The Knowledge Of The Natural Sciences And History Based On Assumptions And Is It Possible? Essay

1297 WordsJun 16, 20156 Pages
When the quote states, “attempt to know the world”, it is regarding the gain of knowledge. This is because knowledge is the understanding of the physical world surrounding us and beyond. Plato defined knowledge as ‘justified, true belief, meaning that for knowledge to be legitimate, it must be justified by sources such as reason, empirical evidence or memory. Secondly, the term ‘assumptions’ in the quote should also be explored. According to the oxford dictionary, assumptions can be defined as something ‘that is accepted as true without proof’ . Therefore the quote is stating that our knowledge of the world is based on a set of assumptions. The second part of the assertion produces the knowledge issues of the inability of testing the knowledge. The oxford dictionary defines ‘tested’ as taking measurements to check the reliability of the something. Therefore, a key question that comes from this quote is: To what extent are all knowledge in the natural sciences and history based on assumptions and is it possible to test it’s reliability? The first knowledge issue from this quote is that the knowledge gained from the physical world is based on things that without proof. This knowledge issue can be interlinked with the area of knowledge of natural sciences. The natural sciences study the rules that govern the natural world by applying an empirical and scientific method to study of the universe. It is considered on of the more objective area of knowledge due to the scientific
Open Document