2This article describes one of the best elements of contract called consideration and on what extent consideration is valid or not. Thousands of years ago people use barter system to exchange goods and services to meet their needs without any special law than invention of currency make it easy to exchange goods, eventually the law makes it valid and more reliable. There are six elements in which the parties are generally bound to do something in future such as Offer and Acceptance, consideration, intention, invitation to treat, Legal capacity. Consideration appeared in 1916 and become one of the basic and essential elements for the development of contract. Consideration is nothing but an enforceable agreement where a promissory promise to exchange or to do something in future and promisee accept to perform such act in return and the parties intend to bind through agreement. The question arises that whether the consideration is legally valid or not under some conditions. Consideration could be small or long, good or bad. Earlier nominal consideration was adequate in contract. It does not matter that the consideration having the same values or same benefit. The courts uses sufficient consideration while setting the disputes or making the decision. Where there is money, payment and exchange of goods is involved, consideration considered to be more valuable. Contracts are frequently exercise commercially such as construction, purchase and sale of property, monetary assistance,
A contract is formed when an offer by one party is accepted by the other party. Consideration is the price paid for the promise of the other party. The price must be something of value, although it need not be money. Consideration may be some right, interest or benefit going to one party or some, losses or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other party.
Furthermore, the agreement, is where the actual contract is offered and accepted by two parties (Cheeseman, 2010). The consideration is the legal form of payment or exchange within the contract such as money, property, or provision of services (Cheeseman,
Mutual assent and consideration go together so this paper will argue against them together. Mutual assent is the idea that all the parties in a contract know what they are contracting to and agree to it. As defined in Charles S. Knapp, Nathan M. Crystal, and Harry G. Prince’s Problems in
This is a legal term that is given to the bargained for exchange between the parties in which a contract is made. This can be something of some value that is passed from one party to the other. In addition each party of the contract will gain some benefit from the agreement as well as incur some obligation in exchange for the benefit received.
Under Common Law, for a contract to exist, three elements must be present: an offer, an acceptance and a consideration. The notions of offer and acceptance under Common Law are not fundamentally different from those in French contract law, although their effects may differ. The offer indicates the willingness of a party to enter into a bargain, and the acceptance reflects the agreement of the other party to the offer.
Lillard, Monique C., Fifty Jurisdictions in Search of a Standard: The Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in the Employment Context, 57 Mo. L. Rev. (1992)
13. No Other Consideration. Charter, Lamonea, and Oliva affirms that the only consideration received for entering into this Agreement is as stated herein, and that no other promise, representation or agreement of any kind has been made to, or relied upon by, all parties in connection with the execution of this Agreement. All parties further acknowledges that they have read the entire Agreement, has been fully advised of the legal effect of each provision contained in this Agreement by counsel of their own choosing, and fully understands the meaning and intent of the Agreement, including, but not limited to, mutually protecting all parties, and its final and binding effect in relation to the release of all claims.
The doctrine of consideration is one of the most established doctrines within the common law of contract. This essay will discuss the impact of Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1989] EWCA Civ 5 on the doctrine of consideration. It will shed light on the rules of consideration, ways to avoid consideration, application of the rules in the specific circumstance of performance of an existing duty in cases. Evidently an alteration to the rules and practices would be displayed. Courts today need to make a distinction between everyday social agreements and legally binding contracts, this is where the doctrine of consideration manifests. This case introduces the practical benefit rule needed for consideration however, this case did not alter set legislation formed from the case Stilk v Myric[1809]. As it was held in the Court of Appeal and not seen or upheld by the House of Lords.
other in order to form a contract, the value of the consideration need not be
The statement in this question is “Consideration is the concept of legal value in connection with contracts. It is anything of value promised to another when making a contract. However, “past consideration is not considered a good consideration”. Please illustrate your answer with reference to 3 articles and case laws.”
A Contract requires several elements in order to be considered enforceable. However for the purpose of this essay we would explore one of these elements in order to effectively understand the controversial cases of Williams v Roffey Brothers and Nicholls (contractors) Ltd (1990) and Stilk v Myrick (1804). Before going any further one should briefly understand the doctrine of Consideration. Despite the vast amount of content written, the doctrine of consideration is still to this day unclear due to the inconsistency of the courts and its application of necessary rules. Consideration refers to that which the law deems as valuable in that the promisor receives from the promise that which was promised. In other words, it is the exchange of something of value between the parties in a contract. One should be mindful that in English law, every promise may not be legally enforceable; it requires the court to distinguish between are enforceable and non-enforceable obligations. This brings us to the controversial cases of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v the Roffery brothers. Many argue that that the case of Williams was wrongly decided leading to impairments in the rule initially established in Stilk v Myrick. This essay seek to analyse and critique the cases of Stilk v Myrick and Williams v Roffey Brothers and also highlight whether or not the new rule of Practical benefit lead to serious impairments in later cases.
Contracts are used in many different forms and for just as many different situations within our everyday lives. Some contracts are more involved than others and for some; contracts are an essential of their success. As we continue, we will take a look at different types of contracts with the main focus on enforceable contracts. With so many elements that are incorporated into any contract, the six essential elements of enforceable contracts will be the main focus of this writing. Having a clearer understanding of the essentials of life will help prepare us for life’s curves that may come our way.
Introduction: In this assignment I will go over a few legal terms in relation to contract law. I will also talk about a few precedents that help explain the law.
A contract is a written or spoken agreement between two or more parties that involves the exchange of two promises, which is intended to be enforceable by law. The four basic elements are the offer, consideration, acceptance, and mutuality. When elements are broken down individually, each one is just as important as the next. If one of these elements are broken or misunderstood, it could mean result in the contractual agreement becoming not valid and end in lawsuit. The overall purpose of the contract is for legal purpose and to keep a order within an agreement.
Quantitative Applications in Management & Research ASSIGNMENT PROGRAM: SEMESTER-I Subject Name : Quantitative Applications in Management & Research Permanent Enrollment Number (PEN) : Roll Number (SEN) : Student Name : INSTRUCTIONS a) Students are required to submit all three assignment sets. ASSIGNMENT Assignment A Assignment B Assignment C b) c) d) e) DETAILS Five Subjective Questions Three Subjective Questions + Case Study 40