The Leadership Style Of Authoritarian Leadership In Basketball

The first leadership style is "Autocratic" in which the leaders understand the strength of the authority and sees subordinates as important parts of a big machine. These leaders do not believe in opinion or suggestions.

This is an investigation of different coaching methods and styles of leadership in which are most effective and preferred by Athletes. The various leadership styles are explained and examined. The present study found that there isn't one style that is most effective or preferred by all athletes specifically.

Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. It can also be derived

Authoritarian leadership style is where a leader has complete control and power over their team. They demonstrate their 'power' and 'control' by dictating policies and procedures, deciding what goals need to be achieved, and directs all activities to be done by the team. An authoritarian is usually most successful when things are going well or when in a crisis and decisions need to be made quickly.

An example of leadership is in basketball setting an example for your other team members to follow even when it gets tough.A leader puts other people before himself and helps keep the team in order. The leader always gives 110% even when he wants to quit because he knows if he does the whole team will fall apart. I was a leader when my team was losing in a game at halftime and we went into the locker room i knew we needed an extra push so i decided to motivate the team. After halftime I gave an extra effort in bringing us back into the game by doing good on both defense and offense. Another example in which i have resolved a dispute is at basketball practice. It started as a regular practice with stretching and a little jogging. We started

Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization. I chose LeBron James as a leader, because he is considered to be one of the greatest basketball players ever and he is considered one of the best leaders in basketball history. First, He shows leadership skills when it comes to his team on and off the basketball court. Second, he shows leadership skills in the community for the kids. Third, his leadership skills allow him to acknowledge when there is failure and change is needed. In the following paragraphs I will outline LeBron’s leadership skills.

Being place at CCP for approximately three weeks I observed the leadership style to be a more authoritarian leadership. Authoritarian leadership is a “leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Authoritarian leaders typically make choices based on their ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group”. (Autocratic Leadership: Characteristics, Pros, Cons. (n.d.). During weekly meeting the program manager discuss day to day operations, regulations, new procedure /mandated requirement, practice etc. During these meeting employees often mumble below their breath

Autocratic leadership, is a style which is characterized by the individual control over all the decisions and little input from group members. These type of leaders rarely accept advice from followers. These type of leaders tend to be bossy and controlling. Failing to consult with other team members in such situations hurts the overall success of the group.

Authoritarianism is a political system in which a leader or a small elite group contains all real power. Individual liberties such as freedom of speech, press, and religion are subordinate to the authority of which citizens are blindly compliant to, as opposed to enjoying at will. Therefore, the people's main role in the government is to execute rather than engage. Authoritarianism is described as being a strong central government, which is essentially the exact opposite of democracy.

Often times an authoritarian leader has full control of those around them, and believes to have complete authority to treat them as they want. An authoritarian leader would provide instructions without looking for inputs and superintend his or her nurses in a close manner. However, problems may arise if a nurse must wait for the manager's decision or direction before taking action regarding a patient. Although the authoritarian leadership style can be viewed as undesirable, it has proved to be very efficient in emergent and stressful situations. One of the key benefits of authoritarian leadership is the fact that decision making becomes much more simple and fast, as the leader doesn't have to consult or convince anybody. Basically authoritarian leadership can work wonders for the organization when decision making has to be quick and during some crisis.

When using an authoritarian leadership style, close adherence to regulations and policies are the fundamentals of this leadership style. Workers are held to a specific standard, and the relationship is purely professional. In a democratic leadership style, the decision-making ability is shared. The superintendent relies on feedback from the foremen when making decisions.

A team leader is someone who provides guidance, instruction, direction and leadership to a team for the purpose of achieving a key result. The Authoritarian Leadership style is a direct style where there is one team leader who orders what the team has to do; these team

The author has worked with the administrator for a while, and it is the opinion of the author that her leadership style is authoritarian. The administrator provides her expectations to the staff on what should be done, when it should be completed and how it should be accomplished. The administrator makes decisions without input from the staff. The administrator maintains her authority by force. Intimidation, threats, reward, and punishment, or her position.

There are two definite strengths of authoritarian leadership: efficiency and productiveness. These both impact the team positively, as team members will feel satisfied - having completed a task/accomplished a goal successfully. Generally, the more efficient and productive a team, the more likely they are to be successful. Authoritarian leaders are proficient at motivating others. This leadership style allows for fast decisions which can be a lengthy process in other leadership styles such as bureaucratic. This essentially allows the team to begin a project and complete it promptly. An example of where this leadership is most effective is in the Armed forces. There is a clear defined structure of ranks and roles within the regiment. There is one leader in charge (the general) who instructs lower ranks and gives orders. The sergeant does this without any input from lower ranks. Northouse (2012) states some “would argue that authoritarian leadership is a much-needed form of leadership– it serves a positive purpose, particularly for people who seek security above responsibility.” This supports the strengths of the authoritarian leadership

His behavior resulted in his creating shallow relationships with his executive peers, strong handing negotiations, and appearing arrogant. Had Jeff Shanley had a more guided approach to his leadership style, he may have been able to curtail the behavior and give Nick more of a purpose. As stands, the character of Nick himself held authoritarian leadership traits influenced by poor interpersonal relationships with his followers. This is expressed by Nick himself as he explains is has been a problem for him since college, “I can be sarcastic and rude at times, and sometimes I come across sounding like I think I’m smarter than everyone else” (Lencioni, 2007.) Despite this, his behavior alone is not enough to classify him as an authoritarian