The Last Wilderness Survival Rhetorical Analysis

Rhetorical Analysis of Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle The Jungle, being a persuasive novel in nature, is filled with different rhetorical devices or tools used by Sinclair to effectively convey his message. Sinclair’s goal of encouraging change in America’s economic structure is not an easy feat and Sinclair uses a number of different rhetorical devices to aid him. Through his intense tone, use of periodic sentencing, descriptive diction and other tools of rhetoric, Upton Sinclair constructs a moving novel that makes his message, and the reasoning behind it, clear.Sinclair’s use of periodic sentences allows him to cram details and supporting evidence into his sentence before revealing his interpretation of the evidence. Take for example, “Here

Upton Sinclair’s novel The Jungle had powerful political effects, resulting in his ultimate goal to create change. He was aware about the unsanitary conditions in the meat factories and therefore knew that something needed to be done. He was determined to implant a spark in readers and make them desire change. The variety of the rhetorical devices that Sinclair included helped him accomplish his goal. In chapter 14 from The Jungle, Upton Sinclair identifies imagery, personification, and pathos in order to inspire change upon the unhealthy standards and brutal work conditions in the factories.

“Who would pretend that a history of a migration has immunized the United States against bigotry?” In Staying Put: Making a Home in a Restless World, Scott Russel Sanders uses this rhetorical question to convince his readers to think more logistically about migration. He pries open the eyes of Americans and shows them the damage that moving can cause, as opposed to Salaman Rushdie’s thoughts that it was only positive.

Many people wish they can drop everything important to them and isolate themselves from society; very few people will even attempt this, but Chris McCandless breaks societal norms to accomplish this goal. In Into the Wild, John Krakauer tells the story of this young man’s life to inspire the audience to chase their dreams through the use of logos, involved sentence, and anecdotes.

A prosecutor’s job is to find evidence to support his case against an individual accused of breaking the law while a defense attorney tries to present evidence to prove the innocence of the person accused. Neither can be truly be unbiased about their evidence but each of them is motivated to confirm a particular position. Much like a defense attorney, in his biography, Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer attempts to prove that McCandless’s tragedy was not due to his incompetence or lack of knowledge about the wild. He asserts emotions and rational onto McCandless’s experience as well as drawing similarities between his personal experience and McCandless’s in order to create a more sympathetic response from readers.

Ex. 1: In the third chapter of the novel, where Krakauer describes McCandless’s relationship with Wayne Westerberg, he discusses Chris McCandless’s family and education in brief. Specifically, Krakauer mentions, “In May 1990, Chris graduated from Emory University in Atlanta, … and had distinguished himself as a history and anthropology major with a 3.72 grade-point average” (Krakauer 20). This presents a side of Chris that appeals to people’s logos and makes them think. The main question that pops into mind is, “how could such a smart kid make such a dumb mistake?” This intrigue keeps the reader immersed in the book,

In her essay “Living Like Weasels”, Annie Dillard explores the idea of following a single calling in life, and attaching one’s self it this calling as the weasel on Ernest Thompson Seton’s eagle had. Dillard presents her argument using the analogy of a weasel and how the; “weasel lives as he’s meant to, yielding at every moment to the perfect freedom of single necessity” (Dillard). In constructing her argument, however, she often contradicts herself undermining the effectiveness of her argument and leaving the reader confused. Dillard primarily uses ethos and pathos to support her argument and concerning both, the reader discovers; inconsistencies in her character, and conflicts between her perceptions of the weasel’s emotions and its actions. Concerning her ethos, Dillard presents herself as a part of suburbia and then is suddenly, inexplicably overcome by the desire to live wild. Dillard also uses very detailed language throughout the essay in describing her surroundings and thoughts, however; this further undermines her argument and ethos as she is trying to convince the reader that she could simply become as simple and single minded as the weasel she has focused her argument around. With her use of pathos, Dillard begins her essay with descriptions of the weasel’s brutality, yet; she concludes by stating the weasel lives as is necessary. By simplifying her experience and presenting a reasonable explanation for why she wanted to

Rhetorical devices are used to strengthen writing and add dimension. When used properly, they add layers of complexity to any prose as well as further evidence for an argument. No one understood this better than Upton Sinclair. Four strong rhetoric devices are periodicity, the Rule of Three, metaphor and rhetorical questions. Sinclair masterfully demonstrates these in a speech featured in his novel, The Jungle.

Happiness is a person who experience positive emotions, share and received love, someone who is always laughs and has a smile on his face. Not all the people has the pleasure of having those feelings. Can be hard in life finding happiness when people around, are not happy either in life. In the book “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer deals about Chris McCandless who had a long life to live but, dies in the wild pursuing his happiness. Christopher Johnson McCandless come from a wealthy family and a brilliant man with perfect grades. He had everything in life, but he was not happy at all so, he decides to leave everything behind and start on a journey. Even though he did not went into the right path to reach his happiness, at the end he died for consuming the wrong seeds to survive in the wild. Jon Krakauer identify a lot with Chris McCandless’s life that he decided to write a book about Chris’s life. Joh Krakauer applies into the book the rhetorical situation and rhetorical appeals.

The Last Wilderness Preserve and A New Land of Opportunity present different arguments about the impact of human action on Antarctica, and lead to different conclusions about how to treat it. Kendra Washington, author of The Last Wilderness Preserve, believes that human interference in Antarctica can cause and worsen many environmental issues. She claims that the continent was able to maintain its natural state due to the limited amount of human interaction, and should be left alone. On the other hand, Michael Serillo, author of The New Land of Opportunity, believes that human action in Antarctica would bring about many scientific advancements, and can even help protect it. He claims that the beauty and resources that can be found in Antarctica are reason enough to take as much advantage of the land as possible. Kendra Washington’s argument is more effective, as she takes the environmental and social consequences into greater

Jimmy Carter uses many techniques to persuade the reader that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. He uses specific word choices to catch the reader's attention. He uses evidence to show how his his argument is valid. Carter also uses emotional attachment to get the reader to become attached to this article.

In an attempt to preserve the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, former president Jimmy Carter hopes to encourage the American people to share his desire to protect the refuge . Carter planned to persuade the people by using mechanisms such as imagery, diction, and the appeal to the people's emotions.By doing so, his tone is defensive, and concerned, which provides the readers with how he truly feels about abusing the refuge for industrial purposes only.

Jimmy Carter, the 39th president of the United States, makes a compelling argument in his article, “Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.” He uses his own passion and stylistic abilities to persuade readers to consider the wilderness and the environment around us an essential, precious part of our world. To get his point across, he uses his personal anecdotes to convey passion and ardor to the readers, good vocabulary and word choice to evoke images and emotions, and strong directives with the pronoun “we” to put himself on the same level as his readers so it’s easier to relate to him. Using those 3 rhetorical devices, Carter is able to successfully convince his readers that this wildlife refuge is a crucial region to take prudent action with. One of the most prevalent rhetorical strategies seen in Carter’s article is personal anecdotes. In this article specifically, he includes an abundance of his personal experiences to kindle the minds of his readers. In fact, an entire paragraph is dedicated to narrating his time at the coastal plain in the Arctic. “One of the most unforgettable and humbling experiences of our lives occurred on the coastal plain. We had hoped to see caribou during our trip, but to our amazement, we witnessed the migration of tens of thousands of caribou with their newborn calves.” Explaining a moment in his own life gives the reader a chance to imagine what it was like to see such a beautiful sight. Though the audience may not have visited this place, his explanation evokes images and personal feelings in the reader’s mind. Relating personal experiences to his audience is one of the most effective ways to persuade and inform the readers. In summary, Carter successfully used personal anecdotes in his article; furthermore, inviting the audience to take a look into the most unforgettable moment of Carter’s life. In turn, this brings emotions toward wildlife into the reader’s mind. Another effective strategy that Carter uses in the article is good choice of vocabulary. Good word choice evokes more powerful images than it would with average vocabulary. To explain further, Carter appeals to good word choice in a specific paragraph in his article. “During bright July days, we walked along ancient

The author of “The Last Wilderness Preserve” gives a statement as to why humans are harmful to Antarctica, yet does not effectively provide supporting details to back this statement up; This can be found when the passage states, “...even small teams of scientists can bring harm to this otherwise untouched land. Some scientific pursuits may invite greed, exploitation, and even conflict to Antarctica.” The passage goes on to keep stating this fact without providing reasoning to support it, causing a weak argument. However, the passage “A New Land of Opportunity” provides strong supporting details to backup the argument presented. The claim stated is “...people must take the opportunity to explore and learn about this mysterious land.”

Firstly, To identify the way in which high-latitude areas are as much a part of the geographical imagination of place as they are actual locations, perhaps, global warming lead to open routes to these areas. For visitors form most of the world, it is this imagined place with its associated images and history that acts as a major drive for the desire to travel to the far north and south. Yet, at the same time, it must be remembered that, especially Antarctica, we are dealing with the places where there no native’s population to guide and sense of understanding the place will be difficult not only for tourists but also for researchers and expeditors. Such areas are likely to reflect lots of inconvenient factors while