Essay: Why There Should Be More Gun Control Laws

Gun control should not exist at all in the United States. Mass shootings have almost become seen as normal event in the United States. What people do not understand is that gun control is not the answer; there are countries with little to no control that have fewer shootings. According to The Washington Post,Finland is ranked number 4 in countries with the most guns despite that they only had 24 homicides by firearm (“Gun homicides and ownership by countries” n.pag.) . In the article Did Gun Control Work In Australia “it is shown that gun control has reduced the problems but it still has not completely got rid of all firearm deaths”(Matthews n.pag.). The number of murders, homicides, or suicides do not go up due to people just owning more guns. Clayton Perry, a staff writer at the University of Maine, even points out “Stricter gun laws were in place during the Assault Weapons Ban between 1994 and 2004, but that didn't stop the shooters at Columbine in 1999 ”(Perry n. pag.). In Iceland, thirty out of a hundred people own a gun and they have zero homicides caused by guns a year(“Gun Homicides and ownership by country” n. pag.). In this day and age, everything is unpredictable, guns are a form of protection for everyone and there should not be restrictions on protection. The U.S. Department of Justice released a data brief that states, “ On average in 1987-92 about 83,000 crime victims per year used a firearm to defend themselves or their property”(Rand BJS Statistician n. pag.). The National Sheriffs Association released that the average police response time is at eighteen minutes while the average school shooting only last twelve minutes (“Embracing Technology To Decrease Response Time” n. pag.). Gun control should not exist because other countries do fine without it , high gun ownership has no link with increasing death rates , and guns are not harmful when instructions are followed.

The first reason that there should be more gun control laws is that it would prevent thousands of deaths. For example, “guns are the leading cause of death by homicide and by suicide;” along with that, firearms are the “12th leading cause of all deaths [overall]” (Gun Control, n.p.). With this in mind, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated that there were “270,237 firearm suicides in the United States,” including more than half of the total suicides throughout the years of 1999 and 2013 (Centers for Disease, n.p.). As a result, it would also decrease gun violence significantly and reduce the costs of gun violence-related expenses. According to the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, “gun violence cost each person in the United States around $564” (Gun Control, n.p.). Ted Miller also estimated that the “annual firearm injury costs an average of $645 per gun, in America” (PIRE, n.p.). Not to mention, statistics show that “every day, 315 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides and suicide

First off having gun control would lessen the number of yearly deaths caused by guns, it would also lessen the number of mass shootings. “United Nations study revealed that the US had 3.21 firearm homicides per 100,000 people in 2010.” stated Richard Pérez-Peña. Having stricter gun laws would also help reduce the number of homicides. “Advocates say that tougher gun laws in other countries keep death rates down there. Australia, for example, had 13 mass shootings between 1979 and 1996. But after a gunman killed 35 people in 1996, the country passed strict laws banning many weapons. Its hasn’t had a mass shooting since.” explained Richard Pérez-Peña. In

Did you know there was a whopping amount of school shootings in 2015 that we could have avoided. With more gun control laws this nation would be a safer nation. In one year alone there was 372 mass shootings with 475 killed and 1,870 wounded, just in 2015. Also there were 62 school shootings with over 20 people dead and even more wounded. The moral of all this is the less guns we have the safer it will be for this community, for that we would need more gun control laws.

People have argued for decades whether we should or shouldn’t enact more gun control laws. More gun control laws should be enacted because it could reduce gun violence along with reducing the amount of deaths and crimes caused by guns and reduce teenagers from obtaining guns.

Many think that if gun control laws were put into place then it will save lives. However that is not exactly true. Handguns purchases should not be limited. “Most handguns used in crimes are stolen and passed frequently from criminal to criminal or purchased not by mass gun buyers but by a friend or relation-which would not be affected by ‘one handgun a month’.” By limiting the purchase of handguns, it will not save people from killing others. Either way with or without gun control laws, people are going to steal guns to kill. Concealed guns should be allowed. “‘Shall Issue’ concealed carry laws, which allow ANY law abiding citizen to carry a concealed pistol, have spread to 40 states across the US since 1987. Millions of ‘average’ Americans exercise this right, and there have been no explosions of crime, shootouts over parking spots, or road rage gunfights.” People throughout the years have carried a handgun, and it has not been a problem yet. Therefor, why change it if it is not a problem. With more guns does not mean more accidental shootings. “But it is a fact that gun accidents have reduced in a number much faster than gun ownership has increased. And in every household there are dangerous items- household cleaners, swimming pools, and other items that cause many more accidental deaths than guns….” There are more than guns that are dangerous, but nobody is going to take them away due to their enjoyment of it. Why not make laws about swimming pools or household cleaners? An abundant amount of people think that most deaths are caused by guns, and that’s why they want gun control laws

There needs to be a change to the laws that we follow today and one of those laws is the gun control law. We need to have stricter gun control laws because it will prevent more people from being able to acquire a firearm. In Today’s generation, everyone seems to have a gun, whether they use it for protection or just to make stupid decisions. We have teenagers robbing people at gunpoint, kids bringing guns to schools because they want to show it off to their friends or

A social problem is defined as a condition that citizens, or people of a community perceive as being negative or undesirable. There are many different types of social problems such as: poverty, domestic violence, abortion, discrimination, racism, gun control and gun rights. Guns have been a hotly debated topic for decades now. There are many different reasons for why it is such a prevalent issue such as, safety, constitutional rights, self defense, mental health, and many more. The two sides of gun control and gun rights see the social issue differently. One side views guns as a safety hazard that needs to be fixed, and the pro gun side view that guns are a Constitutional right that should not be infringed. No matter what side you are on it is impossible to ignore this problem in our society today.

Nearly 10,150 people have died and 20,647 have been injured because of causes related to guns in 2015 so far. Furthermore there have been around 266 mass shootings in the United States. In consequence to all of these deaths and injuries caused by guns ,the topic of gun rights has slowly become one of the most popular and controversial topics in today 's society. The big problem is that the nation is split when it comes to opinions on gun rights. Some believe that it is a constitutional right to be able to bear guns in order to protect themselves and their loved ones . Others believe that citizens shouldn 't be able to carry weapons because it just leads to problems. Gun control is a huge issue in the United States and should be addressed promptly.

There should be more strict gun control and there should be more laws on them because some people get out of control and kill others . This is not good because the over killing of people is what leads to many massacres and suicides. Also keeping a gun around around the house can also lead to suicidal thoughts. More than 2,000 kids die each year because of guns and over 50% of these deaths ere caused by suicidal thoughts.(Mayo..)More than 100,000 deaths happen a year because of guns in the US alone. There should be more protection on guarding guns and so that only qualified people can get there hand on a gun.Research shows ”Every day 282 people die from gun violence: 32 are murdered; 51 kill themselves; 2 die accidentally; 1, intent unknown as said on” .( Brady…)All though owning a gun protected in the constitution they still should have more controver it. On the other hand owning a gun does give you some protection and allows you to stay safe at home knowing if someone were going to break into your house that you have a weapon to stop them with. Even though that it helps you protect yourself more people die a year from suicidal thoughts then they protect themself. Owning a gun is not good but there is still is some good parts about owning a weapon. Here are some reasons that there should be more strict gun control.

During the Vietnam War, more than twice as many Americans were killed with firearms in the U.S. than died in combat. Today, firearms are used in approximately 65% of the 11,000 homicides a year. Suicides are carried out via a gun 57% of the 16,600 a year (“GunCite” 49). These statistics pose the question, “Would there be that many fewer deaths if guns were banned altogether? Or would these deaths occur just the same but by other means?” Studies on both a local and a national level have shown that the majority of murders are committed by those with previous criminal records. The “crimes of passion” are not very common; rather, most murders are planned and therefore would occur no matter what weapon is to be used (“GunCite” 49).

Firearms are dangerous weapons used to intentionally and unintentionally kill people, which lead to one of America�s most heated debates: gun control. With increasing crime and violence, many people look to gun control laws as a way to slow these trends down. On the other hand, others believe that owning a gun is a constitutional right that should never be taken away. James Q. Wilson�s essay �Just Take Away Their Guns� is an attempt to offer a solution to both sides of this argument. He claims that illegal possession of firearms is the problem and that frisking suspicious characters would be a good solution to the debate of gun control. However, random frisking to end illegal gun possession is a violation of privacy and an overbearing task

The talk of gun control has been a controversial issue since the 20th century. As quoted by George Washington in 1790, “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined…” The second amendment in the right to bear arms was created so that citizens could have protection of oneself. Gun control issues have been uprising because of the mass shootings that have occurred These shootings are thought to be happening because of the access to firearms. Could these events be prevented if there were stricter laws and limitations on gun control? No, if someone wants access to a gun, they will find a way. Taking away citizens’ guns would not stop someone from finding a firearm to create mass destruction. There needs to be more regulations on who can legally obtain guns, but not a complete abolition of the right to bear arms. Also, there needs to be regulations as to which types of guns can legally be obtained in each state. Gun control will not fix or prevent deaths by guns; it will just enrage people who are advocates for having their gun rights.

Increasing the amount of firearm regulation in America has been a topic covered highly by news organizations, politicians, and media over the past few years. This is due to a growing occurrence of mass shootings and gun-related violence. One side believes that if The United States enforces more strict gun regulations, it will reduce the amount of gun-related violence within its cities and states. The other side believes that more gun control will have little to no effect on the reduction of shootings within The United States. Gun control laws are highly ineffective and, if anything, only push back that acts of violence. Creating stricter gun control laws will not decrease the amount of gun violence and mass shootings in The United States because shootings have everything to do with the person and nothing to do with the gun.

Robert A. Heinlein once said “ an armed society is a polite society.Manners are good When one may have to back up his acts with his life.” Gun control in the United States has been around since the 18th century. America has seen more than 1,001 mass shootings over the past 10 years.The Gun Control Act of 1968 was made for the purpose of “keeping firearms out of the hands of those not legally entitled to possess them because of age, criminal background,and incompetence.” The act also placed a specific limit on the sale of guns and gun dealer licensing and record keeping. Despite the amount ofI shootings in America, Gun Control laws are too strict. Gun control laws should be less regulated ; theorize that there would be less crime,less mass shootings and a better sense of security : If there are less regulations than one could protect themselves, which would lessen crime rate, with less laws, there would be far less mass shootings due to an armed citizens, with lenient gun regulations one would have a better sense of security