The Justification Of Nazi Officer 's Actions During World War II

Many various members of the populace who believed that only a few would rais it to the highest level of 450 volts, were wrong in their predictions. The majority of subjects obeyed the experimenters' orders to the very end of the experiment by administering the highest voltage three times. As the first experiments were conducted on Yale undergraduates, some believed that the results were inconclusive due to the competitive nature of the students. However, the results of the experiment were the same when Milgram tested "ordinary" people. When the experiments were repeated in other areas of the world, the level of obedience was even higher than those

In many situations, there have been authority figures with mass followings. Often the power the leader holds over their followers can influence them to do negative things. Many people believe that they can be independent enough to resist any pressure put on them by an authoritative figure. If this was true, then why do genocides mark the pages of history books around the world? Stanley Milgram sought to answer this budding question. He used his scientific authority to conduct an experiment which would reveal that most people would succumb to authority and obey their commands. This contradicts what most people would like to believe about themselves and their morals. Many people believe that they would never harm another human being, even under pressure from an authoritative figure, the Stanley Milgram Experiment proves that this is false. Although the experiment left its participants psychologically harmed, the results discovered why genocides continue to happen. Most people collapse under the pressure and obey any command given to them rather than doing what they believe is right.

To understand why we have a sense of conformity, we must first understand value. “Values are used to learn people’s culture, ideas, and what they want out of life (Henslin 49). Every culture has similar and different values. “Norms are the expectations a group develops concerning the ‘right’ way to reflects its values” (Henslin49). An example of a norm would be personal space and speaking quietly in certain places such as a library. When norms are violated people often begin to question the person’s sanity and well-being based on how extreme the norm violation was.

Now as the voltage would increase, the fake screams of the learner (the accomplice) would become louder and more agonizing so that the “teacher” would get tricked into thinking he was actually causing the learner physical pain. The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether the “teacher” would continue to administer the shocks each time the voltage increased even though he could hear the learners screams just because the experimenter/ authoritative figure would instruct him to do so. The result of the experiment was that 62.5% of the “teachers” went to the max voltage (450 volts) even though the “learner” was instructed to stay quiet once the voltage got above 300 volts to make it seem as if the “learner” had lost consciousness which proved that the majority of people would in fact, listen to what an authoritative figure tells them to do even though it could be causing another severe pain. What you can take away from this is that in the end, the majority of the “teachers” (participants) were willing to administer a fatal shock and potentially end someone’s life just because an authoritative figure instructed them to which proved Stanley Milgram’s purpose of the experiment. Now this experiment was said to be unethical because of the fact that Milgram deceived the participants and tricked them into believing that they could have actually murdered another human being. The experience of

After each wrong question they were instructed to go higher on the voltage of shock. The learners would begin to scream and cry after so many shocks that high on the voltage so the teacher would look at the person in charge and the person would tell them to proceed on with the experiment. More then half of the subjects administered all thirty levels of shock. Milgram conclude that any of us would obey authority to harm

Stanley Milgram, a well-known social psychologist within the 1960’s focused his studies on social influence and obedience to authority. The impact of his research and experiments made such a profound discovery finding

Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a study focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. The experiment began in July 1961, a

In pursuit of information, he traveled to Paris, France and Oslo, Norway to study differing conformity rates between countries(Rogers 2016, p 3). Milgram found Norway and the US had similar conformity rates and the French conformed the least(Rogers 2016, p 3). After his graduation from Harvard in 1960, Milgram became an assistant professor at Yale, where he was able to further develop his interest in obedience (Rogers 2016, p 4). Living through WWII and the Holocaust with his Jewish heritage made Milgram more curious about obedience to authority and how it applied in this particular scenario (Blass 1998 page 3). This led Milgram to a question specific to the Holocaust;” Just how far would a person go under the experimenter's orders?” (Milgram 1977). This question became the basis for Milgram’s famous “shock experiments” . He was curious about what made these people commit lethal acts and what factors had influenced them in the process (Blass 1998 page 1). Although his question was specific to the Holocaust, his findings reveal general information and cannot be attributed to particular instances . He wanted to test how far people under the influence of an authority figure would go if they believed they were harming someone to the point of death (Slater 2004 page

In many situations, there have been authority figures with mass followings. Often the power the leader holds over their followers can influence them to do negative things. Many people believe that they can be independent enough to resist any pressure put on them by an authoritative figure. If this was true, then why do genocides mark the pages of history books around the world? Stanley Milgram sought to answer this budding question. He used his scientific authority to conduct an experiment which would reveal that most people would succumb to authority and obey their commands. This contradicts what most people would like to believe about themselves and their morals. Although many people believe that they would never harm another human being, even under pressure from an authoritative figure, the Stanley Milgram Experiment proves that this is false. Most people would collapse under the pressure and obey any command given to them.

Gary Taylor Psychology Essay On, The Milgram Experiment Stanley Milgram conducted the first of a series of very famous psychological experiments In 1961 that was created to gauge people’s level of obedience to an authority figure. What happens when you put a person’s conscience against the orders of an authority figure? In the words of Milgram, “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders?” His setup was fairly basic.

Milgram’s shocking obedience study tested the effects of authority on the obedience of the average person (Brannigan 2013). Milgram recruited 40 men via the newspaper; these men receive compensation of $4.50 for their participation (Brannigan 2013). Milgram asked Yale students to predict the outcome of this test; students stated that no more than 3 out of 100 would deliver the maximum XXX shock (Brannigan 2013). Each participant assumed the role of “the teacher” while a confederate of the experiment assumed the role of “the student”. The authority figure in this study is the experimenter; he will instruct the teacher throughout the testing process. The experimenter informs the participants that the shocks they will be delivering would range from 30 volts to 450 volts. The shocks are painful with the fatal potential. The experimenter instructs the teacher to deliver a shock each time the student makes a mistake. The voltages marked from a slight shock, medium shock, dangerous severe shock and the maximum level simply labeled XXX (Brannigan 2013). The students were to act as if they are hurting from the shock, screaming, begging and even claiming a heart condition for relief. When a teacher became reluctant to continue the experimenter would call them by name and give a standard prod designed to challenge the

The results and conclusion of Milgram’s experiment demonstrated an obedience to authority and “do as you are told” mentality. Many subjects showed signs of tension and were uncomfortable delivering the shocks, yet all 40 subjects obeyed up to 300 volts. Sixty three percent of the subjects continued give shocks until the maximum level of 450 volts was reached. Experts predicted that only one to three percent of the participants would continue to deliver shocks, and that these individuals would have to be psychopaths. However, footage of Milgram’s experiment shows 65% of the subjects continued giving shocks, and none stopped when the learner said he had heart trouble (1962). Milgram carried out eighteen variations of his study, altering the situation

Dr. Stanley Milgram, a 28-year-old graduate from Harvard in social psychology. Milgram conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram experiment was based on the killings in World War II of the Nazi’s by Germans. To perform this experiment Milgram ran ads in the newspaper, offering $4.00 for 1 hour of an individual time and an extra .50 for carfare if they participated. No high school students or college students were allowed to participate. No experience necessary and the age group range from the age of 20 years old to 50 years old. With this experiment, Milgram used some of his confederates as learners and participants as the teacher. Not knowingly,

A psychologist at Yale University, Stanley Milgram, carried out a study in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. The experiment was conducted shortly after the World War II, Nuremburg War Criminal trials, in which the accused had used the defense that they were merely following orders from their superiors. Milgram’s experiment was designed to answer the question: “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?”

Four switches are marked slight shock, moderate shock, strong shock, very strong shock, intense shock, extreme intensity shock, and danger: severe shock. The trick is the learner doesn’t receive any shocks after the experiment begins because he is acting. There are two experiments that are the same but with different people. The first experiment involves a woman with the last name Brandt. She gives the learner 210 volts and decides to stop. The second experiment is with a man named Prozi. Even though Prozi had the same test he continued to question the man in the electric chair until the experiment was discontinued.