The Issue of Media and Responsible News Coverage

Hour by hour minute by minute the media blinds us with propaganda and manipulates us into believing a biased opinion. People see this everyday with tabloids and the media. They lie to us with one sided opinions in politics for a quick buck and they lure people away from the truth. America needs to start thinking for themselves and stop letting the media control their lives. The media is creating filters and providing fake news on important situations in the world. And Americans need to wake up and solve this

Media has been playing a significant role in our daily lives by developing our personalities, enriching our knowledge and providing us with different sorts of information. It has a tremendous power in framing cultural guidelines and shaping political dissertation. If the information provided to the U.S. citizens is distorted, then they cannot make informed decisions on the matters of public policy. Thus, it becomes vital to the American democracy that the news media and its institutions remain unbiased, fair and accurate. Media bias happens when a media systematically and persistently emphasize one particular point of view that is usually below the standards of professional journalism. There can be various reasons for media bias, some of

Media bias cripples our ability to find information about politics. Prejudice among different news sources, such as The Hill, NY Times, and CNN makes it difficult to see beyond opinionated information and determine what’s really true. I personally find it exasperating to read about or watch the news and stay updated on current events, especially with controversial topics, with all the sifting between what’s real, and what happens to be false or skewed information due to beliefs held by the individuals in charge of covering these issues. From what I can tell by looking at the three former sources I’ve chosen, the use of word choice among certain topics and their way of labeling certain groups or individuals varies, even if they might be describing the same event or news story that’s going on at that time.

The 1987 film Broadcast News focuses on the inner workings of a broadcast news department as it shows various friendship and romantic relationships within the workplace. By showing the personal lives as well as professional performances of broadcast reporters in this fictional drama, the film delves into a few key ethical dilemmas. The main characters are Jane Craig, a producer, Aaron Altman, a broadcast reporter, and Tom Grunick, a newcomer to the news reporting profession. Perhaps one of the ethical issue most pivotal to the plot is when Tom decides to stage a shot of him crying in order to splice it in as a reaction to an emotional story told by one of his interviewees in a story he was running about “date rape”. Although doing so compromises

“Public opinion is formed and expressed by machinery. The newspapers do an immense amount of thinking for the average man and woman. In fact, they supply them with such a continuous stream of standardized opinion, bourne along upon an equally inexhaustible flood of news and sensation, collected from every part of the world every hour of the day, that there is neither the need nor the leisure for personal reflection. All this is but part of a tremendous educating process. It is an education at once universal and superficial. It produces enormous numbers of standardized citizens, all equipped with regulation opinions, prejudices and sentiments according to their class or party.” – Winston S. Churchill

Plaguing over 310 million Americans with an STD so horrifying, it is everywhere - nearly every news channel, nearly every newspaper, and nearly every news websites gives it to the people. This STD is one that has grown to the government, grown to the politics and grown to the society of our county. This STD is softness, transience and distortion within the media in our country. Every single American is prone to this sickening disease. By softening the news, breaking stories in a transient time without full accuracy and distorting the meaning of stories the news has made the American people a recipient of an STD.

Media has become an integral part of the lives of both Americans and people all around the world. It has its influences on different aspects of a person’s aspect on life. Many political analysts have looked at the influence of media on elections, especially as the media has become more prominent in the world. With technology becoming more and more a n integral part of the daily life of a person, this subject will become that much more relevant. We live in a time where almost every person in the developing and developed world has consistent access to a television, and therefore has that constant exposure to media. Almost everywhere a person goes, they will be exposed to the media. There are several factors that have been examined to determine the exact role that the media holds in the outcome of elections. One theory on the subject is that the national media has a different role than local medias do when it comes to levels on influence on elections The other two theories that will be discussed are media bias and that the amount of exposure to media has an effect on the amount of influence. Another theory is that the existence of a correlation is a false perception. All of these theories will be analyzed in this paper, as well as others. Different studies and analysis have different explanations for the correlation between media influence and elections. The factors analyzed have been viewed to show different variations in the relationship between the two. The findings of

In order to apply the aforementioned questions to this case, we must first examine it through the lens of the SPJ Code of Ethics, and determine where it violates—or abides by—it’s four tenants. The Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) lays out the four rules a journalist must follow in order to act ethically: seek truth and report it, minimize harm, act independently, and be accountable and transparent (“SPJ Code of

In today’s society, remaining connected and knowledgeable of current events and the newest trends is vital to staying ahead in business, education, and social standing. This information is supplied to everyone through the internet, newspapers, television, and radio. One can tune into stations such as CNN, NBC, Fox News, Al-Jazeera, and many others (“SQs of Media Outlets”). In order to meet the needs of viewers, readers, and listeners, the ideal media system would contain accurate, quick information, with a purely impartial view on the facts as they are known. However, this modern media system has not maintained an objective view, pushing opinionated and slanted reporting onto the population in order to create profit and gain customers. The exploitation of information media for personal gain has created a toxic and inaccurate present, constant in today’s society.

Over the course of the past years media has taken the nation by storm. Now that we have everything right in front of us, we are able to easily post on all social media roots to share a topic or a comment on a subject. Repetitively many people on social media are used to taking content that is not theirs originally, instead of making their own. This has effect on many. Rapidly it has caused debate on issues everywhere, causing bias to seem good, bad and different in lack of perception. Media bias is out of control! The media today often become so consumed with pleasing people. Viewpoint of another can be immoral and affect many.

For the majority of history, newspapers have reported hard facts. Newspapers were a trusted source that society depended on to form their own opinion. More than ever, today it seems to be more difficult to find facts or truth. Just on that statement two significant and impactful questions are raised. Why is there so much bias and discrepancies between reporting and why is society fine with this? Anyone who pays attention to the reporting that is going on, they would notice the first question, but do not take it a moment to question why the public or themselves allow it. This all ties back to newspapers because they are beginning of this disaster. Although there hundreds of colleges and universities offer reporting degrees, these two questions are the heart of the matter and affecting society negatively.

When the September 11 attacks happened the Spotlight’s reporting was forced to a stop because it was a tragic time for the nation and for many Americans. Many Americans during 2001 were Catholics and looked at Cardinal Bernard Law as a figure of support and stability during these dreadful times. This shows a situation ethics because the Spotlight team’s priority was to report on a story that involves sexual abuse within the Catholic churches, but had to de-prioritize the story due to the September 11 attacks. In class, we discussed when The New York Times discovered that President Kennedy approved an undercover invasion of Cuba, but the editors had to decide whether the interests of the government or the right of the people to know was more important. The class discussion is similar to the movie because both portray situation ethics, which follows a specific set of rules, but is willing to make exceptions to the rules in given situations if the story is more at that moment or if the consequence is of greater concern.

The news has a responsibility to provide accurate information to the American people. However, journalists are only human, and it is important to take note of any biases present in their writing. W.L. Bennett is one scholar who addressed this concern, arguing that journalism has four main media biases: personalization, dramatization, fragmentation, and authority-disorder bias (Bennett, 2012). While Bennett voices concerns of adverse consequences, scholars Ozen Bas and Maria Elizabeth Grabe argue that biases like personalization can help people with lower education levels retain information better (Bas & Grabe, 2015). Referencing two news clips and an article, this essay argues that media biases rampant across platforms have good intent to get

People who perceive media bias will factor in the news source when they attempt to formulate opinions of ideological bias in the news content. This idea is called the hostile media phenomenon or hostile media effect. In a groundbreaking study in 1985, researchers, Vallone, Ross, and Lepper, postulated that when there is a controversial issue, a partisan is more likely to perceive bias against their viewpoint, even if the information is coming from an objective news source. The causes effects of the hostile media are far-ranging and several researchers have come to different conclusions about them. Researchers like Kevin Coe, David Tewksbury, Bradley J. Bond, Kristin L. Drogos, Robert W. Porter, Ashley Yahn, and Yuanyuan Zhang in their 2008

The media, defined as any organization producing a form of mass communication, is a controversial, board, and a context system. According to a September 2016 Gallup Poll, 32% of the respondents said they have a “great deal” or “a fair amount” of trust in the media (Swift). In fact, there has been a steady decline in trust in the media by the public since the turn of the century (Swift, 2016). As the media’s trust has fallen the perception and the notion of bias in media has increased. For this context, bias is defined as favoring one ideology, candidate, or party over the other in an unfair manner. Furthermore, it could be also mean portraying an ideology, candidate, or party over the other in an unfair manner. It is frequently debated whether or not the media or the public is biased, however, upon further examination, it is both the public and the media who is bias because of the hostile media phenomenon and confirmation bias for the public and the market and ideology for the media.