. In his self-published account of his naturalization case, Ghadiali expressed puzzlement regarding the state’s claim that he was non-white given that all he was able to see when he looked at himself was white. The title of Munshi’s article about the case which is taken from a quotation of Ghadiali, “You will see my family became so American”, shows how closely Ghadiali associated being American with being white. The connection between America and whiteness is a prevalent one that lingers still and I contend that this is in part due to the cyclical self-exclusion of minorities such as Thind and Ghadiali who sought to assimilate through the assertion of whiteness, which only resulted in the further exclusion of
One question I have on the topic of Britain’s reign over India is why Indians were discriminated against. On page 42, a young British girl says to Vidya at the airport, “Don’t touch me, blackie! Look where you’re going, you crow!” On page 38 Vidya’s father scoffs sarcastically, “Only white people have the brains to be officers. We are too stupid, of course.” Why did Britain hate the citizens of the country they had taken over? Was it to keep them in line, to say if they dare go against them the discrimination would get worse? If the British thought the Indians were so horrible, why did they take over their country, take their resources and take volunteers to fight on their side of the war? It made no sense that Britain would occupy their country
Once there was a great and mighty Indian Chief named Sosqatucha that ruled all of the land from the east to the west. One day there was a tribe member that lived in the same ancient city as the Indian Chief, that was walking around the city saying words that rhymed and would write the words that he said on a piece of paper. One of the Chief’s men told him about the man and he had the man brought to his Temple with his hands bound with rope.
To start with let begin with the foundation of the paper and to start will begin with the past history of Asian Indians American which include groups like the Bangladesh, Pakistan, India fall under the term Asian Indians (Pavri, 2014). The earliest sign of many Asian Indians or Asian Indians
Pre-existent cultures were different than that of the Indo-European migrants because the migrants who were known as the Aryans were nomadic and pastoral peoples. Aryans arrived in India around 1500 B.C.E.; upon their arrival, they started a pastoral economy consisting of sheep, horses, cattle, and several other animals. Meanwhile, the pre-existing people of India were farmers. The Aryans skin tone was different than that of the Dravidians. The Aryans form of transportation was rather advanced for their time because they made use of horses to transport themselves along with carts and wagons to transport goods. Religious differences were focused on the fact that the Aryans primarily relied on the memorization of hymns, gods of war, and morality.
Before we proceed further with the analysis of the construction of the Aryan civilization, it is important for us to understand the sources of Hindu Myths and the very texts from which history is gleaned.
The objective of this report is to delve into the importance and study the major features of the Vedic Age and its contribution to today’s world.