The Influence Of The Bobo Doll Experiment

Many said that when they were in the experiment they felt that they were expected to act aggressively towards the bobo doll.

28), which in this experiment are the conditions of watching a model acting with the Bobo doll (four different ways mentioned above), and of not watching a model interacting with the Bobo doll.

In the Bobo doll experiment, the kids demonstrated behavior similar to what the saw. The hit the doll, hammered the doll, and kick the doll. Then the kids began to adopt different ways of attacking the doll, whether it was with a gun, smacking it with a ball, or hitting the tether ball which hit the Bobo doll. One possible implication of viewing violence when it comes to social learning is that violence might be a product of what they are taught. Like in the video, the kids saw an adult beating up a doll. In a way, the may think if the adult can do it, I can also beat up the doll. If the kid does not differentiate from what is appropriate from adult behavior, and kids behavior, they will copy behavior of authority. Another implication could

I found Bobo experiment interesting since they cover the most types of validity. I have realized while watching the experiment, that boys were more aggressive than girls. In a way male except violence more than female. For instance, my husband can watch more horror and extremely violent movies than I do, and I prefer movies with less violence.

The Bobo doll was a fun toy and probably because it could be abused is what made it fun. Albert Bandura’s famous Bobo doll experiment utilized this fact by testing where children might possibly get their aggression (Smith & Mackie, 2014). Where do children get their aggressive attitudes from as in nature or nurture is a question it was hoping to address. The children were exposed to adults that would beat up on the doll and later be observed to see if this influenced them to be aggressive (Smith & Mackie, 2014). There is a theory that a thing observed will not act the same way as it does when it is not, and it makes one wonder how they try to curb this fact when doing experiments of this type.

aggression) can be acquired by observation and imitation. The experiment consisted of children from the age’s three to six being split and put into three separate rooms with a bunch of toys and an adult, in which they observed how the adults interacted/played with the toys. In one room, the children witnessed the adult acting aggressively towards a toy called the bobo doll. When it was time for the children to individually go back in the room to play, the majority of the children reciprocated what they saw the adults doing. Another set of children were placed in a room and observed to a non-aggressive model (adult) where the model played with everything but the Bobo doll. When the children were placed in the room, the majority of them acted in the same manner as the adult previously in the room. Lastly, another set of children were put into a room without any sort of model; they played accordingly without any influence. In relation to my survey, six out of ten people stated how they have witnessed a bad experience happen to someone and later took on that phobia. In conclusion, I believe the Bobo experiment supports my hypothesis of how phobias can be inherited by influence instead of by

The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew straws to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher’. The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was part of the experiment, pretending to be a real participant. Volunteers were recruited for a false

In this assignment I’m going to explain a psychological experiment, of free choice. First I’m going to explain who did the experiment, where it took place and when it was completed. Afterwards I’m going to describe the purpose of the experiment and some of the results. At last I’m going to put it up for discussion in my group.

In this experiment, children were first shown a video of an adult hitting, assaulting, punching and kicking the Bobo doll. Then they were brought into a room and left alone with nothing, no toys but a Bobo doll. Later, the children were seen to imitate the actions of the adult in the video, inflicting violence onto the doll. For observational learning to happen, there must be a motivation for people to perform the action. In this case, the children were left with no toys but the Bobo doll. Additionally, they must also observe the actions, retain the memory to be able to reproduce, imitate and repeat the actions carried out by the adult in the video.

Albert Bandura (1977), the originator of social learning theory, focused his research on the process of how people learn through observation. Social Learning stems from a cognitive and behavioral theory model. This is demonstrated through the well-known Bobo Doll experiment. The experiment entailed a child observing an adult being aggressive towards the Bobo Doll (Pavlov et al., 1961). The results indicated that children imitated the observed behaviors of being aggressive towards the doll (Pavlov et al., 1961).

There are several theories that focus on a child’s development. One is Elliot Turiel’s moral domain theory which states that there is a difference between how a child develops moral reasoning. Those differences rely in the concept of mortality and social convention while having experiences in their social communities. According to the video “A Child's Mind: How Kids Learn Right & Wrong”, Albert Bandura’s theory of moral development states that social learning occurs through observation or direct instruction. He also uses rewards and punishments to introduce reinforcements.

In 1961 Albert Bandura and two of his colleagues set out to find empirical evidence to support his Social Learning Theory, which is the "theory that we learn social behavior by observing and imitating and by being rewarded and punished.” (Myers 162) The “Transmission of Aggression Through Imitation of Aggressive Models,” is more famously known as the Bobo doll study. The Bobo doll study tested children's susceptibility to aggressive tendencies by exposing them to adult models who exhibited aggressive behaviors and observing how the child expressed frustration later on away from the adult model.

Albert Bandura (currently at Standord University), the lead scientist behind these studies, thought that the children would play with the doll in whatever manner they had seen the adults play with the doll. This is precisely what the studies found.

Alburt bandura was born December 4, 1925 in Mundare Canada. After graduating highschool bandura received a bachelors degree from the university of British Columbia he graduated with a bolocan award in psychology . He then did graduate work at the University of Iowa where he received a masters degree in 1951. He then received a doctorate in clinical psychology in 1952. Bandura accepted a 1 year instructorship at Stanford University where he very quickly got a professorship. After about two years he became the chairman og the psychology department. In 1961 Bandura conducted his most well known experiment known as the” bobo doll experiment” a study in which researchers physically and verbally abused a clown-faced inflatable toy in front of preschool-age

There has been an age old struggle throughout human history, which continues to haunt society today. Parents, teachers, developmental psychologist and behaviorists are continually asking, “What type of people will our children become?” Furthermore, the topic has been addressed for over two thousand years. A vast amount of data has been collected concerning the development of morality in children and adolescents. Throughout the year’s adults’, especially parents, have been a central focus in the study of children’s moral development. The purpose of this paper is to present a basic view of moral development in the span of a person’s life from childhood to adolescence. First, we will examine what the meaning of childhood morality is, then explore the theories that outline characteristics of moral behavior as a child develops. Finally, we will see what role moral reasoning plays in a child’s life as they develop into adolescents.