The Influence Of Electoral Voting

Linkage institutions can be defined as institutions that connect citizens with the government. Examples of linkage institutions include elections, political parties, interest groups, and the media. Elections specifically are supposed to encourage public participation in the selection of governmental officials. Unfortunately, low voter turnout has proved that elections are an imperfect linkage institution. Elections depend on voters to be successful, and some factors that relate to the likelihood of voting include age, education, and race. Although some people underestimate the power of the vote, voter turnout is

Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, yet Donald Trump is president because he won the Electoral College. The Electoral College is the system that the United States of America uses to elect the president and vice president. A couple of groups have a problem with how the Electoral College currently operates with people like Barbara Boxer, a California Senator, stating that “94% of campaigning by the presidential candidates in 2016 took place in 12 states. That was it. Two-thirds of these general election campaign events took place in 6 states.” (Congressional Digest, page 21). The idea that the Electoral College and presidential elections is ignoring the majority of the states has spurred different groups to attempt to reform the Electoral

Voting is the chance to contribute to the political process, and the framework was made to work best when everybody partakes. Along these lines, utilizing your entitlement to vote is not only an expansion to the voter turnout insights distributed by each significant media site (which reliably demonstrate seniors as having the most astounding voter turnout - time for the young to lift it up). Your vote really matters and the country needs and needs to hear your feeling. We live in a vote based system (a term utilized delicately as a part of our general public). A democracy is a system of government in which the entirety of the population participates. So, participate all the time.

The 2000 presidential election was a major eye opener for many people. As it appeared to also be the dismay of many, the candidate who won the most popular votes nationwide actually lost the contest. In the election's risen moment, popular attention centered around the Electoral College and its role in the presidential election. Under the U.S. Constitution, the people did not necessarily direct vote for the President in a nationwide election; rather, the people in each state would vote for electors from that state, who in turn would cast the constitutionally decisive votes for President and Vice President. Moreover, not only is the people's influence indirect, the Electoral College's voting pattern does not necessarily track the national popular

In 1967, the American Bar Association endorsed the idea of scrapping the Electoral College while replacing it with a countrywide vote for the President. The proposal provided for a runoff balloting amongst the top two presidential runners in the scenario that none of the candidates garnered at least 40% of the standard vote. In the recommendations approved by the House in 1969 and Senate in 1970, various electoral stakeholders attacked the changes seen harsh on the system that functioned well for a long time. In fact, many architects of the Electoral College had supposed that it would flop by realizing a marginal president. Besides that, some scholars have criticized the Electoral College, referring

Throughout the history of the United States, the right to vote is one of the most important

The Electoral College has been losing favor for years, but recent elections have created all-new debates about its use and value. The institution has existed almost since American elections have existed, and it is deeply intertwined with the issue of political parties. American voting is highly bureaucratized. The Electoral College betrays American values of majority rule: a candidate can win the election without a majority of popular votes; some states are overrepresented; and a large number of citizens get left out, thus, the Electoral College should be abolished or reformed.

Within the United States of America 's democratic system, there are paths that representatives can follow in voting when it comes to the terms of how to best influence the living state of the government and the country. There are numerous ways that Congressional members can be influenced in regards to how they cast ballots, but the most prominent ones are found in constituent opinions, interest groups, and political parties in general. The Legislative Branch of government that Congress resides in was designed to hold the strongest amount of power, even with checks and balances of other Branches enabled, because it is to represent the Framers ' major goals (Ginsberg et al 2012, 41). With how this branch of the government was designed it holds many powers in regards to voting on major government issues, and is full of individuals who we place our trust in. However, the influences mentioned above can be done in both positive or negative ways, so what we must find and address are if the influences are for the greater or worsening of our existence, and if allowing these to continued is the proper way to achieve the best outcome in regards to decisions made for the country. Is it possible that there is a grandly best path for members to follow in deciding how to vote, or are these aforementioned influences the only way to truly decide such important decisions?

The results of the recent election has brought criticism to the electoral college. Donald Trump did not win the popular vote, but he did win the majority of the states. Like many Americans, my first instinct was to criticize the electoral college. If Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, she should be the President of the United States. However, it is just not that simple. The electoral college still serves a valid purpose because it is currently the best way to represent the population during an election.

During this last election, there has been a lot of controversy between the electoral college and the popular vote. Some young voters felt like their votes didn’t count because Hillary won the popular vote by 2.9 million votes. There has been protest all around the country at college campuses and government buildings fighting for the electoral college to be questioned as a viable presidential selection process. They protest that Hillary should have been elected President of the United States of America based on the popular voting method. Hillary won the popular

On August 6, 1965 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the Voters Rights Act. Signed into law during the height of the Civil Rights Movement, it overcame legal barriers from states and local government agencies aimed at blocking African Americans from voting; a right guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution

A critical time has come in America where we have just elected our next president. Much of America is outraged that the said "underdog", Donald Trump, won over Hilary Clinton. There has been protesting throughout the nation to ask the Electoral College to vote for Trump in there voting process on December 18. In the election process, there are two votes, popular and electoral college vote. Regardless of who wins the popular vote, they can still lose the presidential race if they are not the first to reach 270 electoral votes. That is the case in this current election between Clinton and Trump. Trump won the electoral votes and Clinton won the popular vote. According to the voting process, the winner is who wins the electoral college. Although

As a citizens in the US, as soon as we turn eighteen we have the right to vote, this means we have a say in who represents us in government and whether certain issues are passed or not. We can vote in both local and national elections ranging from who’s on our school board to whom the president will be. Since this is America, we are free to complain about how the USA is today, but do we do anything to change it? Most of the USA does not actually do anything, in our generation the USA has seen the lowest voter turnout since World War 2. Some people will complain that their vote does not count but in reality it does, the local elections are based solely on the majority of the people, and in national elections the elected representatives of

The reason why the United States abides by a electoral college system is because it provides people that live in lowly populated rural areas to have a voice in elections. Adhering to a popular vote would render rural areas as useless, since highly populated urban cities would dominate the voting process. In addition, the electoral college gives small states the opportunity to be competitive against large states with massive populations. The electoral votes for every state is designated by its population size and all receives two electors from its senators.

Since the dawn of our nation, a carefully designed system has been in place for electing the president of the United States of America. Known as the electoral college, this process places emphasis on winning the popular vote in individual states, as opposed to winning it in the nation as a whole. However, this institution often comes under fire from all types of people in the country for what they believe to be its many flaws. Yet the system was installed by the founding fathers themselves, so it surely has to be perfect. Not necessarily, and that is the assumption every critic of the electoral college is working under. Several elections throughout America’s history has been considered controversial or