The Issue Of Using Traditional Ways For Running The Pharmaceutical Industry

This paper hopes to share insight into the steps that are taken by companies, and the strenuous process behind developing an effective new drug.

There are multiple health concerns worldwide and more and more drugs are needed every day. Many drugs however, are extremely expensive to develop, test, and produce. According to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (2002), it costs up to $802 million to bring a new drug to the market. In 2002, pharmaceutical companies spent $34 billion in research and development (Center-Watch, 2003). In addition to the costs, the overall time from the discovery to approve and market the drug can take up to 15 years.

Improvements in health care and life sciences are an important source of gains in health and longevity globally. The development of innovative pharmaceutical products plays a critical role in ensuring these continued gains. To encourage the continued development of new drugs, economic incentives are essential. These incentives are principally provided through direct and indirect government funding, intellectual property laws, and other policies that favor innovation. Without such incentives, private corporations, which bring to market the vast majority of new drugs, would be less able to assume the risks and costs necessary to continue their research and development (R&D). In the United States, government action has focused on creating the environment that would best encourage further innovation and yield a constant flow of new and innovative medicines to the market. The goal has been to ensure that consumers would benefit both from technological breakthroughs and the competition that further innovation generates. The United States also relies on a strong generic pharmaceutical industry to create added competitive pressure to lower drug prices. Recent action by the Administration and Congress has accelerated the flow of generic medicines to the market for precisely that reason. By contrast, in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and

U.S. based companies hold rights to most of the world’s rights on new medicines and holds thousands of new products currently being developed. As of 2012, the industry helps support almost 3.4 million jobs in the U.S. economy. It is also one of the most heavily R&D based industries in the world. In the United States, the environment for pharmaceuticals is much friendlier than other countries around the world in terms of pricing ability and regulations. Both the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology industries have experienced significant growth in the past year with year-over-year increases of 13.02% and 34.69% respectively. It is an even more striking when looking at the past five years considering both have beat out the S&P 500 with pharmaceuticals increasing an additional 31.44% and the biotechnology sector besting an astonishing 269.3% more return than the

Extremely risky drug discovery and development, lengthening development times which increase development cost, return on investments, and generic competitors.

Actually the transition from laboratory accomplishment towards human clinical trials has develop into so complicated manners that former NIH Director Elias Zerhouni has designate it the "valley of death. University’s laboratories are examining cells and enzymes and investigate models of human diseases in animals. Usually, after these discoveries, the duty of testing the potential drug in humans is a part of industries. But from the last few years Pharmaceutical companies are focusing on the drug which already passed the regulatory hurdles due to increasing clinical trial cost, expiration of patent and regulatory stringency. New trend has come up that big pharmaceutical companies are willing buy small pharmaceutical company whose research is in final stage and promising the drug approval from the FDA. According to Center Watch, the clinical trial business association, the figure of clinical trials including the United States and worldwide studies, decrease in 2012 compared to previous four years. These developments disturb researchers who have newly identified compounds in the laboratory that they were thinking that it could be effective to treat dengue viruses, west Nile virus, and hepatitis C virus. These new innovative compounds can be drug by exploring a different route i.e. university, industry, and equipped capabilities, Drug improvement Ventures may be able to survive the economic environment by

We analyzed the Indian Pharmaceutical industry on these five forces and the findings of industry competitiveness and profitability are written under the relevant competitive forces.

In order to decide on the R&D portfolio, an objective quantitative analysis might not be suitable considering the high levels of uncertainities and consequently the risks involved in pharmaceutical research projects. It is important to have a qualitative analysis of the situation as a whole that includes Vertex’s own financial position, strategic implications, a quantitative analysis of its Portfolios with realistic estimations and a risk analysis of the portfolios.

Introduction AstraZeneca PLC (AstraZeneca, AZN:NYSE, AZN:LSE) is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. It was formed in 1999 from the merger of Sweden’s Astra AB and UK’s Zeneca Group plc. Core Activities AstraZeneca is engaged in the discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of prescription pharmaceuticals and biological products for important areas of healthcare: Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, Infection, Neuroscience, Oncology, and Respiratory and Inflammation. One of the key benefits of the merger between Astra and Zeneca is seen as their portfolio of new products in development: AstraZeneca call this their 'product pipeline'.

Drug portfolio management is one of the most important determinants of long-term prosperity of research-oriented pharmaceutical companies.

The global pharmaceutical industry is one that is seen to be riddled with misunderstanding and confusion; however, many of the questions emerging companies have can be answered by a thorough analysis of this industry and how these companies compare to one another on many different fronts. Analyzing the global pharmaceutical industry can bring to light how we in the United States compare on the grounds of industry attractiveness to our global counterparts.

The research and development of the pharmaceutical industry is very important as the industry relies on it to develop new products to maintain and sustain the growth of the industry (ALRC 2014). According to the Australian Government Law Reform Commission, every year, the total spending in research and development in pharmaceutical industry, which includes drug discovery, pre-clinical testing and clinical trials on drugs is around $300 million (ALRC 2014). Mergers and acquisitions are intensifying in the global pharmaceutical industry, especially over the last 10 years. With factors like exorbitant research and development costs, the relatively shorter product life cycles, and the rarity of discovering a new life-changing drug acting as catalysts, leading pharmaceutical companies now have more cause to step out and look for external collaboration. This results in an increasing number of smaller biotechnology companies merging with bigger pharmaceutical companies (The

This report provides an analytical strategic review of the global pharmaceutical industry; its origin, evolution,

Although R&D has been retained by the large pharmaceutical firms, there has been a continuous decline in the R&D productivity. Controlling R&D is imperative to the success of a Pharmaceutical firm. However, as the pharmaceutical industry is maturing, there are diminishing returns to the R&D investment. Fewer and fewer blockbuster drugs are being discovered and therefore R&D is not the most value adding component in the value

activities and tactics such as sampling and sales force promotion [3]. Whether a brand manager is using right promotional tools, whether 4P`s (now 7P`s are considered) are linked to each other and with product strategies for the two main objectives that includes [3]:  To Generate Prescription  Make the product reach the patient They can be said as Product chain and Prescription chain 1.1 The Product Chin This starts from selection of molecules and ends in the hands of patient. This chain is somehow intensive as it starts from the selection of molecules, then molecules are critically screened, after the screening of molecules the source of raw material is identified then the pilot batch manufacturing process starts at this stage pricing strategies and clinical trials are worked out. Once the pilot batch is manufactured then it starts with the commercialization of product, after commercialization product goes to distribution house and then it reaches the retailers. After patient’s diagnosis by doctor, patient purchases that product from retailer [4]. 1.2