The Management Approach Espoused By Tony And Malcom

Chapter 2: The classical approaches (scientific management, administrative principles, and bureaucratic organization) share a common assumption: people at work act in a rational manner that is primarily driven by economic concerns. Scientific Management: in 1911, Fredrick W. Taylor published The Principles of Scientific Management, in which he made the following statement: “The principle object of management should be to secure maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for the employee. He noticed that many workers did their jobs their own ways and without clear and uniform specifications. He believed this caused them to lose efficiency and underperform. He believed the problem would be fixed by scientific

Organisations, manages and many other factors have all helped change and structure the way that organisations are managed and sustained. Various different styles and techniques have been trailed and tested over the many years and from the strict regime that henry ford (ford motors) started to conform, to the current way organisations such as google are managed are two different foundations and styles. This assignment will examine and compare the variance in styles and look at the way this has changed over the years with contributing factors such as technology changing the way organisations are producing and organizing their products, services and staff and will argue that although factors such as health and safety are a positive for consumer and worker, that this could cause other factors such as productivity to fall short of expectations, quality and service. The three main points that will be discussed are scientific management, human relations and contemporary practises. Is the more scientific approach the best practice? Or as time has moved on is the modern contemporary practice more beneficial towards organisations and employees?

From this comes the argument that today we have moved into a knowledge economy and a new style of management must replace the now obsolete Scientific Management which was designed for standardized physical tasks. Gary Hamel terms this new style ‘Management 2.0’.

Revans, R. (1958). On "Management and the Scientific method" The Journal of the British Institute of Management. Retrieved May 12, 2015.

There was a reason behind this great shift in management theory. The main driving force behind this change was the transition of businesses from the entrepreneurial capitalism to managerial capitalism. This shift forced managers and experts to treat the development of management as a science and to apply scientific principles to it. This idea of scientific management was started by a man named Frederick Taylor. He developed a radical approach known as scientific management. Frederick conducted studies into how employees or that machines they use perform tasks. He measured and analyzed each measurable aspect of everything they do. From this data he was able to calculate better estimates and ordering of task while still getting the most efficiency. By doing this, he gave his managers a realistic standard to

Compare and contrast two theories of leadership. Do these theories offer practical guidance for managers?

Concern for production speaks to how a leader accomplishes organizational goals and objectives while concern for people pays attention to the staff in the company or organization that are chartered to reach goals (Northouse, 2013). The Leadership Grid is established by drawing the horizontal axis representing the leader’s concern for results and the vertical axis representing the leader’s concern for people. A score is assigned for each of these dimensions with a range from 1 (minimum) to 9 (maximum) concern. Plotting the respective scores from each axes provides a look at various leadership styles. There are five styles of leadership identified: Team Management, Middle of the Road Management, Impoverished Management, Authority-Compliance, and Country-Club Management (Northouse, 2013).

He describes his leadership, and management roles as being democratic and relational. He recognizes that for any significant amount of success to be attainable, especially in a school setup like this one, it is imperative that all the individuals charged with various responsibilities get to do them mostly out of their own volition. This may only be possible to attain if the directives they use to go about the day to day activities at the school

There are many people who holds a specific title are not capable of being leaders. Frederick Taylor's theory of scientific management developed techniques for improving the efficiency of the work process. Based on a systematic study of people, tasks and work behavior, Taylor's theory broke the work process down into the smallest possible units, or sub-tasks, to determine the most efficient method possible for completing a job. Comparing the point of view of Fredrick Taylor and proponents of scientific management with the point of view of a leader describe by

His management style is consistent with the Assumptions of Theory Y Leadership, and many of his movements in recent years support a core tenant of the theory, that “The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but to seek responsibility.” (Daft, Chapter 2: Evolution of Managment Thinking)

The twentieth century has brought in a number of management theories which have helped shaped our view of management in the present business environment. These emerging theories have enabled managers to appreciate new patterns of thinking, new ways of organising and new ways of managing organisations and people. Over the years these different theories have enabled the study

Doyle, M. E. and Smith, M. K. (2001). Classical models of managerial leadership: trait, behaviors, contingency, and transformational theory. ‘Classical leadership’, the encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/leadership/traditional_leadership.htm.

In the beginning section, Joan Gallos compiles works that seeks to answer the common question concerning leadership, what is leadership? John Kotter contends, “Leadership is different from management” (as cited in Gallos, 2008, p. 5). Kotter insists that there are clear differences between leadership and management. For example, leadership deals with change within an organization. Whereas, management concentrates on developing a system to bring order to an organization. Consequently, skills needed for leadership are divergent from the skills needed for management.

Management has been studied by a lot of theorists who then learning from their own experiences came out with different theories and styles of management, explaining how to manage. The classical school has proven to be one of the most influential of all the schools. (Brooks 2009). Due to the success of the bureaucratic and scientific management style of managing, this essay will look into the bureaucratic style of management and then the scientific style of management and show that although these theories were developed during the turn of the twentieth century, they are still present in organisations today and are still very relevant to this day and age.

Leadership has been described as “a process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task”. In the case study Josh Martin uses much different leadership techniques than Tom Saunders which, in summary, can be seen as a quite different style. In the book ‘Management’ leadership is discussed in relation to management. ”Management and