The Many Types Of Leaders Essay

From the vantage point of the present, it is easy to look back at the tenure of any great leader and draw conclusions about just what it was that made him/her great. We can examine the circumstances under which their leadership flourished; piece together what we know of their character and personality traits; delve into the factors that may have driven them; and dissect their leadership style all in an effort to pinpoint the source of their success. The ‘Great Man’ theory, popular in the 19th century and now thoroughly debunked, held that leaders are born, not made; suggesting that men like George Washington, Martin Luther King Jr., and Winston Churchill were born with the innate capacity to change the world (Landis,

unique voices. While some philosophers have similar opinions on what it takes to be an effective leader, such as intelligence and worldliness, there are many that disagree on traits they find beneficial. The reasons for these disagreements are vast but one of the crucial factors are the societies and historical eras these authors were nurtured within. Through their own experiences with government and turmoil, philosophers are able to give their critiques on government and human nature as a whole. Socrates and Machiavelli, both philosophers in what it means to be a proper leader and the role of the people within a society, share contrasting views.

As many countries developed over time, changes have occurred that benefited the citizens of each nation. However, there is one important element that is needed to establish laws, peace, and harmony in each country. This element is known as leadership. Leaders around the world have contributed to the success and evolution of all of our nations, proving to be a huge responsibility. Residents are dependent amongst leaders, who are in charge of protecting their citizens at no cost. Without the presence of them, chaos and corruption would establish, which could ruin relationships and trade with other nations. In history, great leaders have been praised and admired. The characteristics of three great leaders, who are Suleiman, Nelson Mandela, and Queen Elizabeth I, have exhibited the qualities of being a great leader. These traits include causing admiration and inspiration, demonstrating intelligent knowledge, and guiding residents and themselves to solve conflicts that may cause death.

There are several different leadership styles used within the public services. Therefore there are many varied suggestions that define someone as being a strong leader. However a ‘leadership style’ is a unique style that people recognise to encourage or influence other people in a way others do not so that they admire and want to be like. A team leader’s role in the public services is to provide instruction and direction and guidance and leadership this is to help inspire and encourage the team to reach their goals and aims. They have to keep the team focused on there current task or tasks and be able to communicate within their group

Abraham Lincoln, Adolf Hitler, Augustus Cesar, Joan of Arc, Napoleon Bonaparte. Can anyone tell me what all these people have in common? (brief pause) All these people were great leaders. Now when I say “great”, I am not necessarily referring to their morals or political world view. Perhaps better term would be “influential” leaders. And interestingly enough, all of the leaders mentioned were also in some capacity involved with the military. However, before all these, one man was so prominent in terms of his leadership and accomplishments that the for-mentioned and many other leaders today follow in his footsteps to some respect. His name was Alexander the Great. Now you might ask yourself, “what in the world makes Alexander the Great so,

In the Republic of Plato book VI, Published sometime in 380 B.C. Greek philosopher Socrates sets to explain why the philosopher would be the ideal ruler for the city. He knows what makes a good philosopher and that justice and goodness are important for administering a just society for citizens, in which he rules. He believes the philosopher is best fitted to rule because he truly understands the nature of reality and everything that comes along with it despite the negative beliefs that may have been brought upon them. In the reading, Socrates demonstrates why philosophers should control the city.

As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.

Leadership Evaluation and Philosophy: An Appraisal of Angela Merkel’s Leadership during the Euro Crisis and My Leadership Philosophy

Becoming an effective leader is a lot like being in the stock market. You don 't make your fortune in a day; you make it daily, a little bit at a time. What matters most is what you do day after day, over the long haul. The secret to leadership success is investing in your leadership development, much like letting your assets compound. The final result is "Leadership Growth" over time.

The topic of effective leadership is one that has prompted numerous, differing opinions. While people who are not philosophers believe that they should be able to rule the state, philosophers disagree completely and insist that only they can lead efficiently. The argument of the philosophers can be strengthened by the words of Plato, who makes his opinion on the topic clear in the provided quote. As can be seen, he asserts that, in order to rule the state effectively, the ruler must “learn the nature of the Absolute Good.” Because Plato believes that only philosophers are able to know about the Absolute Good, as they are the only ones who have a complete perception of reality, he feels that only philosophers can rule the state adequately.

To me, leadership is more than a title. It is more than just being in charge. Leadership is honestly, learning, listening, and most importantly application. Leadership means going the extra mile or two, doing the right thing no matter who’s looking, staying encouraged and encouraging other even when times are hard and you have every reason to quit. Leadership doesn’t mean you’re rich, well known, liked, or respected but it does mean you are a passionate, caring, and authentic. Leadership means you care about something so much you are willing to risk everything you have for this belief or idea. Leadership is doing whatever you can in your power to make things better for those around you.

History is ripe with stories of great men.  Hundreds of politicians, philosophers, performers, and writers have left a unique stamp on humanity.  But only a select few can be said to have "changed history."  The legendary Athenian, Socrates, was one such figure.  Socrates ushered in an era of philosophical inquiry that still lingers to this day.  In Book Seven of Plato's The Republic, Socrates outlines his perfect regime.  According to Socrates, an enlightened "Philosopher-King" must rule such a regime.  Now suppose this Republic actually came into being, and Socrates was asked to rule it as a Philosopher King.  Would he?  Answering this begs three important questions:  Is Socrates a true philosopher?  Does he have the

I define leadership as the ability to provide strength and coverage to support a Sailor, regardless of rank. The ability to instill Core Values, provide training and the tools a Sailor will need to excel in both their professional and personal life. A true leader will support a Sailor, any Sailor, during the high times of a career, but to be a solid force if there are any lows.

The basic premise for leadership is the process of influencing other people to follow your lead in order to accomplish a goal. It is about the relationship between the leader and the followers. A good leader tries to motivate people to bring about positive changes revealing a common objective without using coercion or manipulation. Leadership is not about control, but permitting interaction and communication between the leader and the individual followers. With empowering others, leaders build a foundation of collaborative thinking and encourage an atmosphere of personal involvement; a leader can strengthen the respect and loyalty of his or her followers. Leaders can affect this process by applying their own personal characteristics, such

Determination, courage, and confidence are all characteristics needed to be a good leader. The principal player in a music group is considered to be a leader. Even bands need leaders, if we didn’t have leaders where would we be today? John Quincy Adams once said, “If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.” A good leader is liked by the people, has power, and produces followers. When there is an unwillingness to make things happen, to take the initiative and accept responsibility; this is when a leader emerges. Leaders develop through drive, creativity, and devotion.