The Intersection Of Race And Sex : A Concept Analysis

Doetsch-Kidder’s (2016) monograph defines the important role of intersectionality as a defining sea-change in the way that women of color began to unify across racial and cultural barriers. Interviews with minority activists define the perception of the diversification of feminist ideology through the lens of intersectionality. One interview with a African-American activist named Donna illustrates the unity between women of color that evolved in the 1970s: “But overall, we are all fighting for civil rights, so there has to be some type of overlap with each one” (Doetsch-Kidder, 2016, p.103). This development defines the “overlapping’ ideology of different feminist groups, which soon began to devolve the racial and cultural barriers not only between women of color, but also with white feminist groups. In Doetsch-Kidder’s (2016) point of view, the civil rights movement laid the foundation for intersectional feminist principles to be practiced for women seeking greater representation in the workplace.

In this sense, society relies on the reciprocal relations of humans. Society is derived from these reciprocal interactions and does not precede them. Society operates through our refraction and manifests through our actions. (Simmel) Building off a traditional Hobbesian view, human society is distinct from a ‘personal’ phase, rather it is deeply socially constructed. Society consists of interrelated activities in which humans can act in accordance with each other as well as against each other. Society is not a collection of individual humans nor a system of institutions. For Weber, society is in the interactions, not in the institutions. Society generates norms and values which influence human conduct, which is constantly being built through interaction. From the symbolic interaction perspective, there is no moral judgment placed on interaction.

Intersectionality is a framework that must be applied to all social justice work, a frame that recognizes the multiple aspects of identity that enrich our lives and experiences. This framework synthesizes and complicates oppressions and marginalization’s. In the article, “Why Intersectionality Can’t Wait” Kimberle Crenshaw talks about how the purpose of intersectionality has been lost. Intersectional somehow creates an environment of bullying and privilege checking. This society cannot afford to have movements that are not intersectional because all races need to be embraced and have equality.

Haynes (2016) article, The Road to Cultural Competency Are We There yet? Stated that the key to decreasing health disparities in the workforce could be done by increasing diversity. Health disparities as indicated by Turk (2014), Issue: Nursing Workforce, can result in a more complicated societal problem. It was further stated, health disparities have received much attention and is currently identified as a priority issue in our nation. According to Haynes (2016), strategies which were recommended by the Sullivan Commission were done to increase the workforces of nursing should begin with education. Cultural competency as stated here should be a vital component of the nursing curriculum. Turk (2014) reported health disparities result in a more multifaceted societal burden. According to Turk (2014), decreasing health disparities has received significant attention. Individuals, including policymakers, academicians, and researchers are concerned about the diversification of the healthcare workforce of which strategies are being implemented by decreasing health disparities and increasing the availability of culturally competent among health care providers.

Intersectionality refers to the idea of the overlapping social identities that one might have. This article explores the problems that arise when not having intersectional awareness. For example, it describes a situation in which a woman was turned away from a shelter for domestic violence victims due to her inability to speak English. Often times in history and still to this day, social movements advocate for progress in their area of interest while simultaneously stepping on other groups.

The theory of intersectionality is one put forth by the feminist theorist known as Kimberlé Crenshaw. Crenshaw developed this theory as a critique to what she called a single-axis framework. A single-axis framework is one that considers an issue, be it feminist or otherwise, as a product of a single aspect. To be clearer, and to provide an example, a single-axis framework would consider the experiences of a woman of colour as either those experienced by an individual of colour, or those experienced by a woman. Crenshaw introduced the concept of intersectionality to explain that some experiences are unique to those who fall under a combination of these categories. In her article, “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex”,

Suggesting that policies and services tailored to the specific health care needs of Black SMW are crucial to providing the best care for this population. To this end, a suitable mechanism for addressing the health care disparities among Black SMW is intersectionality theory. The present paper, therefore argues for the application of an intersectional prism in health research. Drawing from assets theory and life course theory, this paper aims to elucidate several critical themes that should be considered in future research endeavors that incorporates the needs of marginalized voices. Intersectionality theory was developed to address the multifaceted experiences of marginalized people (Crenshaw, 1989). Intersectionality theory states that systems of oppression are interconnected and there are those who are multiply burdened because they hold more than one marginalized social identity.

Intersectionality is the practice (law) of looking at the overlap of a gender and race regarding an individual. In most practices before intersectionality it was common practice in law to group a gender together or an one race together in belief that they all had the same struggle and searched for the same outcome. Which was misguided and instead of handling one gender or race for instance (black people as a whole) looking at someone 's gender and race as a package (black women not just all women).

Prior to being termed intersectionality, intersectional analysis emerged in the 1970’s and 1980’s to critique the mainstream second-wave feminist movement (Dhillon & Lyon, 2014). The critique was that this movement focused on the experiences of White, middle-class women, and therefore, neglected issues that affected ‘other’ women. Kimberlé Crenshaw, a Black feminist, introduced the term Intersectionality in 1989 (Hulko, 2009). She used this term to address the intersecting natures of oppression that Black women were experiencing in the workplace based on both race and gender. Intersectionality was therefore created to demonstrate the entanglement of identity categories that make up an individual, as well as the different attributions of power that are attached to these categories (Hulko, 2009).

The limited scope in which intersectionality is addressed by health care professionals and scholars is partly due to the complexity of intersectionality. The concept of intersectionality can be challenging to address partly because of the boundless meanings it holds across various disci-plines (Nash, 2010). While the definition of intersectionality is understood to describe the inter-section of the various systems of domination in producing oppression and discrimination and in constructing dominant and non-dominant social identities, it is disputed whether it has political, theoretical and/or methodological implications (Nash, 2010). Nash (2010) proposed that intersec-tionality should be treated as a metaphor to be used for a more complete

Intersectionality promotes an understanding of human beings as shaped by the interaction of different social locations race/ethnicity, Indigeneity, gender, class, sexuality, geography, age, disability/ability, migration status, religion. Kimberlé Crenshaw focused on Black women to show that the “single-axis” framework of discrimination analysis not only ignores the way in which identities intersect in people’s lives, but also erases the experiences of some people. As a result, she argued black women are sometimes excluded from feminist theory and antiracist policy discourse because both are predicated on a discrete set of experiences that often does not accurately reflect the interaction of race and gender”.

The Intersectionality of Race and Sex in How to Make Love to a Negro Without Getting Tired

These compartments of engagement include individual, group, organization/institutional, community, national, and international context. The emancipatory reflection promoted praxis and the ability to envision and act toward the possibility of individual and collective self-determination. The interpretive findings of this theory include the voice of privilege primarily informed ENP theory, the lack of nursing educational and organizational support in social justice role development, and the advocate role should expand to include the role of an ally. Health and disparities and inequality are socioeconomically constructed. The theory encourages nurses to engage in social justice to identify and redress the social conditions that negatively impact individual and public health. Professional awareness and involvement may increase if a theoretical framework is developed and this theory could be used in addressing the root cause of public and individual health concerns. For example, using this theory, the health problems that we are witnessing in our community today such as diabetes associated with sugary beverages could be addressed by implementing the ENP theory.

Imagine you are at an intersection. Traffic is free to come and go in four directions, and you are standing in the middle. Discrimination, just like an intersection, can flow in many directions and an accident can occur from any to all of them. Similarly, if a woman of color is hurt because she is standing in the middle of an intersection, her injury could result from sex or race discrimination, or even both. However each are a constant threat, just as the moving cars are. Intersectionality lies in understanding that multiple oppressions are not each felt separately but rather as a single, unified experience.

Intersectionality is one of the most commonly used methods of analysis in the past decade. Some of the distinct characterizations of intersectional feminism from other streams of feminism are that it recognizes that an individual can face many forms of