The Men We Carry in Our Minds Analysis Essay

As smith is addressing the male bias in the in the sociology department in reference to the participation of women in the field, she addressed that fact that most women who are in the field of academic and running a house hold fell this “Bifurcation of conciseness”. She defines this as the two different “people” that women are. This is the experience of the world they actually experience and in the dominant view of which

Sanders’ essay is organized around making the aforementioned distinctions: men and women, toilers and warriors, rich and poor. It’s an innate human tendency to want to label the things we see and experience. Separating and labeling our world helps us in making important decisions, organizing our thoughts, and interacting with our environment. Sanders’ labels, although important for constructing a clear argument, are problematic. They are not completely incorrect, but they should be seen as a tool for discussion alone, and not as the ultimate truth about our

Peoples’ differing views on feminism is cause for constant debate, as shown by Scott Russell Sanders, in his essay The Men We Carry in Our Minds. He brings a rather different, but accurate view point to the feminism debate. His perspective is not one that is overheard; instead it brings a new fresh idea and argument to the debate. He describes a man’s point of view, but not just any man’s view, one that witnessed and was around men that had jobs at steel mills, or a coal mines. The men that had the jobs that no one wanted, but were forced to work because they needed to make money so they could support their family.

For a long time, men and women have been dealing with the controversy of gender roles. In modern day, the battle for gender equality has been more known. In the story “Guys Suffer from Oppressive Gender Roles Too”, the author Julie Zeilinger explains how males are held to a more macho standard, but do have prevalent emotions. If we were to let go of these rigid rules about what is manly, there would be no standard for any gender. If that was reality, men shouldn’t have to feel humiliated about staying home, and if their companion makes more money than they do. Zeilinger talks about how males detach themselves from some emotions, and live a “life nub to a true range of human emotion” so they can meet this masculinity standard. However if males

From the beginning of the story, we are shown racial inequalities. Ellison introduces us to our character who is a broke and hungry African American economically struggling to save his lady friend’s, Laura’s, life. The protagonist “got no birth certificate to

After reading this essay, the section that made the most impact on me was section seven. In section seven, Sanders reveals the feelings of a heartfelt boy who is under the guilt of his alcoholic father. He claims he, the boy, is the reason his father would drink. He would become possessed by the demons that his son brought him because he was not “perfect”. The reason this section is so important to me is because of how young and heartbroken he was to deal with the consequences of his father. His choice of words, the way he describes how he felt towards his father, is so utterly influential to become someone your children look up to. I believe children should look up and respect their parents rather than fear them of who they are.

Such a movement involved the American women to band together, raising an awareness of protecting women in pay, position, and anti-discrimination laws, which became as powerful as a women elevating herself to the arena of a soap box (Tavaana, “The 1960s-70s American Feminist Movement”). In the brief age of revolution, the nation also began to see the importance of women studies in high education institutions (Elfman, “A ‘Second Wave of Feminism’”). In the text, Rich divulges in her views on civil rights, emphasizing on her bias view on women suffrage in education, but rationalizes it with social currency: “...You, the women students here, and… us, who teach in a women’s college [are two parts of education]. But ultimately those two parts are indivisible… Less than a decade ago, with the rebirth of a feminist movement in this country, women students and teachers in a number of universities began to demand and set up women’s studies courses – to claim a women-directed education (Rich, 220, 221).” Whether it was intentional or not, Rich’s use of the word “indivisible” when describing the bond of female student and teachers (with no gender specific aim), was utterly relevant to say the least. Any US citizen hearing the speech, then and now, could recognize the correlation of the verbiage used in “Claiming an Education” as well as in the official Pledge of Allegiance. Rich was calling attention to not only the participation of national academia

In his favor however, it is helpful to note that “…whiteness is not really a color at all, but a set of power relations.” Here, Mills acknowledges that race is more than a war on skin tones; it is the unequal distribution of power amongst two groups divided by one physical characteristic. The labels black and white are simplistic. However, by using this simple definition of Whiteness, black men would fall into that category with respect to black women. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013), black men earned nearly 20% more than women (relative to one another). This unequal distribution of wealth in society is symbolic of the unequal distribution of power in the same society. This unequal distribution in the text is not presented as a major concern. Mills refers to white women as philosophers (2) while black women are written here as wanting to adhere to beauty standards (52). Women also had to overcome “hegemonic classes”, not just blacks. This parallel of having to overcome an obstacle set by oppressors should be presented, especially since it leads to an unequal distribution of power and that is what the text addresses.

We have always learned about men. Throughout our years in the K-12 school systems we, as students, have learned about the contributions that men have made to the development of our country. We learn from a young age that we live in a patriarchal society, in which boys are stronger than girls and fathers should be the head of the household. The idea is pressed upon us that it is unusual for our mothers to make more money than our fathers and that women will always and should always be the secretary to a man’s CEO. In Mark Twain’s Pudd’nhead Wilson, Twain reflects on the way of life in 1894. The way he speaks of women satirically and stereotypically gives us a clear outlook on what was thought of women of that time period as well as Twain’s own perspective. He makes the argument that they were only good for two things: raising babies and housekeeping.

Margaret Wente’s July 2015 Globe and Mail article, “What Women Can Learn From Men” addresses a common phenomenon, the comparison: between men and women. With her article, she hopes to advise women on how they can improve themselves and their lives with simple changes. Furthermore, she wisely chooses to avoid a sexist approach by commending men on their behavioral traits despite her gender. Infact, using logical implications, she portrayed herself as an example rather than offend her audience. Additionally, through evidence, figures, facts and a link, she skillfully supports her theories thus making her article significantly factual and effective. Although Margaret starts by stereotypically generalising men, she depicts some of their great qualities that women can truly learn from. Using different approaches, she portrays women and their thoughts then skillfully explains how they can better themselves by “thinking” like men. Despite how she initially condemned men, she concludes by logically beseeching that man-shaming “has gone far enough” and should stop.

These rules foster a certain type of man. One who takes charge and leads, one whose primary concern is, “Being a Man Among Men,” (Kimmel 464). However, it also creates a person who suppresses his feelings in fear of being labeled as effeminate. The stigma dictates that attributes typically associated with women are unmasculine, so as boys turn to men, “Along the way they suppress all the feelings they associate with the maternal--compassion, nurturance, vulnerability, dependency,” (Kimmel 469). This pattern of suppression has not changed much in recent years. Society still enforces the idea that men should be strong and stoic, when these traits are no longer what are needed to be successful in the workforce.

The intended audience for Hook’s article was a wide range of people. The text suggests aims at those who grew up in patriarchal households and suffered because of it, as well as those who grew up in a very accepting household yet were criticized outside their home for not conforming to patriarchal gender roles. Hooks mentions that men who grew up in significantly patriarchal households and

Loyalty is a casualty of the Gaddafi regime in In the Country of Men. Discuss.

Hisham Matar’s narrative solely revolves around the perspective of a nine year-old boy Sulieman El Dewani, experiencing first hand an important time of Libya’s history. This crucial time in history was in Gidafi’s oppressive regime in 1979. In the text, In the Country of Men, family bonds within the Libyan society are somewhat the strongest though other relationships between the oppressed citizens of Libya and their totalitarian country and the relationship friends have with each other do prevail to be just as solid. The family bonds within this patriarchy society heavily display a sense of intimate love and compassion for one another. This relationship is deeply

Warren Farrell was born in 1943 and grew into an American educator, and author of seven books on men's and women's issues. In the 60’s he started his research on gender issues and mostly focused on the feminist perspective, but by the 80’s he thought that men were being misrepresented. Into the 90’s this feeling began to grow and although his book Why Men are the way They Are (published in the 80’s) was an award-winning best seller, he published The Myth of Male Power to confront the misinterpretations of men. He is the only man to have been elected three times to the national organization for women New York Governing Council and his books are published in more than 50 countries and in 15 languages. Farrell’s other book, Why Men Earn More: the Startling Truth behind the Pay Gap - and What Women can Do about it has been selected by U.S. News and World Report in 2006 as one of the finest four books on careers. Warren has appeared on over 1000 TV and radio shows, and been interviewed frequently by Oprah and Barbara, and by Larry King and Peter Jennings. Farrell has said that despite all his accomplishments “his best moments are at home” in Mill Valley, California with his wife Liz, and two daughters.