The International Debate Over Resolving The Humanitarian Crisis

There were suicide bombings in cafe’s, restaurants, and a concert hall. One event of the night was a police and terrorist standoff after the terrorists took hostages. There were 80-99 people who were seriously wounded, and 365 other people who had lesser injuries. Seven ISIS attackers were also killed during the attacks. The Paris attacks were the worst attacks since WW2 .

CNN reports on “Timeline: What happened in Paris attacks” on Friday, November 13th. In Paris, a deadly terrorist attack occurred,where seven of the terrorist were killed and they killed more than one hundred people. ISIS took responsibility for this attack. In a span of about thirty minutes, six attacks took place in different locations. This is attack is being called the worst terror attack in Europe in ten years.

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, popularly known as ISIS and Daesh, is the 21st centuries rising global threat to humanity. The world has united to reduce and ultimately prevent genocide. In the paper ISIS will be referenced as Daesh. The initial part of the essay will cover Daesh origins, ideology, goals, and objectives. It is essential to know the similarities of the present Daesh brutalities and historic barbarisms of Wahhabism. The rest of the essay will focus on leadership, funding, and capabilities, such as physical bases support locations. The conclusion will attempt to raise concern of the internal threat within the United States. This essay will be limited to sources not having access to restricted or classified information. The closing goal of this essay is to embolden the serious threat to the United States and other countries seeking pursuit of life, liberty and happiness.

The U.S. military response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 signifies the most extensive use of force by any state since the Persian Gulf War more than two decades ago. Following these operations, many commentators have suggested that there has been a notable transformation in international law regarding state responsibility for terrorist acts. This essay aims to argue that such change has been significant and it has satisfactorily countenanced states’ response to terrorism by presenting evidence of new state practice plus opinio juris in this area. To do so, this essay will first discuss the controversial concept of terrorism and its relevance to the legal framework for the use of armed force in international law. From here, it will move to explicate the principles of and grounds for state responsibility as well as to debate that the act of providing a safe haven for terrorist non-state actors should be considered as a revolutionary factor to the concept of attribution. Lastly, this essay will examine the recent changes occurred in customary law on state responsibility in the light of the application and interpretation of Article 51 of the United Nations Charter after the events of September 11. All these aspects will demonstrate that not only has the law on state responsibility had noticeably developed and consequently provided states with adequate legality to react to the challenges posed by contemporary terrorism, but it has also begun to inaugurate binding

Since then, security and security risk management has been at the forefront for 10 years. Recently, Europe has seen many terrorist attacks forcing them to make changes. Some examples of this recent terrorism Began in March 2004, al-Qaida simultaneously detonated 10 bombs throughout the train lines of Spain’s capital city Madrid killing 191 people and injuring 2,050. In the United Kingdom (UK), London’s transportation network was attacked by suicide bombers killing 52 people and causing $52 million US dollars of damage. The UK has been one of the more successful European countries when it comes to catching terrorists. From 2001-2011, over 2,800 people have been arrested for terrorist related offences compared to the United States 154 people. In 2011, a single nationalist named Anders Behring Breivik bombed a government building in Oslo, Norway. One week later, he made his way to a Norwegian labor camp located 25 miles away and killed 69 more in another bombing. Recently, the past couple of years, a new terrorist group has begun to emerge called ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria). In November of 2015, a series of six attacks took place, 3 suicide bombers struck near the Stade de France followed by suicide bombings and mass shootings at cafés, restaurants and a music venue in central Paris. After this devastating attack ended, there were 130 dead and nearly 400 injured. The most recent attack by ISIS took place in March of 2016 at the airport in Brussels, Belgium. Two explosions had been set off killing 13 and wounding 81, and one hour later in downtown Belgium at Maelbech Metro Station, one bomb was set off killing 20 people and wounding

Friday, November 13th was a tragic day all over the world, but especially in Paris, France. A very anticipated soccer match between France and Germany was set to take place, and the stadium was attacked by terrorists carrying AK-47s; however, some of them had bombs strapped onto their bodies. ISIS took liability for the attacks in six different locations of the much-loved capital. Hundreds died at the soccer match along with over eighty dying at a concert hall where U2 was performing that Friday night. Also, at the concert hall, over one hundred hostages were found and brought out for safety whilst two attackers were killed at the venue.

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks have represented the end of the warfare system built in the aftermath of the Second World War. On the other hand, the tough US reaction culminated in the creation of a new order shaped by the terrorist threat and characterized by the so-called “war on terror”: an unprecedented way of doing politics and conducing conflicts. This scenario brought new challenges and perils to the legal framework aimed at regulating the relationships within international actors: international law, international humanitarian law and human rights law. New tendencies on behalf of States jeopardize the international system as a whole.

The terrorist group ISIS has conducted or inspired 140 attacks in 29 countries around the world. From 2004-2016, Islamic terrorists have killed 557 people in different countries in Europe. The one with the most fatalities is the November 2015 Paris attacks, three suicide bombers and several mass shootings took the lives of 130. France is on high alert after these attacks and are working to prevent more. All of these attacks do not include in Iraq and Syria, where the fatalities are much greater.

Investigators believe the Paris attacks were planned in Belgium, suicide bombers trained in Syria and became terrorist’ in liaison with ISIS. “The Paris and Brussels plotters appear to have shared a bomb maker, Najim Laachraoui, 24, a Belgian of Moroccan descent, who is widely reported as having been one of the suicide bombers at the Brussels Airport.” (Rubin, 2016). This compounds the fear factor from the Paris attacks, that the suicide bombers were part of a wider trend of fighters from Syria and Iraq. The people of Brussel were also caught by surprise, much like the incident with the Oklahoma City bombing. The network was composed of people who knew each other for

How: A string of hostage situations, mass shootings, and suicide bombings were planned out and executed by ISIS to target Paris. Multiple slip ups in France’s security systems may have led to easier implementation of the plans, as well as the large and sudden influx of Syrian refugees coming from the

There was an immediate understanding that the attacks involved an international network of extremists who operated across borders and moving between countries and even continents. Muslim immigrant in Europe felt the heat most because the policies that were changed or created mostly focused on the Muslim community, especially in Western Europe. Countries imposed heavy restriction on entry for Muslim, retaining communities find themselves in tremendous pressure to comply with the new set of rules and obligation to follow which further disintegrated them from the mainstream society as they perceive these bindings against the Muslim community and hatred towards them and as a means of discrimination upon them. As the path of legal migration was tightened, an increase in illegal immigrants was seen, along with growing skepticism concerning multiculturalist ideologies, and perceived potential threats of terrorism or radical extremism. Most of the member states started to revise their immigration policy more scrutinize than ever before Muslims as well as other communities live there felt in immense pressure of deportation for this new

The struggle against international terrorism has become more of a serious issue since 9/11, but France has treated counterterrorism which is the strategies that the government and military used for decades in respond to any terrorist acts. The French government views counterterrorism whether domestic and foreign in the same manner. France treats the enemy combatant at a high priority level, while America has now gain universal acceptance since 9/11. However, “the French governments view the threat of terrorism differently from the United States. Although France considers Islamic terrorism a major threat, it does not view terrorist actions as an “act of war” against France or against the

Paris was shaded by terror attack yesterday night,  153 innocent lives were killed, and around  200 were injured in this brutal terror attack, according to the French media  ISIS took the responsibility of this gruesome terror attack in Paris, and this attack is being seen similar to the 26/11 attack of Bombay.

Four bombs and four shootings. This resulted in over 130 people dead. The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) claimed responsibility for the attacks after the bombings and shootings. There were seven known terrorists and two were named. Their names were Bilal Hafdi and Ismael Omar Mostefai. These attacks triggered rallies in New York, Washington D.C., London, Berlin, Madrid, Geneva, Rio de Janeiro, Montreal, and many other cities.

In early November 2015, attacks in Paris covering five separate locations killing over 130 people and hundreds more wounded. These attacks were described by “President Francois Hollande as an act of war organized by the Islamic State (IS) militant group” (“Paris Attacks”, 2015). Three bombs were donated by suicide bombers outside of Stade de France stadium were a sporting event was taking place. A fourth member of the group fired over one hundred rounds of a high-powered rifle into a busy nightlife destination. This was followed with similar style terror acts at restaurants and a concert hall throughout the city. These attacks were identified to be carried out by Islamic terrorist organizations. These actions prompted for the deeper examination of countries dealings with extremist organizations. In the case of the Paris attack, the French government chooses to utilize aggressive tactics to achieve their desired results. In the days “immediately after the