The Jung Typology Test Adequate Depiction Of My Personality

The Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test provided me with unexpected results. The test showed me that I am more of an extravert over introvert, I have a “slight preference of sensing over intuition”, I have “no preference of thinking over feeling”, and I have “slight preference of judging over perceiving.” These results surprised me slightly while also telling me things I already expected.

With my personality type I have very few close friends. I am loyal and ready to do anything and short notice to help a friend in need. Jung Typology Test (JTT) confirms that theory, stating that I dislike confrontation; with my personality type if a friend gets into a fight I would not necessarily put myself in danger, however I would do what I could to assist and aid my friend. I highly disagree with the JTT result about this finding. If a friend was to get into a fight I would be the first person to assist my friend, even putting myself in danger to protect my friend. Out of all my

As requested, I took the Jung Typology Assessment. The results revealed my personality to be ISFJ (Introverted Sensing Feeling Judging). The first characteristic listed is the desires to serve others. An ISFJ is loyal, sometimes taken for granted, bad at delegating, but produces superior quality work. Methodical, accurate, and possess an excellent memory are more characteristics of the ISFJ personality type. They work well in a small group and make reliable coworkers; however, they tend to be awkward in a supervisory capacity. Not only is an ISFJ a great employee but they are extremely family oriented and dedicated to their intimate group of friends. If a friend or family member is in need of emotional support an ISFJ is by their side without

According to the Jung Typology Test, my four letter personality type is ISFJ. I was not surprised with my results at all and found them to be very accurate and represent me as a person. As an introvert, “I often prefer doing things alone or with one or two people (CITE). As a student, being an introvert is a disadvantage for me because I do not work well with large study groups and instead rather lock myself in a room and study alone. With sensing, “I learn best when I see how to use what I’m learning” (CITE) and only complete things using what I know from experience. By only using my experience when completing assignments or school work hinders my experience as a student by limiting my ability to learn new material. Through feeling, I tend

Hello, I’m Joshua Dudley and the results I got for my Jung Typology Test was on point for the kind of person I am. In the Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test my letters were ENFJ. ENFJs are the benevolent 'pedagogues' of humanity. They have tremendous charisma by which many are drawn into their nurturant tutelage and/or grand schemes. Many ENFJs have tremendous power to manipulate others with their phenomenal interpersonal skills and unique salesmanship (butt). All of the letters have different meanings. (E)- Extravert (34%), (N)- iNtuitive (9%), (F)- Feeling (19%), and (J)- Judging (28%) and these for letters ENFJ make up the type of person I am. I also had to find a two letter temperament for my personality. The two Letters I think that fit me is (NF)- “The Idealists” which my primary

results I received did not surprise me too much because I have taken a few personalities based

Recently, I have taken the Jung typology personality test. It showed that I was ISTJ. This acronym stands for introvert, sensing, thinking, and judging. I feel as though the results were thoroughly correct. Introvert perfectly explains the type of person I have been throughout my life. I have always liked working by myself instead of in groups and I have very few close relationships with people. The sensing category was also true of my character because i tend to notice small details and I am a very practical, realistic type of person. As far as the thinking category, I always judge things rationally and

The online Jung Typology Test was a very interesting exercise. The test pointed out certain things about my personality type that I will be examining in the course of this class. It may give me some important insights into my personal and professional decisions about family, career and life. I have worked in municipal government for over 38 years. I have done budgets, human resources, and day to day supervision of several city departments. The majority of that time has been within management of two major international airports. In that time I managed employees, and I was managed by executive level leadership. Employee supervision was a great learning experience. I supervised employees who came to work to do their jobs, and other subordinates

Jung typology test has become something that organizations have been using in order to assist with determining the different personality types where individuals are concerned. While this is not the first time I have engaged in this kind of personality assessment, there is a welcomed refreshment to be reminded about who I am. The results from the human-metrics typology test by Jung revealed that I am the INTJ type. In breaking down the letters and the categories this is the result.

One of the two self-assessment test that I’ve taken is the “Jung Typology test”, and it gives me my results back about my personalities. Those results are ESEP (Extraverted, Sensing, Feeling, Perceiving) and these results are very accurate, because most of the time I’m very apprehensive when it comes to reality that is superficial through senses. By feelings, decision-making in concentration of individual beings, is supplementary to sensing. By thinking, prepare to pursue authorization of the unassailability of problematical making decisions. These types are the key for easy communication such as, coming up with trusting relationships and having a group of connections. The second test that I’ve taken was the Interest Profiler, and my results came out to be Social and Investigative. Social is being a helper, enjoy helping people, working in groups with others, and have verbal and communication skills come naturally. Investigative is being a thinker, enjoy learning, and prefer working on my own pace. These results are accurate, because even though I like working

I was very happy to have been given the opportunity to take these self-assessment tests. I always had an idea as far as what my personality is defined as, but it’s interesting to see where my strengths and weaknesses are. With the Jungian Typology test I scored 59% Introvert, 34% Sensing, 19% Thinking, and 31% Judging. After receiving this score and reading how each is defined, none of this surprised me. Sharing the results with my mother, her response was, “No surprise there!” I have always tried having some understanding of my personality in hopes of finding the right career path for me. I must admit that this has opened my eyes to how detail oriented and focused I can be, especially if it’s something I care about. This can be both good

Many different people have extremely different personality types such as, perfectionist, helper, leader, adventurer, and peacemaker. I am a variety of personalities from perfectionist to unorthodox. Due to the Jung Typology personality test, I am very extroverted and intuitive and I tend to get conflicted. Also, I am confident and sympathetic. I am extremely sociable and I enjoy the comfort of talking to friends. Even though sometimes I may be confused, I have the strength to straighten out. I have the kind of personality that will allow people to be who they want to be. I look at people the way they want to be looked at unconditionally. Last, I tend to get nervous and worried in tense situations. I have always been this way, but it goes away

The difference between the Jung Typology test and the Big Five test distributed in class are the variables that each test evaluates. Within the variables tested, the Jung test evaluated eight different characteristics (Extraversion/Introversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, Judging/Perceiving) while the Big Five test calculated five different traits (Extroversion, Agreeableness, Conscientious, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience). Upon taking/completion of the Big Five test, I saw that my scores were very similar to the scores I received on the Jung test. Levels of introversion outweighed extroversion, and new traits such as Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience were scored above average. In terms of similarity, the traits of both tests seem to cohere to one another resulting in promising results. Though the Jung test may have more testable traits, I believe that the Jung test and the Big Five test lie on the same spectrum in terms of producing convincing

Based on the Jungian personality assessment, my Jung type is INTP; which is amazingly spot on. The INTP personality type is one of the rarest, making up only three percent of the population, which is exactly how I’d like it. Just the thought of being “common” makes me cringe. A prime example of this is my preferred name, Curtis. My full name is Jon Curtis Miller and I prefer to go by my middle name. For as long as I can remember, when asked why I go by my middle name instead of my first, my response has always been, “There are too many Jon’s in the world, I’m not another Jon.” I pride myself on being unique.

My personality archetype, according to the Jung Typology test is an ESTP. As an extravert I was ranked in the 84 percentile, sensing 28 percentile, thinking 53 percentile, and perceiving at only 3 percentile. I seem to have no preference of perceiving over judging. Due to the low percentile of perceiving over judging, more than one personality type could apply; I have the tendency to swing between ESTP and ESTJ. Approximately 4.3 percent of the population falls into the category of ESTP.