The Investigation Of Moral Issues Brought Upon Nanotechnology

The human race is embedded with a natural predilection to create, innovate, and advance. It’s our way of moving forward and improving as a society to increase the quality of our day to day life’s and stay on top of the hierarchal food chain. But every new creation or advancement comes with a plethora of ethical issues that must be resolved. Unfortunately, as we continue to advance technology the complexity of these ethical dilemmas grow to new heights.

Nowadays, Technology has been an important knowledge of tools and crafts used to help people in many different life aspects in order to generate efficiency and optimize time, money and any kind of resource. In many societies, technology has helped develop more advanced economies and has allowed the rise of a leisure class. In addition, various implementations of technology influence the values of a society and new technology often raises new ethical questions. Due to, the problems about pollution and global warming has been taking a significant conscience of people to start having control in the use of technology and how our action affects the environment. Many technological processes produce unwanted by products, known as pollution, and deplete natural resources, to the detriment of the Earth and its environment. Firstly, technology refers to tools and machines that may be used to solve real world problems fulfill needs or satisfy wants for the benefit of life. A modern example, is the rise of communication technology, which has lessened barriers to human interaction and, as a result, has helped spawn new subcultures; the rise of cyber culture has, at its basis, the development of the

BZRK, a novel by Michael Grant, is a science fiction story, about the misuse of nanotechnology. In the novel BZRK, nanotechnology is used for negative reasons, by the Armstrong Fancy Gift Corporation. This is an analogy of a world with nanotechnology in a modern day era. The technology developed the ability to make microscopic robots that can enter the human body through natural openings to change structures at a molecular level. They created it for medical purposes, for example, “to send his tiny minions in to kill cancer cells” (Grant, 72). Nanotechnology is being negatively used to take away freedom and chose for human beings. This good technology is used the wrong way to control the human mind and commit murder. Many of people with access

The Nanoethics Group. "The Bad." Nanoethics - The Ethics and Societal Impact of Nanotechnology. The Nanoethics Group, 2008. Web. 07 Apr.

Mankind has been exercising in ancient conundrum since its inception almost, the quest for knowledge inevitably leads to questions of morality. The United States took technology of splitting atoms, a purely scientific endeavor and morphed

Ethical theory is the principle of for autonomy, beneficence, justice, and nonmalefience. Autonomy essentially means to respect other choices and human dignity. Beneficence is to bring about good in all actions. Justice is the obligation to treat others fairly, and nonmalefience is to cause little to no harm as possible. Above the outlined principles, there are five ethical theories; deontology, utilitarian, rights, casuist, and virtue. This paper will explore how the ethical theories of utilitarianism and casuist and how they apply to the artificial

This assignment will discuss the ethical concept of genetic engineering and how it demonstrates its relevance to midwifery professional practice and maternity care. Before analysing genetic engineering and looking at the arguments as to whether it is ethically right, an understanding of what the terms and lawful procedures mean should be determined.

The world must face the following reality: enhancement technologies – those that would enhance the quality of human health and human abilities – will have the potential to be made. Technologies such as those will better the lives of those who choose to receive those enhancements. Let’s suppose that these technologies will be available to everyone and not change human nature or undermine morality. If that occurred, then the following scenario and conclusion would result:

Ethics - better known as the difference between morally correct and incorrect - play a major role in today’s scientific research and events. Two sources of major ethical questioning in biotechnology are stem cell research and/or use as well as gene therapy. Both areas have enabled science to make immense strides toward cures to various diseases and disorders, however, if left with no parameters, both stem cells and gene therapy may be used inappropriately, or worse, unethically.

There are many ethical issues that arise in Neurotechnology and Cognitive Enhancement of the human brian. The neuroethical issues and bioethical must be discussed in great depth, for the lack of oversight on these issues could drastically change the course of history and our prominent future.

In the essay by Dhali Lama, Lama talks about how our morality should have something to do with our advancements in technology, and how we should use moral components such as compassion when we make a new development or technology. New technology such as cloning, genetic plant modification, and changing the DNA of a human embryo in order to get the " ideal" baby can have some long lasting effects on us, because each and everyone of them has some sort of potential dangers of their technologies. When we apply these technologies we should let our moral compass decide if we are going to far with what we are doing, and if it can have a lasting affect on us in the near

There are many contemporary ethical problems that societies face without having a solid response. Most of these problems come from the conflict caused by the different ways these problems can be interpreted. There are also many ethical theories that defend the different views to such problems. Among these theories we can mention Virtue Ethics, Utilitarianism, Kantianism, etc. I think there is one of these theories that is very interesting in nature: Utilitarianism. In this work I will be giving a brief explanation of Utilitarianism, as well as discussing the character of consequentialist or not consequentialist of this ethical theory. Also, I will analyze each of the contemporary issues studied in this unit based on Utilitarianism, as well as mentioning anecdotes that pertain to such conflicts.

An ethical dilemma is a situation where one must choose between two conflicting options, which are all morally correct. It is worth to note that ethics and morals are not easy to separate, as they both define what human behaviour should be at all times. The two aspects address issues of right and wrong as pertains to different walks of life. Cultural norms usually determine the ethical behaviour of a society, and these norms would inform people’s take on right and wrong as they tread life. For example, a lady may conceive with a man then finds herself with another man before the pregnancy manifests physically. The latter man decides to take her for a pregnancy test before they could spend together and

Since the ideology that technological advancements impact the type of identity that individuals present, a majority of breakthrough research tends to draw towards a negative connotation. With direct correlation, Patrick Guinan, whom is a professor at the University of Missouri, discusses new technological ideas that are in research. He discusses whether or not advances in technology are ethically correct or if the results are unethical and god-like. Thus, the cases presented in Patrick Guinan’s work “Bioterrorism, Embryonic Stem Cells, and Frankenstein”, which is published in the Journal of Religion and Health for psychological and medical research, “Bioterrorism, Embryonic Stem Cells, and Frankenstein”. Consequently, an overwhelming majority of individuals believe that scientists should be forbade to perform experiments that “play god” in order to ease their curiosity. Furthermore, the issue is derived from a conflict of ethos; thus, Guinan believes in stronger regulations toward unethical experiments such as cloning and stem cell research.

In science laboratories all around the world, scientists are hard at work creating a multitude of products. But when these products are related to bringing a life into the world, the situation could get rather complicated. Frankenstein, a novel by Mary Shelley, tells the story of a scientist gone mad after creating life out of death, while the articles titled Kazuo Ishiguro’s uncanny science by Daniel Marchalik and Ann Jurecic (Source A), Pondering the consequences of gene editing by Joel Achenbach (Source B), and CRISPR, the disruptor by Heidi Ledford (Source C), talk about the consequences of gene-editing software in the world. The novel and articles both bring into the question ethics and morality. A creator is responsible for his own actions, his creation, and the rest of society, as shown by both the story of Frankenstein and the articles about the use of gene-editing software by scientists around the world.