The Marketing Objectives Of Clorox

The JW Anderson product range consists of menswear, womenswear and unisex garments and accessories. They currently produce six collections annually - two menswear and four womenswear.

Grilling is engraved in American culture as well as a highly seasonal activity. Kingsford Charcoal is in the business of selling charcoal for grills. Even though Kingsford increased its market share in 2000, their forecast indicates they will not reach the initial revenue mark. With the charcoal market’s growth slowing, and the gas grill market gaining market share, Kingsford needs to revise its strategy, and their marketing mix to meet original expectations for itself and Clorox. The following report will identity the issues Kingsford faces in the market place and recommend actions to take to resolve these problems. First we will examine

A second alternative could be to increase their advertising budget because it has been the only brand within the charcoal industry that has been advertising. Their advertising budget is currently very low so with an increase in spending it could definitely generate more attraction and promote Kingsford charcoal as the better alternative.

Expand Product Line: Kingsford has the option to set the pace for charcoal innovation by expanding product lines to generate additional interest in charcoal grilling. Engineering more environmentally friendly, flavor imparting and scented charcoals such as vanilla or mint flavored charcoal may do this. In response to the trending up of gas grill usage from previous years, Kingsford could consider entering into wood chips production for gas grills. Additionally, to prevent seeing charcoal as a seasonal product, awareness could be drawn to other uses of charcoal, such as an odor remover in the home or a type of soil amendment by gardeners to improve crop growth. Education on these other uses will increase demand for charcoal all year round and not just during the warm months when grilling is prevalent.

Currently, it has 2 products marketed under “Kingsford” brand name; Regular – “Blue Bag” and Instant – “Red Bag”. It enjoys steady revenue growth since 1980s, but sales statistics for FY2000 shows that there would be a drop in volume growth, which will have a major impact in its net profit. As a market leader, Kingsford maintains its market share, but the main concern will be the performance of entire charcoal category which declines in terms of shipping and penetration trends (Figure 1). The company has been practicing sales orientation, focusing to sustain market share within charcoal category and has been reducing advertising budget.

The goal of the promotional activity is to increase the sales and consumers consumption of the all charcoal category by optimizing merchandising, assortment, pricing and shelving. By example, within the merchandising, they

The biggest impediment is that the Clorox enters an already existing market and the dominant market leader, PUR, has well developed its “PUR Ultimate” system. Moreover Procter & Gamble are about to take control over PUR. It is also likely that the sale of

Kingsford had reduced its media spending from over $6 million in 1998 to a little over $1 million in 2000. Gas Grill increased its media spending during the same time period. * Reduction in Promotions: Royal Oak had contributed substantial funds towards merchandising opportunities at retailers such as temporary price reductions, features and displays. Kingsford’s merchandising in 2000 was consistent with that in 1999. * Weather Pattern: Precipitation and temperature comparison with 1999 showed a slight increase in rainfall in October through December 2000, coupled with major drop in temperatures. Cold weather reduced the opportunities for grilling occasions. * Lack of R&D: Kingsford was consistent with research and development and had spent $63 million since 1998. Kingsford’s research team not focused on how to overcome to Gas Grill. Lack of research on what makes the charcoal easy to use and require less preparation. These key problems cause the decline in the Sales. Let’s see what are the alternatives available to this key problems and how can we overcome with it. Some of the Key problems require funding, for example Media Advertising.

Colgate-Palmolive Co (CP) was an international leader in household and personal care product, with the sales of $6.06 billion and profit of $2.76 billion in 1991. CP set up a five-year plan in 1991, pointing out that company needed to focus on new product launching and entry into new geographic markets by improving the manufacturing, distribution and the continuance of the core consumer products. Started from 1984, CP’s CEO awaked the company from “sleepy and inefficient” to profitable. Both gross margin and annual volume growth increased from 1985. Although everything seemed good, CP was facing the worldwide strong competitions from other companies. In order to have some protections, 170 CP’s

So her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G mouthwash business for the next 3 years. In preparing the 3 year plan for Scope, a team has been formed within P&G to examine various options, the team included individuals from product development, manufacturing, sales, finance, market research and advertising operations. The team was faced by two options that are: 1- Launching a new line extension positioned against Plax as a recent entry into the market. 2- Looking at claims other than “breath” that might be used by scope such as plaque reduction.

Proctor and Gamble-Scope is faced with a very important decision, they need to prepare a marketing plan for P&G’s mouthwash business for the next three years. They want to know how they are going to be able to

If Clorox does not restructure its portfolio mix and increase revenue contribution from the growing markets, it faces the risk of losing sales and its position in those markets. Using its current resources, Clorox needs to determine how to allocate those resources among its current brand portfolio. Equally important is determining whether to invest in new product lines or brands. Clorox also has to decide whether to expand into international markets or focus strictly on expanding its market share across its brands in the primary U.S. market. Asian, South American, and European markets offer potential for growth but the cost of expanding into these markets and the limited availability of financial resources pose concerns with respect to international expansion. Focus on growth versus profitability is another important strategic decision that needs to be addressed. Clorox projects flat sales for 2011, which is not a positive indicator for investors’

The main issue of the P&G Korea case is centered around the question of market share. P&G and Unilever are the two major market shareholders in the Korean detergent industry holding 80-85% of the total market share. The remaining 15-20% of the market is held by low-priced local Korean brands. There are no new markets either company can tap for further market share since most Korean households already use laundry detergent, making the market saturated. Other than peripheral chemical changes claimed to be “improvements”, there are no major innovations to be explored for product development or diversification. Per Ansoff’s strategic opportunities matrix, P&G and Unilever are both focused on Market Penetration,

The Procter & Gamble business strategy is to focus on creating new brands and categories so the company can focus on being the best in branding, innovation and scale. This is what sets this company apart from many of its competitors. The Proctor and Gamble are the global leader in all of their core businesses within the company which consists of laundry, baby care, hair care and feminine protection. This report is designed to understand the company’s business model and strategies, and analysis how the P&G has formulated its business-level strategies to pursue its business model.

product segments – Oral, Personal and Home Care; and Pet Nutrition. The company operates in more than 200 countries and this geographic diversity and balance help to reduce the Company’s exposure to businesses and other risks in any one country or part of the world. The company’s main competitors are Proctor & Gamble (PG), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Church Dwight & Company (CHD) and Clorox & Company (CLX).