The Most Dangerous Game Essay

Whenever a movie based on a book is produced, similarities must exist. It is crucial that there is correlation throughout the plot of both works in order for the story to be told. One example of a similarity between the plot of both versions of The Most Dangerous Game is that Rainsford and Zaroff were both experienced hunters. Zaroff had hunted all kinds of prey all over the world, and Rainsford was famous for his books on hunting. This made Zaroff’s hunt more enjoyable and Rainsford’s fight for his life more terrifying. Also, in both the movie and short story, Zaroff used dogs to hunt Rainsford. This illustrates that Zaroff did not exactly play fair in the story or the movie. Likewise, there are also major comparisons between the resolution of the literary work and the resolution of the motion picture. For example, in both endings, Rainsford was victorious. He was the first person to

Rainsford wakes up from his deep sleep in the comfortable bed he had worked for in the battle agaought to himself maybe the General wasnt so crazy after all and so Rainsford said is this what it takes to be the best hunter ? Rainsford immediately locks up the celled men again and Rainsford starts his game of his own . Rainsford declares his game and tells all of the men the rules and choices , either they play the game or they play the game there is no way escaping Rainsford you must play the game and survive or their other choice is to not play the game and most likely face death . He releases the men into the wilderness and the games begin . Rainsford realizes why general zaroff would play this game its because it gives you a rush

The Most Dangerous Game is about its theme of corruption and its plot events, something that differs from the story and movie. The main difference is the ending and theme of the original versus the adaptation. In the short story, it is unknown whether Rainsford takes on the role of the general after killing him out of spite and lust for revenge or gets off the island. This enforces the theme of the fact that man is corrupted when they are given great power or an enticing offer for said power. The movie, however, changes this and has Rainsford escape the island with Eve, a girl who was in Zaroff’s captivity. This changes the ending to where Rainsford kills Zaroff out of defense and to save another survivor, thus making him be a moral person. These endings change Rainsford as a character from a hunter corrupted by the savagery of Zaroff to a bold defender of

However, there is another motif that recurs in the “Most Dangerous Game” that deals with the elements of fear since fear has been mentioned throughout the entire story to describe what Rainsford feels. This “fear” motif can be used to describe how we, as humans, are afraid of something that might happen in the future or how we are frightened about things that may chase after us and endanger us. For instance, in the story, it describe the fear in Rainsford by stating, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.” This quote shows how Rainsford was afraid of General Zaroff chasing after him or scared of being hunted by him, which is similar to how we are afraid of being chased by our

The Most Dangerous Game was produced as a movie in 1932 and is very similar to the book published in 1924. Although the book and movie are very similar there are quite a few differences. I mean there was a shark attack and a big introduction scene on the boat but that wasn't in the book, but apart from that minor stuff there was one major difference between the book and movie. In the movie there is a woman named Eve with her brother on the island, this wasn't in the book. And it's not just the beginning of the movie the woman is in the plot almost for the whole movie! So this change kind of puts a twist on the story and makes the book and movie very different, mainly because the focus isn't just on Rainsford and General Zaroff, it's on Eve as well!

The story, “The Most Dangerous Game”, had many similarities and differences within the movie and book versions. Some of the similarities include the characters. The characters that are in both the movie and the story are Rainsford, Zaroff, and Ivan. In both, Rainsford is a hunter who came upon Ship-Trap Island by misfortune, Zaroff is a rich hunter who doesn’t hunt your ordinary game, and then there is Ivan who is like Zaroff’s bodyguard. Another similarity is Zaroff’s dogs. In both, Zaroff has dogs that help him hunt and guard his house. Also Zaroff’s best dog gets killed in both the movie and the story. One of the differences also include characters. In the movie there are two characters who aren’t in the book, Eve and her brother. In the

Secondly, in the movie version of The Most Dangerous Game, there is the addition of two characters, Eve and Martin Trowbridge. With the addition of these characters, the dialogue exchange between each character is different than the short story. These characters, specifically Eve, shows how much compassion each character has. Eve

will get whipped in the dungeon of Zaroff's home until he agrees to be hunted.

One theme embedded in “The Most Dangerous Game” is that all living things have feelings to survive. I know that this is an actual thing that is true with everyone, you see people survive from the things that you think are impossible there are people that get shot and drive themselves to hospitals. Animals that run when they are in danger, animals that fight for their lives either when forced to for crude human entertainment that is sicking, or when fighting or when fighting to protect their family. For example bears fight when they feel in danger they stand tall to make themselves seem bigger than who they are facing rather it be a human or another bear, they fight to protect their families the people that they love. You hear these amazing stories about dogs running into burning homes and save their owners, but yet people still think that animals have no ability to feel human feelings or the ability to survive. Another example for a dog is keeping the owners safe. When dogs bark at the ring of a doorbell or a knock at the door people usually just tell them to stop and be quiet, People don’t realize what they are actually doing from the dog barking he/she is letting you know that someone is at the door so that way you

When reading the story of the Most Dangerous Game, the main characters were Mr. Rainsford and General Zaroff. The setting of this story is a bright colored jungle, when reading the visualization is that of sunshine and animals. It seems like a very upbeat beautiful story about a hunter who incidentally fell off of his boat and swam to shore on this wonderful island. He was a great hunter believing that his prey didn’t have feelings of fear or anything of the sort. When he gets to the island he finds that there is civilization on the island. When reading further it gives the idea of an elegant giant home almost like in the movie Jumanji, with animal heads hung on the walls.

"The Most Dangerous Game", also published as "The Hounds of Zaroff", is a short story by Richard Connell, first published in Collier's book on January 19, 1924. The story features a big-game hunter from New York who falls off a yacht and swims to an isolated island in the Caribbean, where he is hunted by a Cossack aristocrat. The story is inspired by the big-game hunting safaris in Africa and South America that were particularly fashionable among wealthy Americans in the 1920s.

The differences between the story and the movie “Most Dangerous Game” are that the characters were different.. The setting was also different and everything was explained. In the early part of the story it begins with a guy named Rainsford who was riding in a boat. A fellow traveler was on the boat with him and they were having a conversation. They were talking about the island they passed by. The island was dressed in unfounded rumors. Noises Rainsford heard were odd that night. He got up out his bed and went to check them and he accidently falls overboard. He was not able to climb back on the boat. In 1932, RKO released a movie of the story titled the same “Most Dangerous Game”.

In the story “ The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the setting is essential for the plot to be believable. For example, the setting has to be an isolated island. The setting must be an island in the middle of nowhere or else the general’s prey could get away. As Rainsford is running away from Zaroff’s chateau he is thinking “ He was in a picture with a frame of water, and his operations, clearly, must take place within that frame”(11). Rainsford is trapped on this island, with nowhere to go. In another setting, on a mainland for example, Rainsford could just keep on running until he hit civilization. The setting must be somewhere for prisoners to get trapped. Another reason is that the setting has to have a way of stranding General

They most significant difference in the film compared to the short story is how long both Rainsford and Zaroff hunt for. In the short story, The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford and Zaroff were talking about how many days there will be in the game. General Zaroff’s game is different in the film, as the story’s version was, “‘If [his] quarry eludes [him] for three whole days, [the quarry] wins the game.’” The filmmakers made the game only one day. This probably happened because they wanted to keep the film exciting and not show the boring parts. The article, “Good book, Bad Movie,” states one reason why directors change the plot of a book when making its film is not having enough time in the movie. In many films that are based off books or stories,

The illuminated moon opened up the night. It was shining bright down on the unconscious General. That night Rainsford had thrown him out the window, attempting to kill him, but with Zaroff’s success, did not. At first glance, a person could conclude Zaroff was dead, but from a first-person view, any man can see he was slowly with a light heart moving.