The Masconduciton: A Short Story

On July 22, 2017 at approximately 6:07 PM I, Deputy Hill along with Sergeant Bowring, Deputy Dimert and Deputy George received word that Wayne Jones was at 155 CR 1686 and had a class B warrant. Deputy George had spoken with a complainant on the phone that informed Deputy George that he had seen Wayne Jones in the area and know that Mr. Jones had a warrant for his arrest. After Deputy George informed me of the information I contacted France Young a residence of the area, I asked Mrs. Young if she had seen Mr. Jones and Mrs. Young confirmed that Mr. Jones was at 155 CR 1686. After verifying the warrant on Mr. Jones though dispatch all the above units check en route to that location.

in handcuffs, per my training, then walked her out of the bingo hall and to my

Larry was transported by AMR to Chino Valley Community Hospital. At Chino Valley Hospital, Larry claimed that he was Tased and was complaining of pain to his stomach and back. Larry was not Tased by OPD officers. I looked at Larry’s stomach and back and did not see any redness nor any visible injuries. I read Larry his Miranda rights from my department issued Miranda card. He said “yes” to all four questions indicating that he understood them. Under Miranda, Larry told me that today in the morning, his girlfriend, Stephanie Perez, dropped him off at work and they got into an argument. Larry said the argument was over Perez wanting to leave him. I asked Larry if he threatened Perez in anyway and he said no he did not threatened Perez. Larry said today at approximately 1730 hours, he was picked up by Perez from work. Larry said they drove to a check cashing place so he could cash his check. Larry said he and Perez got into an argument. The argument was again about Perez wanting to leave him. Larry said he took the vehicle key from the vehicle and went inside the store, preventing Perez from driving away. I asked him if he saw the police unit. Larry said yes he did however he was scared and did not want to be detained or arrested because he did not do anything wrong. Larry said he several times heard police officers telling him to stop running however he did not want to get arrested. Larry said he

Calhoun forwarded me his findings and informed me the incident occurred on Evening Watch, I viewed the incident on Avigilon video and determined a use of force incident report need to be completed in Blue Team. I then notified Sgt. Kizer-Hudson, who was the supervisor over 8NE, and inquired on if she was aware that the use of force incident occurred. She replied, “No.” I proceeded to show Sgt. Kizer-Hudson the video and she stated, “I remember the incident the officers called a non-compliant I responded, but they didn’t tell me about the use of force part.” I replied, what did they tell you?” Sgt. Kizer-Hudson stated, “Officer R. Dunans stated he give Inmate Mitchell verbal commands to return to his cell, inmate Mitchell refused and wanted to speak to a supervisor.” I advised Sgt. Kizer-Hudson the incident wasn’t reported and I found out about the incident when Mitchell’s attorney sent an email about his outcry. I then instructed Sgt. Kizer-Hudson to start a use of force report in Blue Team, and get statements from all officers involved as to why they failed to report the use of force to

P alleges false arrest. P alleges that she was hanging out with her friends after school when defendant MOS Jose Peinan became flirting with her. P alleges that she did not respond to MOS Peinan causing MOS Peinan to become angry. P alleges that MOS Peinan ordered two male MOS to arrest P and her friend, Marie Gonzales (non-party). P alleges that one of the male MOS patted her down and touched her breast. P alleges she was handcuffed and placed in a police van and taken to the 52 precinct. P alleges that she was denied food bought by her mother at the precinct. P also alleges that her request to have the handcuffs loosen was denied. MOS stated that they were conducting a UC buy and bust narcotics operation when P and Ms. Gonzales approached

P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges it was West Indian Day Parade weekend and large group of individuals were on the streets. P alleges there was individual who was speaking against police brutality. P alleges she was walking away from him when MOS threw her against the wall and handcuffed her. P alleges the MOS denied her medical attention and transported her to the precinct. P alleges that she was taken to the hospital from the precinct. MOS Raymond Weng states that MOS were directing the gather which had gather to disperse. There was a male who refused to leave the location. When MOS went to arrest him and he resisted, then P began pushing MOS away from the male. MOS Weng states that P attempt to strike his supervising

Plaintiff claims false arrest and malicious prosecution. Plaintiff states he was arrested for criminal possession of marijuana however no marijuana was recovered. PO Hernandez, PO Bonet, and PO Heredia were members of the anti-crime in PSA 6. Officers observed via Viper camera plaintiff and two other apprehended individuals smoking marijuana in the park behind a housing project. Officers approached plaintiff and two individuals and conducted a stop and frisk. Officers did not recover any contraband or marijuana was recovered. Plaintiff and the two individuals were transported to the precinct where a bag of marijuana was recovered during a search at the precinct. Officers could not determine ownership of the marijuana therefore all three were

It was Wednesday, August 12th and I was just about to enjoy lunch with Sarah Lucas when I received a message on my phone, “PIPING PLOVER AT CONNEAUT.” Lunch was over - I quickly grabbed my Binoculars and my camera and I was off!!!

Dershowitz, I want to first ay that I agree that officers should be accountable for their actions. I understand that officers use the what is called the "Blue Shield of Silence" which simply means that the officers would keep quiet if there were investigated by Internal Affairs or by fellow officers. If the judges have to believe the officer over the criminal at all times, the judge should be presented with all the officers before the trial and make sure that the accounts of the event are accurate. Officers will make will always ensure that one of their own is protected. I understand the code is important, but sometimes the wrong person is accused and may lead to the public not trusting the legal system. What's to say that the prosecutors are not in on convicting the wrong person. The legal system should be monitored differently I know the supreme court is like the last defense. Someone or a group that is not influenced should be on the trail to make sure that the trial went how it supposed to go and that no one's rights were violated. When you said that you had a client that was committed of wrongdoing, and the officer denied everything under oath, the officer should've be sent to a board or hearing. If someone lies under oath, they can do time and the legal system should be accountable also. Officers have too much leniency with the legal system and that kind of hurts the public and the ones that do their

There is a specific place on Division St. where there are men unemployed waiting on someone to pick them up to give them a job for the day. These men are usually mexicans who are immigrants and can’t find a job; my dad takes maximum three guys. At the end of the day they are dropped off on Division street around the same time many others finish their work. My dad did not have enough cash to divide the pay therefore, he calls me to lend him some cash. When I get there, the police had arrived checking everyone's pockets and shoes. It seemed that they had the impression of my dad and his workers were dealing with drugs. I felt a deception towards the cops, although you actually never know when someone possesses drugs. That day I learned that it's unpredictable what people might think of one and should learn how to defend oneself and that is by knowing human

This is a case about 2 teenagers accused of killing one person’s mother, his sister and a family friend. In the information found, you will see how the police coerced the confessions but it was only after a family member asked if he really did it. When he finally told her he did not do it, it was only then that things turned around for them. It’s sad that justice was not served for these 2 men. The police saw an opportunity to deceive 2 young black males and they felt compelled or even tricked to confess to a crime they did not commit. You will see in the case files below on how the bodies were discovered. The suspects cooperated with police to prove their innocence but where accused instead. The case below also shows how evidence was

Fortunately, within the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution, the Fourth Amendment exists, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures (Gardner & Anderson, 2016). The Fourth Amendment gives citizens the right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects” (“Fourth Amendment,” n.d., n.p.). If this right is violated because law enforcement officers did not follow the correct procedure of obtaining a warrant that describes the person or items that will be seized, the search and seizure must be deemed unconstitutional (“Fourth Amendment,” n.d.). In the case of the defendant, it is evident that search and seizure misconduct of fellow officers occurred that violated the constitutional rights of the

With all of the corruption occurring in the United States judicial system one would think that the police would have caught onto it by now. Contrary to belief the police are not out there fighting against the injustices of the country; half the time they are behind all of it. A criminal complaint cannot be brought against a lawyer unless approved by a magistrate or other public official approves of prosecuting your accusations (Sachs). This can be attempted but most have no interest in going after lawyers or judges and they will simply hand your evidence (that clearly shows injustice) back to you. The lawyers, the judges and the police have a “mutual backscratching” set up to where all three have immunity to getting caught because they are all wiping away each other’s shoeprints, and

Out of the 4 boys there were 2 of the boys that were handcuffed or had to be escorted by the Sheriff in their Detention uniforms. The first kid was an older Hispanic teen who had been arrested for Domestic Violence on his girlfriend and was also being charged with child neglect has he did this in front of their child. The Defendants mother, sister and even his girlfriend who he got the charge for, were all in attendance hoping to see him be released out of the Counties custody and go home. Unfortunately, this did not happen and the family was very upset and in tears after the teen had to be escorted out of the courtroom once he was able to give his mother a hug. The next proceeding was a very young African American boy. He couldn’t have had to not be any more than 11 years old. He did not have any family in attendance and was being represented by a GAL who was trying to find proper placement for him when it came to his behavior. Other than the center he was being held in already he had nowhere else to go and could not be released

I attended the District Court at 201 West Picacho Ave on March 7, 2011. I sat in on judge Mike Murphy's court. Judge Murphy started court promptly at 9:00 a.m. but before I got into the court I had to wait in a long line of about 30 people. then when I finally got to the court house door I had to go through a metal detector where I had to take off my belt and shoes and everything metal on my persons. Then I asked one of the officers working the metal dictator how I could ask to sit in on a criminal court that was going on this morning. She then directed me to court room four. I asked the bailiff if it was ok for me to sit in on court today for my criminal justice class, and if the case where criminal matters. The bailiff then told me that