The Laws Of An Established Legal System

Imagine you are the director of health information services for a medium-sized health care facility. Like many of your peers, you have contracted with an outside copying service to handle all requests for release of patient health information at your facility. You have learned that a lobbying organization for trial attorneys in your state is promoting legislation to place a cap on photocopying costs, which is significantly below the actual costs incurred as part of the contract. (Case Study, p. 20)

To be sure, modern laws are made to express the general will, a will that aims at the common good. This means that laws in most cases intend to protect every social member’s rights under the principle of justice and fairness. For telling examples one need to look no further than American judicial system. The access to the two courts systems, one federal court and one state court, provides citizens with the greatest potential to have their legal problems

Our modern day society in the United State of America is considered to be a “land of laws, not men…” This means that in order for everyone to live happily and have freedoms, there must be strict rules and regulations to guide us in our daily actions. Along with these, a government is constituted to form the laws for the people. As mentioned before, the society in Night and our modern one both have a

Criminal law is a construct of the government, enforced through tangible measures. In a democratic society, the government is elected by the citizens, and as such, laws are generally conceived with the aim to reflect whatever ethical or moral standards are presently acceptable. However, in order to be truly effective, some legislation must circumvent current sociological viewpoints in order to create laws that are genuinely in the best interests of society. This results in a delicate balancing act, as lawmakers attempt to weigh the views of the majority against the need for laws to be both reasoned and objective.

In the United States, we have laws that require punishment for people that conduct themselves in a negative social behavior. Understanding how our court systems utilize this legislation to ensure that negative social behavior can be corrected. When looking at how these laws are placed into use in our criminal justice systems, one must understand the difference between the court terminology of law on the books and law in action (Neubauer and Fradella, 2009).

In the United States of America, there is a system referred to as the criminal justice system. This system assists in managing crime and helps to control society through rules and regulations. If these guidelines are disobeyed, there are consequences that follow. These consequences consist of being arrested by law enforcement, going to court to pay a fine or to be sentenced, and even going to jail or prison (Bohm & Haley, 2014).

In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.

     In his book on ?The Behavior of Law? Donald Black attempts to describe and explain the conduct of law as a social phenomenon. His theory of law does not consider the purpose, value, impact of law, neither proposes any kind of solutions, guidance or judgment; it plainly ponders on the behavior of law. The author grounds his theory purely on sociology and excludes the psychology of the individual from his assumptions on the behavior of law (Black 7). The theory of law comes to the same outcome as other theories scrutinizing the legal environment, such as deprivation theory or criminal theory; however, the former concentrates on the patterns of behavior of law, not involving the

Minor laws are the ones that are breaking up social order in our region. The author explains that “more and more ordinary citizens are becoming scofflaws” (Frank

The process of law setting, implementation, monitoring and regulation is a responsibility of a body called the justice system. Additionally, crime control and prevention are also among its fundamental duties. It is established in every country of the world and functions with an objective of ensuring the noble conduct of the people. It also intends to serve as a decision-making body when people violate the rules by penalizing them. It is to make them responsible citizens and to ensure that the society remains a hospitable and safe place for other people to survive (Cole, Smith & DeJong, 2015).

Prisons are correctional facilities where offenders are incarcerated as punishment and deterrent from engaging in other criminal activities. It serves justice for victims of criminal offenses and provides a chance for the offender to reflect, and with prison time; they will become better citizens of society. This however, may not always be the case. If an inmate exhibits understanding of good behavior and structure, a prisoner may not serve his or her full sentence in prison. They may be released on Home Detention Curfew (tagging) or granted parole. Some offenders get up to half of their sentence time removed. In both situations, the inmate is expected to benefit from integration in the community and leading a positive lifestyle. According to the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (1), there are laid down laws who is legible and who is illegible to early release from prison. The Department of corrections can allow early release of an offender if they exhibit commendable behavior and take part in other recommended programs for disciplinary treatment, while in prison. There are individuals who agree and disagree for the idea of early release from prison. Individuals of both sides have specific reasons for their position on the effects of early prison release. Giving inmates a chance to portray positive and beneficial behavior, allows them to gain responsibility and incentive, in order to strive for success. In contrary, according to Christine

Social control theory has become one of the more widely accepted explanations in the field of criminology in its attempt to account for rates in crime and deviant behavior. Unlike theories that seek to explain why people engage in deviant behavior, social control theories approach deviancy from a different direction, questioning why people refrain from violating established norms, rules, and moralities. The theory seeks to explain how the normative systems of rules and obligations in a given society serve to maintain a strong sense of social cohesion, order and conformity to widely accepted and established norms. Central to this theory is a perspective which predicts that deviant behavior is much more likely to emerge when

Imagine what it would be like to live in a world without any laws or authority figures? For some people that projects an image of relief and bliss due to the fact that they can literally do what they please. However, on the other side of the spectrum, some people will imagine a corrupt and destroyed world. I am one of those people that believe laws and rules are necessary in society, even if it requires a limitation on our civil freedoms. Throughout the paper I will discuss why as a nation of laws we must rely on law enforcement agencies to enforce our laws through the use of “political correctness”, even if it restricts society.

A collection of rules authorised by a political body and enforced by those with authoritative power (Open Education Sociology Dictionary, 2017), law is a prevalent part of every society, no matter its size. In this essay I will explain the difference between sociological perspectives and common sense, offer a brief introduction into the two perspectives I have chosen to write about, and analyse and compare their views on the structure of law. Also, I intend to find out if the relevancy the perspectives held at the time of writing translates into today’s society.

The statement above said by Lord Bingham, from ‘The Rule of Law’ (2007) 66 (1) Cambridge Law Journal 67-85, p. 76. The statement references that the rule of law is not abided by if the state does not provide human protection. This statement can be looked upon, agreed and disagreed with after reviewing the two theories in the rule of law. This will be made possible, as I compare Joseph Raz’s formal theory and Lord Bingham’s Substantive Theory on the rule of law. But firstly, I will address what the Rule of Law is;