The Life of Alexander Pope

Even a century long time after his death, Wilfred Owen is still famous for his war poetry written during World War 1. In his poems, Owen uses various language techniques to vividly illustrate the horrendous reality of war. Hence, he communicates his own anti-war feelings, that are embedded beneath his techniques. However, although he is now known as an anti-war poet, for once, he had been a naive boy, who had been pressured by the propaganda and volunteered to fight in war.

In addition, the expression “Pontifux Maximus of nullity” l.52-53 shows how useless it is to write poems, with the aid of both obsolete and didactic language. But, the statement itself is a paradox. The fact that the “pontifux maximus’, which translates to the pope, a worldwide leader consulted for his wisdom, is now useless is contradictory. The reader now understands that some things need to be overlooked. For example, in this case concrete concepts such as words in a poem should not always be taken seriously. The readers should not be

1) Juanita fits the definition of children “at risk” because she was not brought up in a good family home. Her mother held her back from school and never motivated her. She never sent her to pre-school and Juanita did not attend kindergarten until she was 6 years and 9 months old. I do not think that Juanita was born or had a disability. However, I do think that she is very unmotivated and will continue to be this way until she gets the help that she needs, and maybe special programs at school is not enough support.

Throughout the central Middle Ages, Europe was characterized by the power struggle between the secular and the ecclesiastic. The question of rule by God or by man was one which arose with unwavering frequency among scholars, clergy, and nobility alike. The line which separated church and state was blurry at best, leading to the development of the Investiture Conflict in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, and the attempts to undermine the heir to the throne in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Four men stand out among dozens in this effort to define the powers of the lay versus that of the spiritual: Emperor/kings Henry IV and John of England, and the popes who aggressively challenged their exertions of authority, Pope Gregory VII

On May 18, 1920, in a small Polish town just outside of Wadowice, a child was born to Karol Wojtyla (1879-1941, and Emilia Kaczorosks (1884-1929). His name was Karol Jozef Wojtyla. Little did his parents know that one day their child was destined not only to become a priest and a bishop, but the 264th pope of the Roman Catholic Church, and only the second non-Italian pope.

What evidence is there that Alexander may have believed that he was of divine descent? And how convincing would this evidence have appeared to one of his followers?

The age leading up to the first crusade is detailed by many current historians, as well as Pope Urban II, as a time period where inhabitants "rage[d] against [their own] brothers and cut each other [to] pieces" (Peters, Baldric of Dol, 31) for economic and social advancement. In spite of these references, many people today believe that the Pope instigated the crusades for the sole reason of reclaiming Jerusalem. However, other motivations such as supplementary religious factors and the chance for economic, social, and political gain also played major roles. These motivations were not experienced supremely by the Pope; in fact he needed to instill these inspirations in all Christians to evoke their will to fight. The holy land had long

Alexander the Great, Macedonian King (365-323 B.C.), was the son King Philip II and Queen Olympias, who was one of the best kings at that time. He was known conquering the Mediterranean and Persian Empire. Alexander was called the “Great” because of his military mindset and dexterous skills in conquering lands (Mark1). As a young boy, he was put through school and was tutored by a Greek Philosopher, Aristotle (History1). He was also taught to fight and ride by Leonidas of Epirus (Mark1). Then at the age of eighteen, as a prince, he took charge of the Companion Cavalry and helped his father in defeating the Athenian and Theban armies at Chaeronea (History1). Alexander the Great, conqueror of the Persian Empire, was noted for his leadership,

Alexander the Great was the greatest conqueror that ever lived; he led the largest empire in the entire ancient war, he won most of his battles fought, and had the respect and love from everyone. Alexander the Great’s history is incredible, he was a great conqueror and king of Macedonia. Alexander went through a tremendously amount of events in his lifetime.

The definition of hero is a person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. Alexander the Great had courage. He led his men into battle, with no fear what so ever. And it reassured his men. It showed his men the value of going into war bravely.

Alexander the Great and Darius battle demonstrates to us that bigger is not always better. Alexander was more engaged in having a plan to win the battle, and Darius just wanted to fight and win. The great thinking of Alexander helped him win this battle. Alexander knew that he should not push all his soldiers out at the same time. Alexander trained his soldiers well, they knew where to be, and when to strike. In order for Alexander and the soldiers to be successful, they first had to be discipline and have the confidence in Alexander their leader. Alexander was sure that his soldiers could defeat their enemy because he used strategic planning. Alexander guided his men by giving them direction, and he made the decisions that would have his

Pope never knew or realised the trauma men went through during the war. It is clear that both poems have been heavily impacted by the poet's life

Pope John Paul the Second It was recently this year that the Catholic world had lost its leader,

Virgina Woolf was one of the most gifted modernists writers. She started writing novels and trying to compete with others, but she had her own views. She took a stance on poets and people who wrote prose. With her unique style she chose to write in letterform. Her ideas were similar to three other prominent writes. William Woodsworth who was born in 1770 was a prominent writer whose writing was challenged when the war started. He was an orphan and started writing. Eventually he was an influential writer, but took a slightly different stance on prose and poetry then Virginia Woolf. Alexander Pope who was born almost a hundred years earlier was also a writer that many people admired. He showed London and the world his only feelings and his views, which were similar to Woolf. Lastly, the oldest poet Aristotle who was born in 385 B.C. was a Greek who changed writing. He also published their views. While there were many years that separated these individuals they all described an idea that was based off of prose versus poets. All held a high position in society, but show different ideas. Alexander Woolf wrote a letter that held similar ideas to Aristotle, Alexander Pope and William Woodsworth.

The views of women have altered over time, but have always had objectifying tendencies. During the 18th century, cosmetic alteration to natural beauty peaked and materialism heightened throughout societal views. Authors such as Alexander Pope and Jonathan Swift vividly spew these views throughout their writings. Pope’s Rape of the Lock exposes the materialism used in objectifying women, mainly in the upper-class societal levels. The whole plot of the story centers around a cosmetic appearance creating an objectified view, as since the lock of hair was cut from a woman's head, the missing lock became, so called, evidence of a man’s sexual conquest. Other sexual conquests, forced or not, are spoken with anything but love and only those of