preview

The Keystone Xl And Dakota Access Pipeline

Decent Essays
Open Document

Now in first few weeks of the new administration, President Trump has been acting fast to keep his promises. Some of the first actions he took were to fulfill his promises concerning jobs and the economy. Before Trump was inaugurated he was given credit for keeping some jobs, from Carrier, from going to Mexico and some have said that was Trump proving that he could keep his promise to bring back jobs. His critics said that these particular jobs were never going to leave in the first place, and that these ‘kept’ jobs ought to be attributed to Obama’s administration not the then President Elect Trump. Some of the first place and that Trump signed after he was inaugurated were concerned with the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines …show more content…

He drafted and signed an executive order that begins the construction for the border wall ("Executive Order…”). This action sparked discontent between Trump and the Mexican president since Mexico has no plans to pay for a border wall that they do not want. For the payment of the wall Trump has said that he will place a tax on Mexican imports the problem with this is that it puts the burden of paying for the wall on US consumers and businesses as this tax will rise prices for Mexican products and materials. Seeing as Mexico is one of the US’s largest trading partners it could very well have an effect one everyone in the US. Another executive order that is “in the works” called for 10,000 border patrol officers to be hired to increase the security along the border, just as Trump promised (Valverde). The first controversial order of these particular executive orders is the one that requires sanctuary cities to hand over illegal immigrants or risk losing federal grant money ("What Trump Has…”). In opposition to sanctuary cities John Culberson, a Republican from Texas, pointed out that federal law requires local and state officials to share immigration information with federal authorities ("Showdown Looms…”). However, Peter Markowitz stated in a CNN article that the constitution prevents that federal government from “conditioning funding in order to coerce local agencies into federal service” ("Sanctuary Cities…”). Both

Get Access