According to the CDC "the crash rate per mile driven is 3 times higher for 16-17 year olds as compared to 18-19 year olds." Because of the high amount of accidents that happen among young teenagers many have suggested raising the driving age to eighteen rather than sixteen which is the current driving age. The main argument for raising the driving age is that sixteen-seventeen year olds are too immature to be good drivers, but maturity is not the only factor when it comes to making good decisions on the road. The legal driving age should remain at sixteen because it is experience that makes a good driver, and the freedom that comes with driving allows teeagers to become independant people.
The argument that teenagers are too immature to be good drivers doesnt have any solid evidence to support it. Some say that the statistics about teenage accident rates are proof enough for this argument but other factors are involved. The most important factor to consider here is how much experience the driver has. While sixteen is the minimum driving age, sixteen and seventeen year olds
…show more content…
If the driving age were to be raised it would make teenagers reliant on their parents until they graduate highschool and are expected to live on their own. Having a drivers license at sixteen or seventeen allows teenagers to depend on themselves for transportation. It also makes it easier to have a job and begin to look after their own schedules. This is not only liberating for teenagers, but an essential step in preparing people for adulthood. Raising the the driving age to 18 would make this nearly impossible. Rather than having the ability to gradually become more responsible, kids would be forced to remain dependant on their parents until the very moment they legally become adults.Taking on this huge transition all at once with no experience could be disastrous for the futures of young
Many people think it is a good idea to change the driving age from 16 to 18. They think it would reduce crashes and stress on parents. They also think it would help out parents that has jobs. However, I believe raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18 is good because some people has a job, some have sports, and some people are responsible.
There are about 2,000,000 sixteen year old drivers in United States, meaning that almost 2,000,000 million people depend on the current driving age for many things. Having a license at age 16 gives that person opportunities they wouldn’t be able to have without the freedom a car gives, such as getting a job that could help their family, driving themselves to school or sports practice if their parents can’t or being able to see their friends when they want. Having your license at 16 also gives teens a taste of independence and responsibility. The driving age has to stay at sixteen because teens and families depend on it for many things and it introduces a sense of responsibility for the teen.
Second, the government should focus on bigger issues such as drunk driving or speeding. Finally, eighteen year olds will be just as prone to accidents as sixteen year olds. Therefore, the legal driving age should not be raised. In today's world, cars are used continuously and daily.
I understand that individuals want the driving age to be raised. Sixteen-year-olds can be very irresponsible and immature. There are also the safety concerns that can happen, for example, car crashes. However, I believe that the age requirement to drive should stay the same. Teens get the freedom they have been wanting. Teens are able to get jobs to help save up for college. Teens can also learn the responsibilities that come with driving or owning a vehicle. Therefore, what I am trying to say is sixteen-year-olds are responsible enough to
One of these reasons is instead of punishing drivers who are responsible, we should make getting the license harder. Although this may keep the most reckless drivers off of the road and save some lives, it would still allow careless accidents by inexperienced teens to occur. A research showed that a new driver who was seventeen or eighteen was a safer driver than a new driver who was sixteen (Davis, p.249). One year does make a difference. It also proves that time is more important than practice when it comes to driving. Another reason people say we should keep the driving age the same is because it is more convenient for parents and teens. Although no one enjoys being inconvenienced, saving lives is more important than saving time. Despite the fact that there are some good arguments as to why the driving age should be kept the same, there are many ways these arguments can be
The minimum driving age should be raised because teen drivers need more experience and deadly car crashes will decrease. As a teenager one of the many things wanted is freedom and independence. Although knowing what you want is a good thing, it is not so good to take a risk on something as serious as driving and have a “know-it all” attitude. With motor vehicle crashes being the leading cause of death for U.S. teens, raising the minimum driving age is a very important decision. When considering this change we need to remember that it is a decision that will affect all of us.
Raising the age was not an idea based on opinions. Over the years many people and organizations have recorded facts and statistics to support their claims. An example shown on CBS News, shows that “More than 5,000 U.S. teens die each year in car crashes. The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59, according to the National Highway Safety Administration” (CBS NEWS). One huge influence on the topic was the Insurance Institutes for Highway Safety, they created a seventeen page memo filled with statistics and examples of how raising the age is a necessity. This is not the first attempt to use statistics to support the appeal to raise the age. The Seattle Times states, “The example the institute uses most prominently is New Jersey, the only state with a minimum driver's license age of 17. The report cited a study from 1992-96 in which the rate of crash-related deaths among 16- and 17-year-olds was 18 per 100,000 in New Jersey, compared with 26 per 100,000 in Connecticut, which had a minimum driver's license age of 16 and 4 months” (Willette). Overall the argument that raising the age will result in less teen deaths while driving is highly justified. There are frequent examples and a huge amount of research that proves that younger drivers are more likely to cause harm or damage than an older, more experienced driver.
Young drivers should have to wait until they are 18 years old to get their license because 16 year olds are more likely to get in an accident than an older driver. One author said, “Sixteen-year-old drivers are the most likely to crash, so raising the age at which teens could get their license would save many lives…” (Rubin). Rubin gives a valid reason to why the minimum driving age should be raised from 16 to 18. If the driving age is raised, there would be less people involved in wrecks, which would help the world out as a whole. Even though 16 year olds are more accident prone than other drivers, taking 16 year olds off of the road would save the lives of everyone on the road. However, there are people who believe that the minimum driving age should not be raised because of various reasons. One article states that, “If they have to wait until they are 17 or 18, they remain dependent on parents practically until they are ready to go off to college, join the military or take a
The first reason that one might say that they need to increase the driving age is drunk driving. Drunk driving is illegal and causes so multifarious deaths, and teens are part of this too. As an example, “ Teen Crashes: Everyone is at Risk”, stated that driver ages 15-17 were involved in… fatal crashes that claimed the lives of 30,917 people” from 1995 through 2004”(Males). Drunk driving can lead to even further disastrous stuff related to jail time or even death.
The reasons why the driving age should be increased to 18 is because they are not fully responsible for obeying the traffic laws, they get distracted easily, and they are just not capable of having the responsibility of driving a car. Teenagers the age of 16 have caused many car accidents in the past years due to the fact that teenagers are not ready to drive at 15 with a permit, they are just not fully ready to drive. It's a huge responsibility and a huge risk to the society. Parents should be more involved in their children's driving. If one does not teach their children to obey when their driving then they never will.
If the age of driving is raised that would’t give teen a sense of responsibility at a young age. Parents always whine because teens aren’t being responsible enough. One way for a teen to gain responsibility is by teaching them to drive so they can learn how to manage money, get a job, and be a responsible behind the wheel. One way to teach a teen how to drive responsible is by talking and showing what they need to do when they drive when the teen gets their permit. When it comes to driving teens need to know when the car is acting up, how to work everything in the car, to have a clean car, be sure they know to keep the car gassed up, know how to check the oil, to follow the laws, and many different items.
The big debate as to whether the legal driving age should be raised to eighteen is an ongoing issue. There are both arguments for and against this matter. Younger drivers, as well as old ones, can cause many life-threatening accidents; therefore, raising the minimum driving age could significantly reduce the number of accidents. The accident rates can be lowered considerably if the legal driving age is bumped up to eighteen. This would mean that no more kids could get hurt or worse, killed in a car accident.
The driving age should stay at 16 because it gives teens freedom. It gives teens freedom because if they don't want to be around there parents they can just leave and go hang out with there friends. If the
A big argument during this time is whether the legal driving age should stay at sixteen or change to a higher age like eighteen. There are many reasons why the legal driving age should stay at sixteen. These reasons include maturity, safety issues, and saving lives. This includes both sides of the story; adults and teenagers. The legal driving age should stay at sixteen, and the teens should be careful so they can be a mature and safe driver, and they do not get killed in an accident.
CRASH! as two cars gets into an car accident killing an elderly woman while a teenage who is responsible behind the wheel drunk after coming from a party that his friend was having. Because, of safety concerns many states have increased the age at which teens can began to drive. Your state legislature is considering raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18. Do you think the driving age should be raised?. Some think that the driving age shouldn't be raise because, that would give teenagers the opportunity to have more experience in driving as they get older. Others think the state should raise the driving age because teens are not ready to be on the road driving just yet. Although, i think that the driving age should increase because most teens are immature