The Internet's Harm on Children

The fundamentals of the social learning theory significantly describe offenders and their criminal behavior which is learned based on observation and imitation. A researcher by the name of Albert Bandura along with coworkers tested the social learning theory with several experiments on children and their imitation of aggression based on what they saw and were exposed to. Bandura’s focus was to prove that human behavior such as aggression is learned through social imitations and copying the actions of others. Walters (1966) gives details about the Bobo doll experiment and explains its purpose related to learning a violent behavior based on observation. In the experiment, the tested subjects were children of both sexes, ranging from the ages of three to six years. Some of the children were exposed to a non-aggressive adult, while the other children were placed in a room with an aggressive adult who would both physically and verbally attack the Bobo doll. The control group in the experiment was not exposed to any adult. During the second phase of the experiment, the children were left in a room by themselves with the toys, and watched to see if they would demonstrate the aggressive behavior like that of which they observed adults doing earlier. Walter (1966) describes the results as “children who had been exposed to an aggressive model showed more imitative physical and verbal

The room was also equipped with a one-way window so the child could be observed without their acknowledgement. The experiment showed that the consequences in the films that the children observed in the ending, created a different outcome. The children who witnessed the film were the adult was rewarded was most likely to repeat or imitate the aggressive behavior toward the Bobo doll. In the situation of the other children who watched the adult being punished for their aggressive behavior, the children were less likely to recreate the aggressive behavior towards the Bobo doll. After the findings Bandura added to the experiment. The children who watched any of the three films were asked to recreate what the adult did in the film. Each imitation the child recreated correctly, they were rewarded with candy and stickers. Virtually all the children were capable of recreating all actions, aggressive or non-aggressive. The different variations of the films the children watched had no impact on them. In conclusion to Bandura’s experiment, you are capable of imitating any behavior, aggressive or non-aggressive, but you are more likely to imitate if there is expectation of any type of reward.

1.1 Identify the current legislation, guidelines, policies and procedures of safeguarding the welfare of children and young people

The risks and possible consequences for children and young people of being online or using a mobile phone can be numerous

By watching the video about Dr. Bandura’s Bobo doll experiment, it is clear that his hypothesis was that children who see aggressive behavior tend to be aggressive, while children who do not see aggressive behavior will probably not show an aggressive behavior (Research Methods Presentation). Bandura’s hypothesis was that “children can learn about aggressive behaviors by observing the action of others” (Durkin, 1995, pp. 405-406).

The Bobo doll was a fun toy and probably because it could be abused is what made it fun. Albert Bandura’s famous Bobo doll experiment utilized this fact by testing where children might possibly get their aggression (Smith & Mackie, 2014). Where do children get their aggressive attitudes from as in nature or nurture is a question it was hoping to address. The children were exposed to adults that would beat up on the doll and later be observed to see if this influenced them to be aggressive (Smith & Mackie, 2014). There is a theory that a thing observed will not act the same way as it does when it is not, and it makes one wonder how they try to curb this fact when doing experiments of this type.

There have always been people saying that violent movies and video games harm children and make them more susceptible to display violent behavior. According to Albert Bandura’s Study called the “Bobo Doll Experiment” this is true. Through this experiment and a few other’s Bandura came up with the Social Learning Theory. The Social Learning Theory is the theory that Bandura used to describe a way of learning through observation or direct instructions.

The non-aggressive group of kids watched a video in which the doll was being treated nicely. Lastly, the control condition group was not exposed to any video. Subsequently, children were taken to room full of toys including the Bobo Doll. The observation covered 20 minutes with a kid alone in the room. The results were labeled that children from the aggressive model group tend to imitate more aggressive responses that the other two groups. Also, researchers found that there is a difference between genders; meaning that boys tend to copy the physical aggressive behavior from the same-sex child in the video. And, they also discovered that girls were more tended to show verbally aggressive behavior. In recap, simply, paying attention to a particular behavior like the one showed in the video, would lead to imitation if it calls our

This paper will be discussing the three theories under the Social Process theory, Social learning theory, Social Control theory, and the Social labeling theory. This paper will also be discussing the similarities and differences of these theories. The Social Process theory is the view that criminality is a function of people’s interactions with various organizations, institutions, and processes in society. Social Learning theory is the view that people learn to be aggressive by observing others acting aggressively to achieve some goal or being rewarded for violent acts.

The basic concept that Albert Bandura demonstrated in the bobo doll study is to see if children were shown modeled behavior would they mimic that behavior the results were yes in fact the little boy modeled the behavior he was shown i believe that video games television and media can promote violent behaviors in observational learning however being that this is something that is taught not all children will show the same results.just because children do not perform the violence they have seen certainly doe not mean they are not learning that behavior and that is a scary thought . This makes me think about when people would say to me watch what you say when you have little ones around because they can easily pick up on your behaviors and language

In the Bobo Doll Experiment conducted by Stanford University’s Dr. Albert Bandura the researchers were interested in a few things. The researchers were interested in seeing whether or not, if social behaviors such as aggression can be influenced and acquired by imitation and as well observation. In this study the participants were composed of 36 boys and 36 girls from the nursery on campus, all ranging in the ages from 3 to 6. In this study a tall inflatable plastic toy that were painted as clown, also known as a bobo doll was used. The bobo doll was buoyant and had weight at the bottom which allowed it to stand back up after being knocked down. Moving on the participants were all split into three groups: in which one group observed aggressive

There have been many experiments to show how children can model violence after what they have been shown. One of the most famous models involves “Bobo the doll”. A group of twenty four children were involved in this experiment, some were shown aggressive behavior, some nonaggressive behavior, and some were shown no model. The children who were involved in seeing the aggressive model were more likely to repeat the aggressive behavior they were shown. Most involved hitting or shooting the doll, many threw the doll and repeated punches. This model shows that children are likely to repeat the aggressive behavior that is shown and modeled to them.

“Internet, mobility, and multimedia are important technology tools that are used in education industry” (Hameed 372).Although the internet is an important tool in the classroom and out, it does have downsides. Websites have become more commercialized, and this has made searching through websites difficult since not all websites are reliable. In the Journal done by Shihab Hameed he says that statistics show that teenagers use the internet more than adults, they use the internet to play games, listen to music and meet new people. Hameed also mentions that it reduces student activity. Students are able to get solutions to homework and as result

Video games shoulder the blame when discussing the delicate minds of children and what they are exposed to. The name of their game: Desensitization. A virtual reality which enables adolescents to relate to or live through a fictional character can undercut the violence some of these games let the player experience. “First person shooter (FPS), Massive Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games and fighting games largely favor intense battles with temporary or no unfavorable consequences”(Philips 2009). Some games allow the user total freedom, including the ability to run over, shoot, and dismember pedestrians for points. The impact may vary between aggressive behavior and social ineptitude; either which still requiring a nominal amount of exposure to highly explicit depictions by this form of entertainment. In addition, not to be left out is the possibility that a lack of sufficient interaction from parental figures resulted in the reclusive or aggressive behavior of a child to begin with(Jones).

The figure show that internet is very easy to be accessible. As we can all see that internet access is very convenient these day, the fact of using internet has no age limited. People start using an electronic devices at young age which created an unlimitation for children to access the internet. Internet is very helpful for children education but at the same time ‘’ While it can bring considerable benefits for their education and development, it also exposes them to online risks such as access to inappropriate content, harmful interactions.‘’ (‘’The protection of children online’’, 2011, pg.5). Internet Censorship are needed to protect a children. Many children become a victim of