The Leadership Styles On Display

The book Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action, written by Simone Sinek, is a necessary read for anyone wanting to take a deeper look at their leadership style. Simon Sinek is an author and motivational speaker with one simple goal, inspire others. Simon Sinek examines numerous companies throughout the book, and how they have been more successful in their business ventures, than others by merely starting with “why”. The “why” as illustrated throughout the book is the most powerful tool a leader has, but is often forgotten, or even worse, never realized. Likewise, it is paramount for the leaders in our Army to have the ability to think outside of the box, be innovated, and adaptable. There is a myriad of

There are several factors that will influence the choice of leadership styles and behaviours in workplace situations, some of the factors may develop

Leadership goes beyond management, for some, leadership is instinctual and pours over into your personal life. This paper will discuss a leader I admire in my personal life, and analyze their leadership style. I will discuss how that leader has influenced my leadership style, as well as how things like environment and the economy affect my leadership approach.

There are more than enough data about employee-boss relationships. Findings from Davis and Landa (1999) clearly indicate that workers don’t trust their managers. As much as 64 percent of workers surveyed believe that their managers deliberately mislead them. As Danbom (2007) reports, surveys even tell that business doesn’t trust business! No wonder there are distrust among employees.

When developing a template to assess which leadership styles are best suited to mitigate the effects of a decline in financial compensation, it is imperative to understand leadership theory. One of the first pioneers in leadership theory was Kurt Lewin. Kurt Lewin (1890–1947), was a prominent figure in psychology in his generation. He provided a solid foundation to the teachings of organizational development. In many circles he was known as the father of organizational development. He was best known for the development of field theory. Field theory was essential because it allowed business professionals to understand why undesirable behaviors was produced. It also taught how to bring about desirable behaviors. Field theory was developed in part because Lewin wanted to address organizational employee turnover.

A leader I admire, whether real-life or fictional character from the television, the movies or a book, will be identified. Leadership theories will be used to evaluate my selected leader to determine what characteristics and leadership abilities helped this leader become successful. I will also include an evaluation of my own leadership style and identify what my individual leadership characteristics are. The plan will be developed to improve my leadership style based upon the findings of my chosen leader’s leadership style compared to my own.

Strong leadership is vital to the success of any business, institution, school, team, or even church. Leaders that are considered effective encompass a leadership style and qualities that work to influence and motivate their followers. Joel Osteen, an evangelical pastor from Houston, Texas is truly one of the 21st centuries most captivating leaders. So much so, that he as selected by Barbara Walters as one of her 10 Most Fascinating People of 2016 (ABC News, 2006). His appeal is a phenomenon that is unmatched by any other current leaders in his profession. Over the past 15 years he has built a church, where he ministers one of the largest and most diverse congregations in America (Romano, 2005). Aside from his 45,000 attendees at his weekly services, his sermon is broadcasted in every television market in the United States and in over 100 other nations around the world (“About Joel,” n.d.). Joel Osteen is a prime example of a compelling leader who practices an effective leadership style that resonates with people on a personal level.

From the supplementary reading that Professor Belasen suggested, “Leadership Styles: Feared or Loved?” it is evident that the disadvantages of utilizing fear in the workplace greatly outweigh the advantages. One of the advantages of leaders instilling fear in their employees is gaining a level of respect. However, it seems as though such a level of respect will dissipate once the fear does as it is not built upon a foundation of mutual respect. Additionally, leaders who employ fear tactics prevent their employees from pursuing innovative thinking and instead deter them from taking initiative. In an atmosphere of fear, the primary concern is how to avoid mistakes instead of making bold plans that inevitably carry risks. Consequently, simultaneously

In reflecting on my one specific leadership style is difficult because my leadership style sometimes changes depending upon the particular employee I am leading, the situations I am faced with and what I am trying to accomplish. Being the second in command of a small police agency with only twenty-two sworn officers, as well as six non-sworn employees, they all have small differences from one another. These employee differences vary widely from generational, skill sets, needs, wants and personal motivations. One particular leadership style may work well with one employee I am trying to get to complete a specific task while that leadership style may cause another employee to resist or shut down. I believe one of the true characteristics of a strong leader is the ability to recognize and appreciate the differences between my subordinates and then lead them based upon the style that they will best respond to in order to succeed.

Leadership is a concept most people feel informed enough to discuss, but that few are truly educated sufficiently to comment on. Therefore, it is instructive to consider the leadership styles of people with very different approaches both to better understand the diversity underlying leadership, as well as to appreciate the effective and less effective strategies that underlie different leadership outcomes. For that reason, this essay will consider the styles of two leaders who are less visible in this highly contentious presidential election season: Jill Stein (the Green Party nominee) and Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. The leadership styles of both are very different, yet they are aligned in the sense that both are outsider candidates struggling to gain momentum from a disaffected electorate. This essay begins with a theoretical discussion of leadership more generally and then turns to the two leaders as case studies, comparing and contrasting them and drawing conclusions about how they both work within the same public sphere and for putatively similar ends (i.e., gaining votes).

The course itself is an eye opening on what to expect to complete the graduate program successfully. And integrating Christian point of view into how as, Christians, should live, helps in understanding the role we take. In addition to continue to provide leadership in a biblical perspective, ones must incorporate communication, time management, understand the difference in secular condition, leadership styles, barriers, to developing effective team and retrieve guidance through the word. This portfolio will display the development an individual must take to lead.

This paper is a critique of preceptor leadership methods. I will describe my current preceptor’s leadership style, giving an example of an observed valuable leadership strategy and why I found it to be successful. Shadowed by an example of an observed unsuccessful leadership strategy, how I responded, and a recommended strategy for the situation described. Ending with the type of leader I aspire to be in the future and my final thought regarding leadership.

I 'd just like to start off by saying that charisma isn 't always a positive thing. Some charismatic leaders do some pretty awful things. Take Jim Jones, for example - a leader of a troubled cult called the "People 's Temple". He used his charisma to brainwash them (really, there isn 't a better word. He quite literally brainwashed them, playing his voice continually over a loudspeaker that was broadcasted around the entire town.) He leads them to believe that the government was out to get them, that the government would never accept a segregation like this one. He made them believe that the government would come and kill them eventually, that they 'd torture their children and

My parents divorced when I was 11 and my mother left for Europe to be with her family. She definitely moved to USA when I was 16. I was really close to her while growing up so after she left I did not really have a female figure to look up too or to share my worries with. I grew up in the city and I was going to a private school; being the kid without a mother at home made me feel different but that was not something you could talk about in my dad’s house. He is a proud man and he put that pride in us so we had to keep our heads up all the time. Still, I had people talking on my back. I started keeping to myself from there and doing everything on my own without asking anyone help because that is how my dad wanted us to be: educated, successful, proud and independent so we wouldn’t have to deal with failure or rejection. I realize today that as people, we will always need someone’s help at some point in our life, and pride is not everything. It is hard letting go of old habits, but I am trying to be more of a people person because we can also learn from failure and rejection. They are all part of life.

People have always asked if there is any style of leadership that is most effective. Nevertheless, numerous theories and models have been created to show that there is no style of leadership that is the best. Rather, styles of leadership need to adjust depending on the variables such as the leader, the situation, the subordinate, the task, the environment and other factors. Paul Hersey, Kenneth H. Blanchard, and Dewey E. Johnson noted that if the leader’s style of behavior is appropriate or matches the situation it is considered effective. If it is not appropriate to a given situation, it is deemed ineffective. The difference between the effective and ineffective styles is often not the actual behavior of the leader, but the appropriateness of that behavior to the environment in which it is used. In reality, the third dimension is the environment.