The Is The Best And Worst Kinds Of Law Breaking

In the contemplation of art, or rather the conceptually intangible definition it currently possess, it is imperative to be mindful that “art” has been utilized as a promotional device, ceremonial item, aesthetically purposed article or perhaps none of these or all. It is because of this vague term that Carolyn Dean, in her text, “The Trouble with (The Term) Art”, makes a case for the consequences of applying the term “art” in societies that lacked such a notion which also accounts for the Western-centric lens the field intrinsically utilizes when viewing non-Western art. The claim is deftly supported by the utilization of expert accounts in the subject, alternative perspectives for what is considered the current norm, and self-examining questions,

Controversial pieces of art are nothing new; artists express their opinions and beliefs in their work, and those who see the artist’s views as problematic speak out against it. Art encourages debate, and debates can be angry and emotion-driven. But when a piece of art is created that is almost universality looked upon as having corrupt morals, the debate tends to switch “I disagree with what this art portrays” to, “this work of art should not be allowed in society, regardless of its quality.”

- The lines of traditional art have blurred over the years as new artistic movements have appeared and transformed the notion of what is considered art. As these movements have revolutionized the art world, popular culture has branched off from art, causing a shift; art is no longer a representation of popular culture and visa versa. In contemporary society art doesn’t exist to win any popularity contests, it exists to please the viewer, and is often deemed art by highly acclaimed art critics who don't speak from a popular culture standpoint. Art highly regarded by critics often goes against the grain and makes a statement, while popular culture is dictated by what the general public likes,

Do you own any crime comics such as Green Lantern, Batman or other superheroes? Well, according to section 163 1b of the Criminal Code of Canada, the person who gave or sold you a crime comic is a criminal. Today I’m going to explain this strange law, and a few others. I’m going to tell you why they were made and why they’re out of date. Finally, I will tell you why they can’t be enforced, and how each of us has broken a law.

Art is known to flaunt its own beauty by being artistic and expressive in its own unique measure. Diana Mack’s “It isn’t pretty…But is it Art?” depicts the ambience surrounding art while questioning the discrepancies among what is considered to be a good piece of art or not. Mack proposes the controversial public incidents in which it occurred, that prevented these art works to receive the legitimate amount of consideration and acknowledgement it deserved to receive. Meanwhile, Steve Grody’s “Graffiti: The Anatomy of a Piece” informs us on how arrogance and stereotypical views towards art and graffiti can conceal the true elegance and significance it tends to withhold. In support, he introduces us to the three continuums amplifying his perspective

Living in the United States we are governed by a system of laws. A Law is a set of rules you have to respect and follow. Without Laws the any country would be unsafe and scary to live in.

Graffiti is an often-contested medium, and has been so since the time of the Roman Empire. Appearing most commonly in large cities, the art is frequently in conflict with the administration of those cities themselves, who seek to control their own self-image by regulating the cultural production and aesthetic practices that occur within their walls.

For its first annual “ Forum” exhibition in 1917, Marcel Duchamp was the leading figure for displaying art for the, “American Society of Independent Artists” committee. Most significant, he anonymously submitted a work of art that would be so shocking and offensive

Noël Carroll claims that there are cases in which “the reason [a given] artwork is aesthetically defective- in the sense of failing to secure audience uptake- and the reason it is morally defective may be the same” (235). His claim assesses moderate autonomism and his beliefs about it. Although his claim may be true in certain instances, I ultimately disagree with his claim because form, understanding, experiences, the time period, and current events surrounding and affecting the audience all have an effect on the reason for aesthetic and moral defectiveness of a piece.

Art can be a means to send messages, often through a contorted reality. Throughout history, art has presided as a chief means to sublimely critique institutions and offer insight or cause reflection. One example of an artist who analyzed and critiqued society was Salvador Dali, a native Spanish citizen who travelled the world and expressed emotions through his surrealist artwork. Dali, a recognized artist in the 1900s, employed art to create outlandish and surreal images that force viewers to confront reality. Through the use of countless symbols and manipulated physical proportions he found ways to critique society. In Geopoliticus Child Watching the Birth of the New Man, Salvador Dali confronts America’s emerging

'Can popular art and culture be politically radical, or is only difficult art capable of being so?'

It is incredible on how one piece of art could rebel so much by just looking at it. Art is beautiful in all the figures and ways possible. Art could be anything that comes into your mind, a drawing, a painting, a photograph, and etc. Art isn’t defined by setting rules of what you could do. For example, I could draw a soccer ball and make it in a way that nobody has seen it before; it would be a piece of art. That’s the best part of it; you’re not limited to what you could create. It is also a way that you could relief your stress and your thoughts. Sometimes we are afraid to rebel who we truly are. The generation we live in today makes us think that everything we do is not good enough. Everyone will judge you no matter what. You could become

Art, in my view, is than an activity of using man-made symbols to represent and transfer ideas. Yet, it is limited by the artist’s ability to manipulate these symbols to express his or her ideas, the clarity with which the symbols themselves express ideas, and the audience’s ability to perceive and understand the ideas that the artist has expressed. Overall, art as I have defined it is limited by our ability to express, transmit, and perceive ideas, as well as the constructs we have created to express ideas. Due to these constraints, it makes it almost impossible, in my view, to create a flawless work of art, where there is no conscious separation between artist and audience. There will always be some conscious separation between artist and audience; yet the great artists, in my view, are able to minimize this conscious separation between themselves and large audiences. Thus, I believe

Sexuality and violence is an integral part of human nature that is distinct yet at the same time linked in many ways to each other. In nature, the majority of alpha males have dominance over the female counterpart whether it is in their daily lives or sexual interactions. To some extent, it is similar in human beings, where power, aggression and authority may force the weak to be subjects of their abuse. Without the protection of law and order, as seen in past human societies, immoral and unethical events would occur. While women had always been the target of sexual abuse since the early ages, males and as well as other gender identities are not uncommon targets. Perpetrators and victims may not always be the ones who we expect them to be. Speaking from a psychological perspective, it is believed by some, such as Sigmund Freud and his followers, that it is the nature of human beings to be motivated by primitive sexuality needs (Mannoni 1971, 146-147). The ones that are weak, physically, mentally and socially are often victims of sexual abuse. Art history had depicted many instances of sexuality and violence that reflected the view of society at that time, since sexuality in text did not simply analyze an already constituted area of cultural knowledge; rather, they actively defined cultural knowledge (Nead 1990, 326). The purpose of this research paper is to review the perspectives of selected art pieces from different eras and compare the impact it brings to the society on

Graffiti, monuments, structures, is it really art or a crime? In this reading, you will find examples and reasons why many think arts can cause conflict and why many might enjoy seeing the different types of art forms. Arts can be beautiful yet cause conflict. When people are against it, they think of the cost of repair when art is formed on buildings and businesses. As well when art is formed some can see it as a form of grieving when major events happen but that can as well cause a bigger conflict. This reading is showing you why art can be a negative impact on the world and many around the world.