Kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. The "Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children" is a semi- structured interview which combines dimensional and categorical approaches to diagnose current and past episodes of psychopathology in children and adolescents. It is used for the assessment of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents (age 6 to 18 years). Originally an extension of the Adults SADS, it was first developed by Puig-Antich. Since then, it has been repeatedly updated to match with the DSM criteria (Ghanizada, Mohammadi & Yazdanshenas, 2006). Presently, it has several variants which include KSADS -P (Present), -E (Episodic), -PL (Present and Lifetime) among others;
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of DSM-IV TR, as well as new changes for DSM-V.
The realiability was not tested extensively, with only 26 people being re-tested. However, the coefficient was still high as it should have been. This is offset by the fact that the test cannot be given that much later, as the patients progress and treatment would have to be taken into account over a longer period of time. This test measures depression well and is used often to measure the depressive levels of symptoms. It is a quick and efficient way to measure depression.
CM spoke to Gardan Speights (Psychiatric Social Worker - Bergen Regional Medical Center) regarding a follow-up on Sinai (youth). CM was informed Bergen Regional will release youth tomorrow at 11:00am back to Mr. Maccagno (caregiver). Ms. Speights noted youth wants to be placed on medication in order to cope with caregiver. The team is not in agreement with medication for youth. Ms. Speights contacted Maria (CST) to discuss school placement for youth; CST will follow-up with the Jersey City Medical Center Partial Hospitalization program to rescheduled intake appointment.
DAS is recommended for this group as it is reliable and gives correct prediction and outcomes regarding depression. This assessment tool is easy to use; it is a self-report scale consisting of 40 items with each item having a statement and 7-point Likert scale. The questions used in this assessment are direct and easy making it efficient for most individuals' use (de Graaf, Roelofs, & Huibers, 2009). Besides,
To understand of fundamentals of this assessment, it is important to understand the disorder itself and its effects on individuals, particularly children and
It’s estimated that the onset of 50% of chronic mental illnesses occurs by the age of fourteen, and about 75% by the age of 24 (NAMI, 2015). The most common mental health diagnoses in the United States are mood disorders, which include the spectrums of anxiety disorders, depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Unfortunately, 60% of adults and 50% of youth did not receive medical services for their mental health conditions in the previous fiscal year (NAMI, 2015).
A work-up must include a thorough interview of patient with assessment of positive and negative symptoms. There are many rare medical causes that present as psychosis in children (Benjamin et al., 2013). Genetic syndromes, IEM, and autoimmune, neurological, endocrinological and nutritional disorders that can present with psychotic symptoms must also be considered (Giannitelli, 2017). Assessment must include thorough physical examination, lab studies including complete blood count, serum electrolytes and glucose, hepatic and renal function, thyroid stimulating hormone, syphilis test, prolactin levels, hepatitis C, vitamin B12 and folate, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and antinuclear antibodies are recommended. Urinalysis, urine and serum toxicology, and human immunodeficiency virus testing should be done if there are risk factors present (). (Find sep. citation)
For this assignment , I viewed the timelines of the following students Monsenya Chatman, Miranda Stanton, Alexis Jackson and my own timeline. The similarities between the time lines are: they were colorful, individuals and events that had the biggest impact on early childhood programs were included and pictures of the individuals or events were included, all timelines included information about the individuals John Cornelius and Friedrich Froebel. The differences between the timelines are: Monsenya included John Dewey, Miranda included Montessori, Alexis included information on the founding of NAEYC and Child Care Development Grant and I included information about Jean Jacques Rousseau and Johann Pestalozzi. John Cornelius, Friedrich Froebel,
There have been other assessment tools developed to help with screening and diagnosing pediatric mania, but they are not made to help diagnose pediatric BPD. One of the tools is the
The goal from last week was reached, all the steps and attending to the nutritionist presentation were completed and the information from the nutritionist was great. One of my biggest challenges is the crazy schedules that my wife and I have, it is always something that we have to do after we get home from work, the kids always have after school activities and takes a lot of time and resources to make it to all their activities. This week goal is to create a family calendar using an app where we all can view each other schedule and we can enter appointments, after school activities remotely and from different devices. I think this will help with the crazy schedules.
The inclusion of ages and genders is essential when properly assessing childhood psychopathology, and in addition including the perspective of various sources is also crucial. The DSM does not account for the various perspectives of a child’s behavior and therefore a complete picture of the behaviors has not been attained. Parents, teachers and the child themselves will all have varying accounts of the behavior in question. Every perspective must be weighed to determine the true extent of a child’s psychopathology. Various individuals will have differing opinions on the nature and extent of a child’s behaviors causing the inclusion of all perspectives when assessing a child to be vital (Hudziak, Althoff, & Pine, 2007).
• Children this age show erratic, inconsistent behaviours: one moment they are happy, the next, weeping. In one instant they are affectionate and loving, the next, they resent their parents. At once they feel invincible, the next,
Notwithstanding that, other appraisal tool can be utilized to assess the care of K and it recuperation handle. For instance, the Beck depression inventory (BDI,) (Beck et al, 1961) is as often as possible utilized for measuring depression however as indicated by NICE Guidance (2005) it is not proper for young people as the reading level and reaction configuration may not be appropriate for them. NICE prescribe The Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) (Angold et al, 1995) which has great demonstrative and predictive validity for young people. The Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS) planned by Reynolds (1987), has been recorded reliability and validity. These evaluations must be repeated at consistent interims of one to four weeks for the data to be precise, (NICE, 2005).
Promising developments in the treatment of mood disorders in adults have played a role. In addition the application of diagnostic criteria in children has greatly improved.
In 2008, a study was conducted that sampled 673 children and adolescents to ensure that the revised DSM-oriented scale was reliable (Ebesutani et al., 2010). The results from this study yielded a range of reliability coefficients of 0.71 to 0.89 depending on the diagnostic category items being test (Ebesutani et al., 2010). Although, slightly lower than the originally calculated reliability, it still suggests that the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 6 to 18 is a reliable diagnostic tool. Furthermore, regarding test-retest reliability, a study was conducted in 1979 that sampled 13 boys between the ages of 12 and 18 as well as 16 girls age 6 to 11 and 8 girls age 12 to 16 (Achenbrach & Edelbrock, 2008). They were tested twice within a interval time frame of 7.3 days (Achenbrach & Edelbrock, 2008). The Pearson rs for the boys was 0.82, which is both close to the original rs calculated as well as indicative of high test-retest reliability.This was further reinforced by the group of girls age 6 to 11 with an rs of 0.88 and the group of girls age 12 to 16 with an rs of 0.90 (Achenbrach & Edelbrock,