The Civil War
The Civil War is deemed to be one of the bloodiest wars in American history. However, the Civil War had seemingly been a long time coming. There were many events that took place within the fifteen years prior to the Civil War that surely foreshadowed the ultimate secession of the “cotton states” from the Union. Evidently, the end of the Mexican-American War in 1848 leading to the Compromise of 1850, the publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott Decision of 1857, John Brown’s raid in 1859, and the outcome of the Presidential Election of 1860 helped contribute to southern secession. These sectional conflicts left the United States on the brink of a Civil War. These major issues urged
…show more content…
In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act formed both the Kansas and Nebraska territories. Giving the people a chance to spread slavery towards the Midwest. Pinpointing all of the attention on Kansas whom potentially was the leading factor in altering the balance between the North and the South. With all the unnecessary focus on Kansas, chaotic disruptions and outbursts began to rise described as, “The territory we know as Kansas was better known as ‘Bleeding Kansas’ due to all the violent clashes between the pro- and anti-slavery parties.” Consequently, the act prorated the nation and directed it towards the Civil War. Eventually, the act itself nullified both Compromises of 1820 and 1850. The inevitable turmoil over the act caused a split amongst both the Democrats and the Know-Nothings party, causing the rise of the Republican Party. With that, they managed to effectively split the United States into two major parties; the Republicans in the North and the Democrats in the …show more content…
In the series of seven debates that took place all over the state of Illinois between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln tensions began to rise amongst the union. In a pursuit to be elected into the Senate, Douglas and Lincoln expressed their strong beliefs and outlooks on critical issues during the debates. For instance, one of the nationally significant topics discussed was slavery, which eventually became a major election issue. After the 1857 Dred Scott Case that stated neither Congress nor the people had the right to pass laws to keep slavery out of any U.S. territory. Leading the complexion of slavery in territories to become a major election issue. During this time, Douglas was the leading enthusiast of the "popular sovereignty" concept. According to which the citizens of a territory would have the right to vote on whether the territory would be a free or slave state. Meanwhile, Republicans such as Abraham Lincoln continued to hold onto the idea that Congress should have a say in a territories decision. Lincoln strongly stood with the concept of Congress voting to ‘prevent the expansion of slavery into the territories, while leaving it alone in states where it existed’ clinging on to the hope that those states in time would decide to end slavery themselves. Similarly stating “I have my mind very distinctly made up. I should be exceedingly glad to see slavery abolished in the District of
The Mexican American War was a very controversial event. The Americans believed in their “Manifest Destiny” which prompted them to annex the territory of Texas which, in turn, initiated the war on April 25, 1846. Texas was annexed to the Union as a slave state on December 29, 1845. This upset all of the Free states along with the Mexicans but the Southerners were in favor of the war because it gave them more strength when fighting for slavery. While there were many different beliefs about the Mexican-American War throughout the United States, these beliefs generally were the same within a region.
After the bill was passed, pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters rushed in to settle in Kansas to affect the outcome of the first election. Pro-slavery settlers won the election, but were charged with fraud by anti-slavery settlers. The anti-slavery settlers held another election, but the pro-slavery settlers refused to vote. This resulted in two opposing legislatures within the Kansas territory. The opposition created violence between the two groups, causing many bloody battles that greatly increased the death rate, giving Kansas the nickname “Bleeding Kansas”. President Pierce, supporting pro-slavery, sent in Federal troops to stop the violence and disperse the anti-slavery legislature. Another election was held and pro-slavery supporters won. They were again charged with election fraud. As a result, Congress did not recognize the constitution the pro-slavery settlers adopted, and Kansas wasn’t allowed to become a state. Eventually,
“The United States had emerged as a modern capitalist nation, and the spirit of nationalism in the country was strong and growing” (Henderson 71). As tensions grew between the Unites States and Mexico, there was a thirst for war. The Unites States declared war with Mexico, because they owned land that Americans desired, resulting in America’s fulfillment of achieving their philosophy of “Manifest Destiny”. The blood boil of both countries caused a lot of bloodshed. The dispute lasted for a long two year battle which was for huge amounts of land. The Americans were victorious and claimed new territories from the conflict.
More than any other event, the American Civil War went far in defining a United States that had been imperfectly and incompletely shaped by its first 70 years. For seven decades, the presence of slavery in a republic founded on principles of human freedom increasingly confused the political system and unraveled the social fabric. (Heidler, David S. and Jeanne T. Heidler. (2015)). Although slavery in the South had given rise to antislavery movements in the North as early as the American Revolution, a fresh vigor characterized the abolition movement in the 1830s. Arguments over the western territories clouded the country into a series of disruptive crises. Each was settled with an unsatisfying compromise that left most Southerners feeling materially cheated and many Northerners morally embarrassed. (Heidler, David S. and Jeanne T. Heidler. (2015)). Efforts to organize the Midwest region called the Nebraska Territory in 1854, led to the ill-conceived Kansas-Nebraska Act. It was yet another attempt designed to secure Southern support for the organization of what by prior agreement would have been a free territory. Kansas and Nebraska were created from the region under the principal of popular sovereignty, which was to say that each territory would decide for itself whether to admit or prohibit slavery. (Heidler, David S. and Jeanne T. Heidler. (2015)). That plan
Kansas-Nebraska Act – divided one territory into two to keep the slave balance equal; it immediately destroyed the Whig party, divided the democrats, and parties who opposed the bill came to form the Republican Party
Throughout American History, started from Jamestown Americans started to settle upon Native American land by wiping them out or forcing them to move west. By 1846 throughout 1848, Americans approach Mexican territory’s land which they were eager to conquer and Manifest Density that was unstoppable and a goal for the United States. The conflict was the Mexicans weren 't going to give up their land because of a selfish belief and were provoked to go to war against a stronger nation. A war broke out known as the Mexican-American War.
When the American Civil War began in the spring of 1861, those flocking to enlistment stations in states both north and south chiefly defined their cause as one of preservation. From Maine to Minnesota, young men joined up to preserve the Union. From Virginia to Texas, their future foes on the battlefield enlisted to preserve a social order, a social order at its core built on the institution of slavery and racial superiority . Secession had not been framed by prominent Southerners like Robert Toombs as a defensive measure to retain the fruits of the revolution against King George, a fight against those who sought to “intrique insurrection with all its nameless horrors.” (Toombs Speech) On January 1, 1863, when Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation went into effect the war became a revolution. The Union, the soldiers in blue fought to preserve could no longer exist. On every mile of soil, they would return to the Stars and Stripes from that moment on, the fabric of society would be irrevocably changed. In May of 1865, with the abolition of slavery engrained into the Constitution with the passage of the 13th Amendment, the Confederate armies of Lee and Johnston disbanded, and Lincoln dead of an assassin’s bullet; this change was the only certainty the torn fabric of the newly reunited states was left to be resown. Andrew Johnson and Southern Democrats believed the revolution of 1863 had gone far enough. Radical Republicans and African-Americans sought instead to bring it to
Did you know that in the Mexican-American War, the US took half of Mexico 's land? After Mexico 's independence from Spain in 1821, the northern lands of Mexico were rarely used. America saw this as an opportunity to expand by seizing Mexico’s northern lands, and took it. They accepted Mexico 's offer to live in Texas, and soon Texas became overrun with Americans. They influenced Texas to go against Mexico, and eventually Texas was won by the US in battle. After that, Mexico and America began having disputes. However, the Mexican-American War officially started when Mexican troops shot American soldiers in the disputed territory. In modern-day, many people take sides about whether it was right or not for America to declare war upon Mexico. In various forms, one of the most controversial questions is, "Did the US have good reasons for starting war with Mexico?". The United States were not justified because they were greedy for land, broke Mexican laws that they agreed to while in Mexico, and created faulty reasons for their actions.
A leading example of the struggles of slavery in the western states was the struggle over slavery in Kansas. Document F depicts a political cartoon basically stating that Stephen Douglas, Franklin Pierce, and James Buchanan all attempted intentionally or unintentionally to spread slavery to the West. Stephen Douglas proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in which the Midwest Nebraska territory would be divided into two states Kansas and Nebraska and the issue of slavery would be determined by in state vote known as "popular sovereignty". Franklin Pierce aided with the signing of the bill. The results upon this bill was harsh fighting between pro-slavery supporters and non-slavery supporters in Kansas over this issue. It also led to the non-reelection of Pierce and the end to the Whig party, along with the introduction of the sectional Republican party, who opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act. An attempt at forcing slavery into
At the insistence of Southern leaders, he made clear that his bill would render the Missouri compromise inoperative and void. Furthermore, the bill, as amended divided the region into two distinct territories. Douglas miscalculated grievously. He thought that reopening the slavery question would be a minor matter, even though he opposed slavery."(Morrison pg. 586) Morrison shows in this statement that raising the issue of slavery once again was no big thing for Douglas. He disregarded his beliefs over issues of slavery to get his billed passed. Theirs evidence of Douglas interest to obtain southern support even on Basset's Short History of The United States. "[Douglas] favored a new territory in the region through which the proposed Pacific road would run, and he may have adopted Atchison's idea because he saw it was the only way to get the support of the southerners."(Basset pg.487)
In the book Voices of Freedom written by Eric Foner it quotes a document written by a man named John O'Sullivan. O'Sullivan writing for the Democratic review in the summer of 1845 wrote an article titled "Annexation". The article was written ten year after Texas declared independence from Mexico. There was a push from many Americans to annex Texas. Congress voted on annexation and the majority voted towards annexation. Although it was voted upon in Congress, they did not go ahead with annexation due to fears of another slave state and the chance of war with Mexico. There were many Americans that were against annexation. O'Sullivan
The political effects of the Kansas-Nebraska Act were colossal. Before the act’s passage, the Whig party had been one of the largest political parties in America, consisting of both Southern and Northern Whigs. The Kansas-Nebraska Act initially violated the Missouri Compromise of 1820, an unceasing pact that had been strongly supported by both the North and South. The ratification of the bill conclusively split the Whig party into two; almost every Southern Whig had
When Texas gained independence from Mexico in 1836, the United States had decided not to annex Texas after Mexico had threatened war. However, despite Mexico’s threats, in 1844 President James K. Polk decided to re-annex Texas. During this time he had also wanted to purchase California, New Mexico, and the rest of the U.S. Southwest, but was rejected. In 1846, after the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma, Congress declared war on Mexico. This was the beginning of the Mexican-American war. The war continued for two years, until finally it ended on February 2nd, 1848 when the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed. Through this, the U.S. gained 525,000 square miles of land from Mexico in exchange for 15 million dollars. The Mexican Cession
The war with Mexico is long remembered as an episode, and by no means is it an unimportant one. With the events that led up to its happening, from the Manifest Destiny to the disputes on territory, it has severely marked the United States. American historians regard the Mexican-American war as “the foulest blot on our national honor”. (sfmuseum.org) Unethical actions were taken gain Mexican territory. Polk and his hunger for land drove him to find some devious way to fight a war with Mexico. His belligerent attitude in regard to this war was the “foulest blot on our national honor.” However, as one studies the events that led to it, was it an unprovoked act of aggression? Or did the US unjustifiably lure Mexico into one of the bloodiest wars on American soil?
During the 1850s, slavery had become a topic of great discussion, especially when it came to the organization of new territories, and whether slavery should be allowed or prohibited in these new territories. Some argued that slavery was right, while others though it was not and should be ended, causing fear and anger between the free-states in the North and the Southern Slave states. This would lead to many problems for the nation. These problems not only created a division between the northern and southern states, it caused blood to be spilled and led to beginning of the American Civil War. Within these events, four significant ones created the spark needed to start the Civil War. These events were the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854, Bleeding Kansas, Harper’s Ferry Raid, and the Secession of the South from the Union, which created a division between northern and southern states and made the American Civil War inevitable.