Introduction
1. Following the grounding of the MV Rena on Otaiti/Astrolable Reef (“the Reef”), in the Bay of Plenty, its owners Daina Shipping Company established a trust entity - the Astrolable Community Trust (the Applicant), to lodge an application for resource consent pursuant to sections 15A and 15B of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the RMA) to the Bay of Plenty Regional Council (the Council). The applicant seeks consents to abandon the remains and associated debris of the wreck in place on the seabed (S15A), and to authorise any potential future discharge of contaminants from the degradation of the wreckage (S15B).
2. Upon submission of this application to the Council, the Proposal was publicly notified and generated a significant response from the local community – variety of responses ranging from those supporting the proposal, to those opposing and some in neutral .
3. Of particular significance is the number of opposing submissions that were submitted which the Council and its reporting planner noted were a total of 101 submissions out of 151 valid submissions submitted . Arguably this is a significant number of submissions indicating high levels of concerns the community has in regards to this Proposal, and although the community may not be experts on this matter they are however, are the ones living and breathing in the Bay of Plenty. As such their evidence deserves appropriate weight.
4. These legal submissions and the evidence that will be presented
In fact in 2013, the Abbot government approved a plan to dump 3 cubic metres of Abbot Port’s waste inside the reef’s waters. The very weight of UNESCO’s word is enough to persuade Australia’s government.
The aim of this report is to investigate Long Reef and Collaroy Beach’s coastal management.
* Charlene Simpson is a member of the County Council’s Land Use Committee but did not show up during the meeting when the amendment has been approved. She is historically known as a fervent ‘’no-growther’’ and the expansion of the Urban Area could be seen as a threat to her ideals, since she sees development and new jobs as evil. Despite she didn’t show any preference before, she will probably vote against the amendments.
Australia is in debt, as the reef itself have brought economic and environmental stability. The Reef at port douglas
Because the GBR is such a highly visited tourist attraction for snorkeling and diving, there has been a large number of human structures that have been built in natural areas. Every five years, the Australian government publishes an Outlook Report that examines the Great Barrier Reef’s health, pressures, and likely future. “The report is required under Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 (section 54) and aims to provide a regular and reliable means of assessing reef health and management in an accountable and transparent way.” The report shows the actions that have been taken since 2009, including the focus on improving the quality of water that runs off the land. The increased freshwater run-off is in direct relation to the coastal development that has occurred since the major bleaching events have begun. The report released in 2009, states that the greatest risks to the Reef are still climate change, land-based runoff, coastal development, and some remaining impacts of fishing and illegal fishing and poaching. The report points out climate change as being the main cause of the destruction or bleaching of the reef (Department of Environment and Energy 2017). Most observers conclude that the climate change is a direct result of human
This report analyses the altercation between Norvik Industry 's ( a building company), Water Corporation and Adrian and Linda Webb who are owners of a block of land on Flagstaff Crescent in Secret Harbour
Analysis of the attached proposal reveals that it partially satisfies the government standard form for solicitation. The attached proposal satisfies some of the requirements of the government's standard form for solicitation, which include:
The issue surrounding the Western Australian shark cull initiative will be the central topic of discussion in this critical essay. A rise in shark attacks in recent years has caused the Western Australian government to employ the Department Of Fisheries Western Australia to pursue a systematic and regulated cull of sharks. However the Greens – who are a political party and pressure group – are advocating for this cull to be stopped through lobbying.
The topic I have chosen for the assignment is the human impacts that are placed on the beaches and coast of Warrnambool, namely areas around the Merri Island Sanctuary. This also incorporates locations including Stingray bay, the breakwater, Shelly beach and Middle Island.
The human impact on the reef has caused a lot of damage and so in 1971 the City of Onkaparinga, State Government, Coast care groups and environmental organisations all had supported a decision to protect the reef. So the reef has now a reserved part which is protected and separated from the one open to tourists. The positive effect of human intervention has been creating this 300 ha of aquatic reserve to safe
A task that was assigned to me was to review the environmental requirements for policies and regulations associated with international, national, and local ballast water management regulations to determine applicability to Navy ships. Most of the work associated with this task was associated with examining the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) documents prior to and after the IMO meetings. The IMO MEPC documents from the 67th and 68th sessions were analyzed for environmental
I am pleased to share my concerns, analysis and recommendation about the Merseyside Project with you. Your DCF analysis is excellent and helpful. However, I have to make some changes to it. The memo will be divided into 6 parts.
• Researched information informs the design; with guidelines/constraints, such as Local Authority and Conservation Policy (A9), along with specialist consultant’s reports – including Day
However, many fisherman are unable to catch as many fish as they used to, so they are increasingly using cyanide and dynamite in fishing, which further degrades the coral reef ecosystem.[6] This perpetuation of bad habits simply leads to the further decline of coral reefs and therefore perpetuating the problem. One solution to stopping this cycle is to educate the local community about why conservation of marine spaces that include coral reefs is important.[7] Once the local communities understand the personal stakes at risk then they will actually fight to preserve the reefs. Conserving coral reefs has many economic, social, and ecological benefits, not only for the people who live on these islands, but for people throughout the world as well.
The paramount objective of the agreement is to stabilize GHG atmospheric concentrations at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Avoiding dangerous interference is therefore the key benchmark for all action, commitments and programmes agreed under the convention and its auspices. Determining what is dangerous is left to political judgements made in light of scientific findings, economic and societal concerns. Thus advocacy for action to conserve coral reefs need to cover all these areas, and not just the troubling responses of reefs to increased GHG concentrations.