The Mandatory Levels Of Schooling Essay

Legislation relating to employment exists to stop exploitation of workers by their employers mainly to protect the rights of their employee’s and to make sure that they have everything they need such as.

Consider the following situation: A car is driving past the local elementary school on a hot and sunny July afternoon. As the car approached the school the driver notices some unusual things. Students are outside with the teachers for recess, and it looks as if school is in session. The school is on a year-round schedule. The driver is intrigued and decides to do some research. From the research, this person found that students are achieving more academically and the teachers are well rested.

One of the main issues with merit pay for teachers is found in the manner in which it is measured. Most of the new performances pay laws and union contracts measure “effectiveness,” at least in part, by looking at the students’ test scores from one year to the next. One test score cannot paint a full picture of a student's accomplishment. Teachers unions have historically opposed merit pay, arguing that test scores are not an accurate measure of student achievement (Turner, 2010, para 15). Most teachers will report that a test will only show part of the picture. Standardized tests do not reflect life lessons, effective citizen traits, or character building traits that were taught that year. All of these traits thrive in an effective teacher’s curriculum.

Another option offered by Minnesota high schools is a post-secondary enrollment option. This option is comprised of two programs offered to high school sophomores, juniors, and seniors: the Post-Secondary Education Option (PSEO) and College in the Schools (CIS). These programs are administered by the Minnesota Department of Education and offer high school students to enroll in college courses while still attending high school. The PSEO program allows the students to attend a local college or university that has been approved to be offered to high school students. The College in the Schools option allows high school students to take the college level course from a certified high school teacher. In this option however the high school

In the state of South Carolina, public school's students are educated on the basis of a minimally adequate education. South Carolina legislators have interpreted the definition for minimally adequate education, given by the South Carolina Supreme Court, into curriculum requirements for students across the state. South Carolina legislators’ curriculum expectations for graduating high school students are below average. In relation, the students of South Carolina are being hindered from seeing and reaching their full potential by being “normed” to do below average work. Minimally adequate education provides a foundation for inequity in schools and leaves students unprepared for

Robert Lehnen and Guodong Liang talk about incentive pay programs and how productivity are affected by equivalent and bonus pay. According to Liang, incentive pay will be able to motivate teachers given that their hard work as a teacher pays off through increased pay. Lehnen also has a similar point when viewing different perspectives of teacher pay in Indiana. First, he talks about the 10-month work year that teachers have, saying it is a benefit and reason for lower salaries among teachers. Also, according to Lehnen (1994), the Indiana State Chamber of Commerce looks at test scores to consider performance among teachers and if scores are not high, spending within the districts will remain the same. Liang presents an incentive based pay, rather than Lehnen bringing other perspectives to the table concerning the necessity of raising pay compared to high test

Amazing teachers are deciding to leave their jobs everyday because of the stress and pressure to teach standards that will appear on assessments (“Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing.”). These standardized assessments are often used in order to evaluate teachers as well. This is not fair to those teachers who go above and beyond when teaching their students. If one of their students just simply does not care and therefore gets a low score, this falls back on the teacher. In the article, “Do Student Test Scores Provide Solid Bases to Evaluate Teachers”, David Plotnikoff talks about this system by arguing that, evaluations based off of test scores should not be used when making “high-stakes individual personnel decisions such as merit pay or teacher ranking” due to their unreliability. It is not fair to the great teachers of this country to be evaluated based off of students who can only be influenced so much. All of this corruption and failure found in the educational system adds to the many reasons of why America is not the greatest country in the

The first issue Parsons tackles in his article is the differences between high school teachers and university professors. He makes sure to begin by stating, “I am your professor, not your teacher. There is a difference.” (Parsons) He evaluates teachers as only caring about test scores. This implies that teachers in high school only care whether or not their students make a decent grade on a test instead of actually learning the material. This seems to be an unfair judgment of teachers but due to state requirements is a sad but true fact. The article, “NEA Survey: Nearly Half of Teachers Consider Leaving Profession Due to Standardize Testing”, states that according to the NEA (National Education Association) survey, “a majority of teachers reported

However, many people feel that these tests do not measure any sort of knowledge, but rather indicates the economic background the child came from. According to Kohn, a major spokesperson on the damaging effects of standardized testing, ?What standardized tests actually measure best is the economic backgrounds of the groups that take them? (Gallagher). If you broke down the income of the test takers family and measured it in increments of $10,000 you would get a graph where for each increment of income the students score would undoubtedly increase directly. This is because higher income areas have more teaching resources readily available which gives the students a varied and comprehensive learning environment and also attracts more qualified teachers. The high salaries and vast resources available attract many well-qualified teachers vying for the space. Therefore, the school district has an advantage of a larger pool in which to choose the most qualified teacher. These factors can give the students an advantage which makes the standardized tests a poor scale of students or schools progress but rather a good scale of their economic background.

The lack of funding in public school systems also leads to underpaid and often undereducated teachers. These teachers are often never given the tools to succeed when such changes like the C.C.S.S. come about. When we fail to continue the education of those who educate our young, we, therefore, fail to succeed academically as a society. States are not merely missing academic criterion because they have low expectations or no motivation, but because we are failing to provide them with the necessary tools and resources to educate children at an acceptable level. By promoting standardized testing, we are essentially setting our children and our future up for failure.

​I strongly believe that all teachers should be evaluated fairly. An evaluation is an important tool used both by administration and teachers to identify areas of strength and weakness and determine ways to increase effective instructional practice in the classroom. However, I do not believe that teachers’ pay and positions should be based on the performance of their students on standardized tests. Thinking back to the days when it came time for standardized testing, I knew that I would not do well. I never tested well no matter how hard I tried. I consistently received high scores on papers I wrote and did well on assignments, but my standardized test scores produced much different results. My sister, on the other hand was just the opposite. The teachers were not at fault because I did not test well and I do not blame them when I scored poorly.

General education requirements, or GERs, in universities are basically what the name implies, "General." These courses are too vague in terms of helping each student succeed. The requirements are suppose to help each student become more well-rounded but this is done by pounding useless information in students' minds within a short amount of time. Therefore, students are paying money to learn about things that they will forget the next semester. General education requirements need to be revised to help students learn more about what they are in school for. Major specific GERs are a necessity in universities because they save time and money for students. These more specific GERs would also better students in their adult lives because they

Although I was already disgruntled with the lack of compensation for all the extra roles I filled at my school, now I had to reexamine my role in the classroom and link my performance to my students’ performance in a new evaluation system. My salary (not bonus) would be directly reflective of my students’ achievement (or regression) on one state mandated test. My mind filled with questions: What if my students had a bad test day? What if the continuous pressure from all

The education system has been a controversial issue among educators. Requirements of school do not let student choose what they want to study for their future. It’s a big issue to force student study specific curriculums, which don’t help them improve, and what they like to create something. Educators choose a general system for education to all students which based on general knowledge. Intelligent or genius students have to be in that system of education, which doesn’t let them improve their creativity. Educators attempt to change that system to make it better, but their changing was not that great to be an example for the world. Also, did that change qualify education system to compete other systems or not? In some examples and

Graduate or professional education is an often-debated topic for a large number of University seniors. Regardless of the undergraduate degree many students must decide whether to enter the job market or go to school for another couple of years. When these students are faced with this decision it is important to look at what they consider. Is it job satisfaction, future pay, or the mere fact that they want to spend a few more years in college? These issues are all very important to students in very different manners.