The Issue Between Isis And Their Allies

In recent months, the United States accompanied with several allies have been forging a fight against ISIS in Iraqi and Syria. The allied troops have been extremely successful in wreaking havoc against the enemy–killing ISIS fighters, reducing ISIS cash flow, and causing the group to abandon a large portion of their controlled areas. There are approximately 5,000 American troops at any given time in these territories and President Obama wants and intends to deploy more. The United States should not send more troops to fight against ISIS because, we were just involved in the Iraqi War, home soil will be left vulnerable, and intervening doesn't always lead to benefit.

I believe that the United States should use other military forces from other countries to help eliminate ISIS because not only are they becoming a serious problem, but the youth from many countries are leaving home and/or disappearing because they feel the need to help in this movement, and in reality they have no idea what they are signing themselves up for. So in turn the United States should turn to these other countries for help, in the best way

While the United States has taken some action to deal with this pressing issue, it has not been enough thus far. According to the Journal of Strategic Security, specializing in the International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism, point out that military launches through air strikes have managed to lessen ISIS’s control in Iraq and Syria by de-financing the group through limiting their use access oil. However, this alone has not and will not stop the functioning of ISIS. The Journal of Strategic Security expresses that while the military movement was a good effort, ISIS has plans “to expand its support base and intensify its attacks outside of Iraq and Syria.” Simply putting restrictions on ISIS is not enough, just as attacking from the air is counter productive and causing more damage rather than removing ISIS. Likewise, the Journal of Strategic Security continues to discuss that ISIS has a solid group of foreign fights worldwide that are disposable and able to be controlled easily. This leaves room for continual attacks and replenishment of members. Thus, it is imperative that the United States use ground troops to eradicate

In 1945, Syria had a barely functioning civilian government and a military that was always involved in the government’s politics. Syria and Iraq have now made new allies with; Afghanistan, Libya, and Yemen. “ISIS’ involvement in the Syrian Civil War has exacerbated the conflict, leaving over 300,000 dead, two-thirds of the Syrian people in need of humanitarian aid, and some 11 million people uprooted (7 million internally displaced and 4 million refugees abroad)” (Forsythe, Monshipouri 1) which is a very big reason why ISIS needs to be stopped. ISIS killed so many innocent people, just because they wanted to bring terror into the whole worlds lives and wonder what is going to happen next, where is it going to happen, and if it is going to happen to one of us. Our U.S. foreign policy has not effective at ending Syria’s crisis, not even a little bit. After Syria’s uprising, the U.S. and United Nations have thought about resolutions to trying to defeat ISIS but, none of those strategies have worked so far. After the attacks in Paris, on November 13th, it was a lot easier for us to make airstrikes against ISIS. It was also a very big part of why Paris decided to take action and also to airstrike as well. There are also major problems that we have to think about when trying to take over ISIS. We have to think about making an effective size ground force big enough to

We need to assure the people of Syria & Iraq a safe military & not one who will violently kill their own people. Some sort of compromise must be brought upon that makes sure that the civilians of Iraq & Syria will be safe if not any way associated with the terrorist group.

As we know America has attacked ISIS for many times, but the American government have costed too much money. According to Harress (2014), President Obama said if American air attack ISIS for three years that it will cost 10 billion dollars per year. In addition, it will cost $68,000 per hour when America uses F-22 Raptor to attack ISIS. American government pays so much money to attack ISIS, but it also doesn’t destroy ISIS. ISIS also invades some countries, and many people are killed. The American government uses lots of people’s money to do nothing that is not fair for American. It is important that America didn’t destroy ISIS after it cost this money. Harress (2014) discussed white house estimates to pay $58.6 billion for finishing the action, and it has reduced $20 billion. Although America airstrike against ISIS have destroyed some important buildings and troops, it doesn’t make a big influence on ISIS. ISIS still actives in many places, and it is doing many bad things. In addition, ISIS doesn’t target on America, American government still cost lots of money to attack ISIS. If American want to save civilian, who are in Syria, it should provide some food and safety places for civilian. It will cost less money, and Syrian will thank American government. Finally, the cost of airstrike is very high, and it doesn’t change ISIS too much. It is an

Terror groups such as ISIS and Al Qaeda have struck fear deep into the hearts of many Americans. Fear that has turned into hate and ignorance among these same people because they believe that the acts of less than one percent of an entire population have somehow translated onto the other ninety-nine percent. It is this same fear that spreads hurtful messages around the internet:

Recently, much media attention has been given to the radical terrorist group the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

The current struggle relates to all of the topics of committee 1. These things reflect the religious and ethnic persecution due to the fact that this topic causes most of the violence and danger throughout the world peace committee. These factors include drone warfare, cyber warfare, and terrorism due to these religious conflicts. The religious conflicts cause numerous problems that deal with ongoing ISIS crisis, as this terrorist group has spread throughout Libya, Egypt, and are trying to spread their religious group in a negative way. This is causing the corruption throughout Asia, and Africa, and this will change the religion problem and the ethnic tensions between religion and races. This usually focuses on Muslim

Our question concerning ISIS, illustrates a plan on what should be done about them and by whom. As stated previous, instead of counterterrorism and lying low, troops should be put on the grounds to finally control and help stop what the Islamic State have being doing for two years. With realism, it challenges us to have the primary goal of survival. We ought to conquer and be the last to survive. With that being said, States can never be certain about others’ intention, in this case ISIS’s. We will never know when they will attack unless we take control of the situation and take them over. We have the power to take out ISIS and should do it soon while we have time before the next 9-11 happens. At the end of the day we need to realize innocent people are being taken advantage and ISIS is going after the weak. They have no moral believes and will do anything to make a names for themselves like performing suicide missions, blowing up state capitals and highly populated areas. The Islamic State needs to be stop and the United States needs to come in sense with other nation-states to stop this nonsense once and for

By working together with neighboring countries (Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia...etc) we can try and contain ISIS without using violence. If the United States spent as much effort working for diplomacy instead of war we would have peaceful containment in no time. After looking at the diagram “Untangling the Middle East” from theglobeandmail.com the Islamic State has hostile relationships with everyone. Meaning nobody is really for ISIS except ISIS. By cooperating with neighboring countries and working on relations with Syria and Russia the United States could get many different ideas on how to defeat ISIS with nonviolent tactics. Partnering with all these countries who have strong military will show ISIS what they are against. Having political ideas from several different countries will help to defeat ISIS.”Scientific surveys of Iraqi deaths resulting from the first four years of the Iraq War found that between 151,000 to over one million Iraqis died as a result of conflict during this time. A later study, published in 2011, found that approximately 500,000” (Wikipedia). This just goes to show how many people can be hurt by using military options. If countries worked together we could stop the military madness and bring peace without violence through the power of knowledge, and numbers of

ISIS is an unquestionably dangerous and potentially irrational force that needs to be migrated someway. Others may conclude ISIS is not extremely powerful, so why is military intervention needed? Just because ISIS is not extremely powerful now does not mean they won't be someday. A good and accurate example of that is the NAZIs. Yes, the Nazis killed way many more, but just give ISIS time and opportunity; perhaps they'd compete.

In December of 2011, the United States withdrew all remaining combat troops from Iraq. After eight years of war, the United States turned the responsibility for the defense of Iraq over to the Iraqi security forces. Iraq immediately saw the rise of sectarian violence among Sunnis and Shia. This nation also saw the reemergence of the insurgency known as Al Qaeda in Iraq in the northwest portion of the country. The problems in Iraq grew with the igniting of a civil war in the neighboring nation of Syria. This civil war allowed for members of Al-Qaeda in Iraq to spread to and develop in an unstable area and emerging as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, ISIS. Within twelve months, ISIS grew by creating of an organizational structure, engaging in violent military campaigns, developing an economy and establishing successful recruitment techniques. ISIS now controls large swaths of territory in both northwest Iraq and Eastern Syria. Political leadership in the United States is now debating what action should be taken to combat the terror group ISIS. To prevent ISIS from harming our national security, to stop the threat of international terrorism and to stop the destruction of Iraq and its people The United States should send ground troops to Iraq to combat ISIS.

Utter the word “Muslim” and immediately bodies stiffen, lips curve downwards, brows furrow, and the word “terrorist” comes to mind for many Americans. Since the tragedy of 9/11 thirteen years ago, Americans have generally become even more fearful of Muslims, and after wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the public opinion of Muslims tends to be more negative. A poll by the Arab American Institute in 2014 reveals that only 27% of Americans feel favorably toward Islam –a dramatic drop from the 47% registered in an ABC poll a month after 9/11 in 2001 (Obeidallah “13 Years”). This sharp decline at best shows a growing distrust of, and at worst, a deepening prejudice toward Islam. Negativity toward Islam spawns from a fear in many people who consider

War and conflict have raged in Southeast and Central Asia for centuries due to civil unrest and political instability. The rise of the Taliban and other militant insurgencies have escalated the dangers and unpredictability of an already unstable government in Afghanistan. The agenda of these jihadist extremists is the takeover of the Afghan and Pakistan governments in favor of the more stringent Islamic ways of the Taliban, and the destruction of anyone who opposes them. These groups, professing to do the work of God, are perpetrating a coarse and distorted interpretation of Islam and the Quran. Violent acts that have been committed by insurgents, include crimes against humanity, acts of terrorism, murder, suicide bombings, and