The Morning Sun Case

In the case of Wong Sun v United States, in consideration of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine the Court excluded the admission of evidence in the trial court due to the violation of defendant’s Fourth Amendment Rights when the derivative evidence was obtained. Therefore, in this essay, I am going to discuss if the exclusion of evidence contributes in an important way of supporting the guarantees of the Fourth Amendment or should the derivative evidence be admitted because police officers could not have anticipated the discovery of derivative evidence.

Two days before Thanksgiving, Janet confronted James Cox, one of her students, who was caught plagiarizing. Because Janet was already feeling sexist attitudes from her students, James’

An article published by Thomas Bartlett “What Really Cost Chris Dussold His Dream Job?” Bartlett Tells the story of a college professor who saw his dream job devastated by rumors that spread through the hallways at Southern Illinois University in Evansville. Bartlett explains, the professor was fired for plagiarism. Dussold claims that was not the real reason to why he was fired. He believes it was a persistent rumor that he was sleeping with a undergraduate, a rumor proved to be false according to Mr. Dussold, Peyla, and university investigation. Now he’s on a mission to restore his reputation.

Although the superintendent has the authority to hire and fire teachers, it would be within his best interest to do so based on appropriate legal footing rather than personal bias. The superintendent’s recommendations for Barnhart’s change of employment appears to be grounded in bias. From the beginning he was a dubious supporter of Barnhart as athletic director. He has no proof that she contacted the reporter so is basing his decision on the weak legal footing of assumption. Understandably, he is doing so to balance teacher rights and promoting harmony within the work place which ultimately supports student learning. Several court cases provide guide lines for achieving this balance. The cases of Pickering v. Board of Education (1968) and Connick v. Myers (1983) developed a two pronged test to check the balance. First, does the speech address matters of public concern? Assuming Barnhart did contact the reporter, yes, the information is a matter of public concern since it involves Title IX, a federal civil law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in education activities. It is a federal law that high schools treat boys’ and girls’ sports equally. Also, can Burnhart demonstrate her speech interest outweigh the harmony of the district leadership? Again, yes, the speech is not affecting her immediate supervisor, principal Tara Hills as supported by Fales v. Garst

There are also negative aspects that could come from publishing this story before fact checking and interviewing all who were involved; for example, this story shines a negative light on the University of Virginia, current students, faculty, staff and even alumni. Using facts within the story of how the of head of the University’s Sexual Misconduct Board, Dean Nicole Eromo, handled the incident when Jackie finally decided to report it months

The meeting continued with board member Jason Hopp presenting Dr. Matthew Flannery, formerly the principal of Shiloh Hills Elementary School, for a roll call vote to approve him as the new Assistant Superintendent of the WIlson School District. Mr. Hopp spoke for approximately two minutes about the credentials, reputation, and record of quality performance that Dr. Flannery has documented during his time with the district. A five-year contract was approved on an 8-1 vote, with Mr. Martin voting “no”. It may be worth observing that Mr. Martin is known as the “no man” of the current board, and often tows one of the more conservative lines of all board members. One can speculate that he may have felt

You WOULD NOT want Charles Johnson to look into your background, not if you had anything to hide. He is an indefatigable investigator, who, at the campus conservative magazine, the Claremont Independent - and at his own rollicking blog -for four years kept Claremont McKenna College buzzing with revelations about affirmative action, politically tendentious speakers, and abuses in student government. He held college administrators ' feet to the fire, and they got singed. It was easier to condemn than to refute him, and his critics soon gave up on the latter. Outside CMC, more disinterested judges quickly discovered the boldness of his reporting and commentary. Soon he had been awarded virtually every prize a young journalist of conservative disposition could receive: the Robert L. Bartley Fellow­ ship at the Wall Street Journal, the Eric Breindel Award, the Robert Novak Award from the Phillips Foundation, and a Publius Fellowship at the Claremont Institute. Hitting the trifecta is hard, but what Charles achieved is so remarkable as to be nameless: hitting - what, the quadrifecta?

I have known Natalie Schieuer for almost half a year now, and in that time I have been incredibly pleased to meet such an amazing, talented, and brilliant young lady. I was Natalie’s counselor this summer at Nebraska Girls State. Girls State is a week-long camp, aimed towards education of state and local government. 400 of Nebraska’s top emerging high school juniors are chosen to attend this program, and within these numbers, Natalie still managed to shine through with her accomplishments and wit.

In this case, the Principal of Hazelwood east high, Principal Reynolds, reviewed the school paper before it was published. He thought two articles were inappropriate for school, one on some of the student’s pregnancies and experiences while pregnant, and one person’s experiences through her parent’s divorce. ("Facts and Case Summary: Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier."1 ) Even though all of the names were changed, the principal was worried that the students may be identified. Also, the father in the divorce article was not reached for comment, so the article had not been unbiased, as should be expected in a newspaper.("Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court: Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier"1) The principal removed these articles, causing the paper to miss a

It was perplexing time for The New York Times; a chapter, in their long-run, of fabrications that are now consider fabulists and egregious plagiarism. Hard News by Seth Mnookin, recounts the time a narcissistic and pedantic executive editor, named Howell Raines took took charged of the steering-wheel of one of the most reliable and prominent newspapers in the nation. It is described how Raines and other high-profiled and important figures for the paper, such as managing editor Gerald M. Boyd, dealt with the Jayson Blair’s scandal. The Jayson Blair scandal is about the terrible repercussions when plagiarism and fabulism is committed by a reporter. It not only tarnishes the reporter’s reputation but the newspaper’s transparency as a whole. I

Like when Gazette wrote a story on daily life at school This give inaccurate and incomplete knowledge of the event because it give a much light tension of the event when the tension were extremely high.Carlotta says “Much of it was based on rumors and factual inaccuracies including a teacher who reporter to her class that the nine of us would be leaving at Thanksgiving” (A Mighty Long Way, page 107).The meaning of what she is saying is that they gave an inaccurate picture of what the Little Rock Nine really were experiencing. Also She had the immediate feeling that everything was all worked out, when in reality this was an inaccurate understanding of the event; no agreement had actually been reached (A Mighty Long Way, page 78).When reporters and newspaper articles presented an incomplete or inaccurate of events, it left the public with a picture of events that could have led to false or misleading conclusions.

As the Smithville community works to advance the School District, Till does not have the moral compass needed to hold a school board position and represent the students, faculty and administration. Electing someone like Till would be a degression and misrepresentation to the goal of the Smithville School District which is to “build a tradition of excellence” and help students become “proactive, compassionate leaders”. For 13 years of our lives, we look up to adults and seek out mentors in all aspects of the District, whether it be faculty, administration or school board members. We should expect the utmost integrity, respect and commitment out of our community leaders as they try to instill in us, the students.

Christine Hoffman had an email go public in which she asked that all of the white students be put into the same class in a predominantly black school. After she had met with parents to try to alleviate some of the backlash from this incident, she was asked to be removed as principal and was transferred to district offices. While there was an investigation of her actions, she retired, and since she retired the investigation has been dropped. There has been joy coming from the St. Petersburg NAACP over the retirement of this woman, as well as from the parents of the affected children. While there were joyous reactions to the retirement, there was not any comment on if the schoolboard should have allowed her to retire with an ongoing investigation.

1. Consider Dunlap’s statement on page 3 of the case: “Stakeholders! Every time I hear the word, I ask how much did they pay for their stake? There is only one constituency I am concerned about and that is the shareholder primacy? Do you agree or disagree with Dunlap’s view of shareholder primacy? Explain

After reading the article, I can related to the boss. The boss did the correct decision of terminating Colvin. Colvin lie about having a family emergency and went to a Halloween party. For not being honest to his boss he did deserved to be terminated. I can related to this story. When I was a supervisor for an after school program I was responsible for 12 staff and 180 students. It was really difficult to have full staff. One day I had three teachers out because they had to attend a training. So, I was going to be out of ratio. One of the teachers decide to text me 30 minutes before her work schedule to inform me she will be out for the day due to a family emergency. I was okay with it and help the teachers out. As we were getting ready