The Misunderstanding of Humans Relationship with Nature Essay

The introduction of long-term refrigeration and innovative sanitary procedures allowed meat to be processed, packaged, and shipped anywhere, eliminating the need for a local butcher. Concentrated numbers of chickens and hens were made possible through the cultivation and development of Vitamin D a few years later. Off-season production and incubation were now possible without the need for sunlight. Scientific advancements in breeding continued to increase the efficiency of these facilities. No practice was left untouched as the cages themselves became modified for maximum profit. Single-bird cages would hold two or three birds and the vertical integration of cages became popular. (Intensive Animal Farming 2016) Within the span of forty years, chickens went from a family farm of 1,500 to factory facilities containing up to 125,000. (Clean Water Act Requirements,

Human beings are part of the animal kingdom, and therefore part of nature. If that is true, then everything they create or destroy is by default "natural". I agree with the statement.

The nature of man is violent. Initially blood was spilt out of necessity, for survival. The primitive world was kill or be killed, and Homo Sapiens were able to come down from their trees and out of their caves because they found ways to kill efficiently. This bloodlust makes us unique and gave us an advantage over our meeker cousins, as the human race endured while Homo Erectus and the Neanderthals went extinct, fading into the ether of history. However, very quickly man ran out of prey, ran out of things to kill, and as a result turned their arrows, spears, swords, and later guns on one another. Peter O’Toole said it best as the titular character of the classic film, Lawrence of Arabia, by stating that man was, “greedy, barbarous, and cruel,” mirroring the beliefs of Thomas Hobbes and his concept of man’s State of Nature.

The Earth is getting to be drastically over populated and at the rate we're going we will hit some major limiting factors with in 30 years. There has been a decline of death rates because people are living longer so we are not dropping out like we used to. Better medical facilities and stuff causes people to again live longer and add to the population. Because there are more people and more demand there are less natural resources which is bad. The environment is degrading because more people more pollution. More conflicts and war.]

Now that there is sun, sky, dry land, vegetation, day and night, God goes to work creating what we today would refer to as living creatures. On day 5 God creates living creatures in the water and winged birds to fill the sky (Genesis 1:20-23). Then on day 6 God creates livestock, creatures that crawl, and all wildlife (Genesis 1:24-25). It is also day 6 of creation when God says “let us create man in Our image according to Our Likeness” (Genesis 1:26, HCSB). The words “Us” and “Our” brings to the forefront the Triune God, living in perfect harmony as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The ordering of God’s creation is perfect to not only give us humans the most beautiful playground ever imagined, it is also well thought out, orderly, and made perfectly to sustain

In the movie Food Inc. it shows you how the farmers really raise your food. The way the chickens live are not right. Some chicken houses have windows, some don't and the chickens are all shoved into them with barely any room. Some farmers don't think it's right but they can't change it because farmers no longer control the birds and the companies such as Tyson control the birds from the time there dropped off until the time there slaughtered. The companies

Ethical restoration has been a controversial topic in environmental ethics over the last couple of decades. Its premise is simple, rebuild or relocate ecosystems that have been destroyed by human development. Many believe it is paramount to build a connection between humans and nature, but there are others who argue its just another form of anthropocentric behavior. Eric Katz rejects ethical restoration in his piece, “The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature”. He argues ethical restoration is just another artifact created by humans. When humans create an ecosystem, they really mean to control it and therefore dominate the environment. I argue against this point. Humans are actually just modifying their surroundings like every other natural entity, and while it appears to be domination, it actually is not. My paper will be split between two views, first I will give the view of Katz in his paper, then I will give my critique, then a possible counter argument of his, and finally my counter argument. Ethical restoration can not be considered morally wrong because it is a natural phenomena for humans to affect their nature and it is helpful to the environment.

How people’s views of nature have changed over time in the United States of America and how it has affected us is a great question. Looking back through history makes it simple to answer this question. People have very different opinions on to what their answer would be. Reading Out of the Woods edited by Char Miller and Hal Rothman, Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s by Donald Worstter, Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West by William Cronon, The Ecological Indian by Shepard Krech III, and Something's Rising: Appalachians Fighting Mountaintop Removal by Silas House makes it easy to comprehend and to answer how our views of nature have changed.

Throughout the whole chapter of Genesis, it tells a story of how God created the earth and the creatures of the world. Genesis also goes out of the way to describe how God created the earth with love and care, and showed us how God wants us to treat the earth. Reading the text of the Bible may allow believers to believe that God calls us to be good stewards to the earth.

The increase of human population has caused many problems to the environment and the ecosystem. These problems include pollution, taking up land and draining resources such as food. Environment apocalyptic, which is a branch of ecocriticism, believes that one cause of death for humans is the collapsing of the environment due to overpopulation. Literary theorist Malthus states that “population would increase to the point that misery and vice halt it” (Garrard, 2012).

The world is frequently changing. With an increase in technology, and populations there is a need for more resources. The competition of resources could potentially deplete the natural resources over time unless it is continually restored. This has however, become a pretty arduous task with factors such as global warming coming into play. Global warming has especially played a pretty crucial role in the rising of sea levels and even the extreme temperature changes. Over time, these changes could presumably get worse affecting the populations they entail.

made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on

Whether human beings are instinctually good or evil in an elementary natural state is a question that has been boggling the minds of even the greatest philosophers. There is a spectrum of theories that support both good and evil within the human race, each with valid points that explains the range of our interests, being either for ourselves or for others. However, my personal stance is the sensible theory of Altruism. Past experiences and observations allow me to take the stance, and support the argument that humans are caring and genuinely good individuals and have the will and desire to help those around them.

At one point in time God mandated man and animal to eat solely from the earth. Perhaps in one of the western world’s oldest and most influential and powerful texts, there was reasoning for the implied notion of equality. He creates man and woman at a synchronized point in time, on the same day he creates all other earthly creatures again at the same time. He gives the same instructions and blessings to animals as he does to man and woman he says, “God blessed them saying, be fruitful and multiply”(Genesis, 1:22, 28). He also instructs both man and animal that the earth is a food source for all. The text implies that animal and human are created and instructed in an analogous fashion, as equal inhabitants of the earth, similar to the ideal against speciesism, that all of God’s creatures or earth inhabitants desire the equal right to life.

Aristoteles “Poetics” appears to be a straight forward piece about what defines good and bad poetry. Throughout the work, he explains the minuet features of tragedy, epics, and representation that have naturally come to be the best. He even goes to great lengths to list out each of the features of these representations and the ways they can be implemented. Behind this seemingly simple idea, however there is the great implication of poetry as a naturally occurring representation and, therefore, good practice. Yet, natural does not appear to refer to our standard definition. The meaning goes beyond existing outside us to an almost Plato style of truth where one is waiting for the true form of the practice to revel itself. This complex evolution of nature and truth can be seen in comedy’s and tragedy’s origins, features, and reception.