The Levels Of Field Managers And Their Relationships

The Assistant Manager is also accountable for the store and helps the store managers quite a bit with inventory and daily store operating routines. Involved in this is the “overall store operations and security”, which includes making sure all sanitation standards are being followed (Dunkin’s Brand Group, Inc., 2015). They are also a part of the hiring team. Very similar to Assistant Managers are Shift Leaders, as they do a lot of the same jobs as the assistant manager. The main focus is on customer satisfaction and the quality of services being provided. These leaders make sure that “operations run smoothly, efficiently, and according to industry standards while also overseeing and directing employees”

A structure depends on the organization 's objectives and strategy. In a very centralized structure, the highest layer of management has most of the choice creating power and has tight management over departments and divisions. In a much suburbanized structure, the choice creating power is distributed and also the departments and divisions could have totally different degrees of independence. Wal-mart’s structure is built upon its risk management, safety and claims management process. Google Inc. has gained much attention and acclaim for its unusual organizational culture, which is designed to establish loyalty and creativity. Although both Google and Wal-mart focuses on risk management and they specialized on two different factors. Google focus more on creativity, loyalty and keeping its employees happy. Wal-mart tends to help customers by saving money, claims and promoting within the company.

Macy’s seems to have a functional structure, where the employees are grouped depending on their job areas, or function ("Org Chart Macy's", 2017). This includes all the usual departments —HR, Marketing, Legal, etc —and a few that seem pretty normal for a big retail company —Merchandizing, Planning, etc. The stores are also grouped under different regional managers, making the structure also geographic —although I wouldn’t say global — as it’s own department in the hierarchy. Lower on the hierarchy, there are then teams at all the different stores of different managers and

United Parcel Services Inc. has a functional organization structure in the sense that common department such as: marketing, finance, human resource etc. are organized by separating each of and managing them independently. Managers of different functions report up to the Chief Executive Officer (David Abney) who has responsibility for all of the operational areas. The functions are separated by expertise which promotes functional innovation and also it is easy for each department to understand their core responsibilities thus they can be held responsible in case of any

District managers are directly responsible for hiring training and overseeing these new teams. They are also responsible for the ordering receiving and control of the initial inventory.

Managers need to ensure that targets are met and improvements if necessary are made. They need to plan ahead to ensure that their targets are achievable and control the workload to ensure all activities are carried out effectively.

The Assistant Manager is also accountable for the store and helps the store managers quite a bit with inventory and daily store operating routines. Involved in this is the “overall store operations and security”, which includes making sure all sanitation standards are being followed (Dunkin’s Brand Group, Inc., 2015). They are also a part of the hiring team. Very similar to Assistant Managers are Shift Leaders, as they do a lot of the same jobs as the assistant manager. The main focus is on customer satisfaction and the quality of services being provided. These leaders make sure that “operations run smoothly, efficiently, and according to industry standards while also overseeing and directing employees” (Dunkin’s Brand

A managing team would be split up into three groups; top-level, middle and lower. There is specialisation in this managing sector where each group can focus on their own targets so that the large firm on the whole could potentially accomplish. The top level would be responsible for strategic decisions and so they must look into future prospects and be aware of external factors like markets. This can be advantageous, for the firm is looked upon wholly in comparison to the rest of the world. The middle level would be in charge of making the tactical decisions where they are responsible for carrying out choices made by the top level. This part of the sector would be the active doers where they put the ideas into practice. Finally the lower level managing group are responsible for the operational choices. They would concentrate on making sure that the other two are carrying out their goals. They can be portrayed as the motivating unit, to make sure that there isn’t any lack of action. This organisation of the division of labour can be extremely beneficial in achieving their goals. Management has a method where they would start by planning what they will do, following with organising to make optimum use of the resources required. Then there would be some motivation and leading where there would be some exhibition of skills. Lastly some controlling to ensure the plan is being followed. The procedure of

Wal-Marts upper management is far different than that of Target; however their store management is almost a mirrored projection. They have a general manager and two co-managers. After that they have assistant managers, then department managers the quantity of those management positions is based off of store size and volume. Now you have reached the lowest level which is basic, hourly employees. Target stores

Managers perform many functions and play many roles. They are responsible for handling many situations and these situations are usually different from one another.

In every organization there are managers, and every manager is classed on different levels in terms of the skills they need and the activities they are involved in. Managers exist at various levels in the organization hierarchy. A small organization may have one layer of management, where as a large organization may have several. In most organizations there are three level of managers. The three level of managers are, first line manager, middle manager, and finally the top-level manager. Managers at different job levels have different job responsibilities and therefor require different skills.

-As the store managers are empowered to decide what products to be put in the store, their business sense are crucial. However, since the store managers are not expertise in this area, they may not be able to pick hot items and certain sales opportunities may be lost.

In an average retail store, the higher management, which includes the store manager and the assistant manager(s), need to,

Reviews and set quotas (amount of bonus a store manager could make) for each of his/her 6 stores.

From the table we can interpret the perception of the managers. Here store managers seem interesting in most of the portfolio. Store manager given equal ranking for HR function and conceptual part where as HR manager given high priority for staffing only and performance management only. The strategy of the organisation is directed towards change management but HR manager is more concentrate in the staffing and performance only. So as per my view the store manager is more aware in the change process. The turn over is high in organisation but both the manger are not giving it high importance because they rank compensation and safety in low. Store manger seems interested in giving training but HR manger not giving high importance. So in this table what we can say that the coordination is weak and the focus is different. Event though the focus