preview

The Macroeconomics Of Child Labor

Decent Essays

Most, but not all, historians agree on the fact that parents sent their children to work out of necessity, not want. S.J Kleinberg, a social historian, Kaushik Basu, an economist, and Pham Hoang Van, also an economist, agree that parents had to have working children to survive and ward off destitution. Basu and Van state clearly in their 1998 article, “The Economics of Child Labor” that, “Parents were desperately unhappy about the situations their children were in but could do nothing about it. The social system allowed them no choice." Yet, Thomas Dublin presents a different view in his book, Women at Work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826-1860. He studied the young women working in the Lowell mills. …show more content…

Within this political debate, these different social groups promoted or opposed the legislation for various reasons. Prior to the industrial revolution, the majority of people did not mind child labor; it was not until the introduction of factories during the industrial era that progressives became concerned with child safety. Economists Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti tackle the issue of child labor in their 2005 article, “The Macroeconomics of Child Labor Regulation.” Their article focuses on the different people who would not would not support a ban on child labor during the industrial revolution. They state that, “Workers who compete with children in the labor market support a child labor ban, unless their own working children provide a large fraction of family income.” It is an understandable and obvious conclusion. Adult workers would rather not compete with children in the workforce since children are cheaper laborers and therefore would support a ban on child labor; yet, if their child’s wages add a significant amount to the family wages, then obviously those parents would be against banning child labor. They further their thesis by stating, “…workers' attitudes regarding CLR (child labor regulations) depend not only on the degree to which they compete with children in the labor market, but also on the extent to which their family income relies on child labor.” Parents against the ban had a stronger reason to fight. Economist Cunningham asserts that children contributed more to the family’s earnings than did women, or mothers. Social historian Kleinberg argues that many families that relied on child wages opposed the ban because it would require the mother to go back to work and that would be detrimental to the family. Historian Gratton and economist Moen assert that immigrants opposed a child

Get Access