The Misconceptualization Of The Nature Of Emotion

Bushman conducted three studies to test his hypothesis that “high trait aggressive individuals are more affected by violent social media than that of low trait aggression.” (Bushman. Web. 1995). These three studies were conducted empirically with 420 psychology students. Study one gave the students a film description, and then they chose of which to view. These films have not been shown in theaters or televised. They were given scores on the “Physical Aggression subscale,” which results from a questionnaire testing verbal and physical aggression, anger and hostility.  (Bushman. Web. 1995). The participants with high trait aggression were more likely to watch violence than the opposed. Study two, “participants reported their mood before and

This paper will examine Robert C. Solomon's Emotions and Choices article, to best identify what anger is, and to what extent a rational human being is responsible for their anger. Firstly, Solomon's argument must be described. A quick summation of Solomon's argument can be found in the following four points: Emotions are judgements, emotions are chosen, emotions serve a purpose, and emotions are rational.1 To quote Solomon, he explains that “Emotions are not occurrences, and do not happen to us. They ... may be chosen like an action.”2

Anger is often a difficult emotion to express and understand and it has come to be recognized as a significant social problem that our society facing today. This paper discusses the efficacy of the Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and the Emotion-focused therapy (EFT) for treating patient with anger problems and compared therapists’ view on emotion which how they see emotion as the prime mover in human experience in different ways respectively. Besides, the development, overview and the similarities of CBT & EFT has been critically compared and discussed in this essay. CBT and EFT conceptualize emotional problems differently and employ different techniques in each therapy. Although the CBT and EFT possess many distinct

Anger in a business setting can cause one to act inappropriately or unwisely by blowing an incident out of proportion and possibly irrevocably damaging a career. Learning that at any moment we have the ability to consciously control our anger is empowering but not that easy to accomplish. Goleman asserts the body’s chemical reaction to stressful situations, relating back to our ancient ancestors, is the reason for this difficulty. The introduction of hormones into the body is not a gradual elevation, but a quick release relating back to our basic fight or flight response to environmental dangers. Every day, hormones are incrementally released into the body with each passing taxing stressful episode until a level is reached that triggers anger. He offers two weapons against anger outbursts. The first is method is to recognize, as early as possible, what is triggering the anger. This disruption of the anger

In order to direct one’s thinking they need negative emotions. The article “Happiness: Enough Already” declares that, “Studies show that when you are in a negative mood,” says Diener, “you become more analytical, more critical and more innovative” (Begley 456). Which proves that the happier one is the more absent minded they are; whereas when one is negative one is more likely to think before doing. According to “Don’t Worry, Be Gloomy” it states, “When we’re overly cheerful, we tend to neglect important threats and dangers” (David 124). There is something called being “too happy” meaning one experiences extreme levels of happiness and when one has these extreme levels that person tends to take riskier actions that would harm themselves or others. As the article continues it states, “Our so-called negative emotions encourage slower, more systematic cognitive processing” (David 124). Meaning that one would acknowledge and recall the more important details instead of following the interpretations and judgments of a situation from others. Therefore, the negative emotions actually help people get through their situations or life in general.

Although many books have been written about communication and connection in relationships, there has been a book that addresses precisely this wonderful process as has James C. Petersen in his book: Why Don’t We Listen Better? And it is precisely the way in which the parts he divided the book that takes the reader to a better understanding of what the personal relationships connections through communications are concerned.

Even though hypothesis that TA and UR are negatively correlated is not supported, one thing to note is that the correlation is positive, not negative as expected. Disgust and anger differ by their causes. Disgust is a response when a social harm is violated, usually body usage (Russell 2011), while moral anger occurs with unfair responsibilities. In general, negative moods induced UR when protagonist is pushed in to active decision frame. (Pastötter 2012). One cause of the differing results is that while anger motivates hostile aggression, it does not drive aggressive actions (Butcher, Spielberger 2003). Despite being a negative emotion, anger gives positive feedback of one’s position (Clore 2007). Hence it gives confidence towards one’s immediate stance, which is given by one’s moral intuition, motivating them to make a utilitarian response, to correct the situation to their satisfaction. In the dilemmas used here, anger is varied by one’s intentionality (Pascale 2011), which varies in different perspective of situation in PMD, whether is it anger at the large man, resulting in an unsupported correlation. This leaves an area of study regarding relation of anger and dilemma, with anger being reliant on one’s intentionality. On the other hand, disgust induces aversion. Participants tend to avoid the option of having to initiate harm onto others, as it

Fear can be “generated by potentially dangerous ideas and examines the way such powerful mass emotions can cloud human judgment [1]”.

Levy & Mineka (1998) found no evidence to suggest that high anxious individuals recalled more memories to threat words than low anxious individuals, nor that they recalled memories to threat words more quickly. Additionally, high anxious individuals did not recall threatening cue words more than low anxious individuals during the free recall test. Levy & Mineka (1998) concluded that their paradigm was sensitive to outside memory effects. The emotions group recalled more cue words than the facts group, supporting depth of processing theory. However, expressing emotions did not interact with the anxiety variable to affect any mood-congruent memory

Expected Consequences of Anger-Related Behaviours has been investigated by far not scientifically proven. Though the evidence happen to be comprehensible. The statement of the behaviors outcome is expectancy, in which a person's belief that a particular behavior will result in a specific type of outcome.

Lerner, Gonzalez, Small and Fischhoff (2003) undertook an experiment to study the effects of fear and anger on perceived threats of terrorism. The design of the experiment was a national field study. To acquire a nationally representative sample of American’s, the researchers drew a random sample of 1786 people, aged 13-88, from Knowledge Networks nationally representative panel.

If anyone knows another language, or if English is your second language, please write briefly how you think and feel about language as a vehicle to understanding the nuances of a culture. If English is your only language, just please respond to what others might have said.

Chapter 1 explains the work of a Harvard psychologist named William James. William published the article “What is an Emotion?” in a philosophical journal entitled Mind in 1884. His paper is an argument for the primacy and necessity of bodily systems in producing emotional feelings. James-Lange theory states that physiological arousal instigates the experience of emotion. A Harvard physiologist, Walter Cannon, roundly criticized James’ theory, claiming that, according to the Cannon Bard theory, physiological changes follow emotional expression.

In the next paragraphs I will consider some theories, factors and evidence on cognitive controlling of emotion in terms of

For many people, they live their lives based on emotions. Emotions of happiness, love, success, and many more, could possibly be the most satisfying feelings. Except we commonly experience unpleasant emotions. There are emotions of anger, hatred, sadness, and disgrace. A very important question in the understanding of the human mind and highly related to cognitive science, is how do these emotions affect human cognition and the impact on our abilities to be rational? To tackle this question, we need to understand what emotions are, but not solely in the manner we are all familiar with, we need to understand them from a cognitive nature involving our physiology, psychology, and environment. Cognition, according to the Oxford definition