preview

The Mexican Revolution: Anticlericalism

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Mexican revolution (1910-1920) was defined by a violent and unrelenting anticlericalism. In 1900 it was estimated that an overwhelming 99.3% of Mexicans were practising Catholics. For Mexico to go through such a sustained period of anticlericalism yet remain such a religious nation, there were several predominant factors which contributed to such wide and violent attacks on the Church. In the following essay, I will analyse the Huerta coup in 1913 as a watershed moment at the start of the anticlerical campaigns. Moreover, the revolution per Mary Kay Vaughan was a patriarchal event , anticlericalism can be seen as a Machista reaction to the threat of the Church on the traditional structure of the family. The study of Jalisco highlights the political power struggle between Church and State. Though comparing the State under Manuel M. Diéguez and José Guadalupe Zuno there are clear motives for anticlericalism, described by Robert Curley as institutional strategic and political tactical. Finally, the influence of the freemasons in discrediting the clergy and generating popular support for anticlericalism cannot be ignored. State-Masonic relations were denounced …show more content…

Under Francisco Madero there was little evidence of popular anticlericalism like, which would follow the Huerta coup. In fact, Madero welcomed the Catholic political mobilisation. The Coup in February 1913 would serve as a catalyst for the anti-Church sentiment that had been growing for many years before the revolution. The Church was widely regarded as having strong ties to conservative organisations. Mathew Butler believed conservatism prefers order, stability and a rigid hierarchy, with the protection of property. Madero had failed to restore order in revolutionary Mexico, the state was weak and had not repressed rebellion or protected the respected social order established under Porfirio

Get Access