Essay on The Myth of Prometheus and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

In this essay I will be discussing who really is portrayed as the monster in her gothic horror novel, Frankenstein or “The Modern Prometheus”. Frankenstein was written in 1816, (thought by many to be the first real science fiction novel) during the age of Romanticism and it tells the story of a selfish man, Victor Frankenstein, whose ambition conducts him to seek for supernatural powers and leads him to death. He is a young scientist, eager to discover something new, the key to life, help to make scientific advances and let other scientists get a better idea of how the body works and who after studying chemical processes and the decay of living beings, gains an insight into the creation of like, leading him to create a monster that becomes

What do a god and a crazy doctor have in common? Nothing right! Wrong! In the stories Prometheus and Frankenstein the protagonists are very alike in many ways. They both tried to play god, steal, and they both get punished for what they did.

There are evident similarities between Victor Frankenstein and his creation. Both Frankenstein and his creation share a love for nature, a longing for knowledge, and a desire for companionship.

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is subtitled "The Modern Prometheus", and rightfully so. Prometheus, the Titan of Greek mythology that created man and gave them fire, is a fitting symbol for Victor Frankenstein, the man who created a "monster" and gave him life. The most obvious aspect of the similarity between Frankenstein and the Prometheus myth is the underlying theme - both stories deal with ill-fated actions with tragic consequences. The classic Prometheus stories, as told by Aeschylus, Percy Bysshe Shelley and summarized by Edith Hamilton, contain symbolic and thematic elements that closely parallel Mary Shelley's "modern Prometheus."

Frankenstein is characterised as the modern Prometheus in the subtitle of his novel but Prometheus brought fire and light (civilisation) to his creation and in doing so, turned his back against the gods. He suffered for his sacrifice by being chained to a rock and had his liver eaten by an eagle. For Prometheus and his creation fire was a blessing and enabled humanity to develop and break free of the gods. Like Prometheus, Frankenstein "steals from heaven in attempting to Œpour a torrent of light into our dark world'" (Shelley in Boyd 1984, p. 24) and is punished because of his actions. Shelley also contrasts Frankenstein with the Promethean myth. Her Prometheus brings only suffering into the world, his creation suffers, his family suffers and ultimately, he suffers. Frankenstein's

This story tells that Prometheus was tasked with creating mankind and he would take from the gods and give to mankind and get punished for doing so. Victor Frankenstein is like prometheus in a way that he created a living being using formerly alive people and then realizes all of the trouble that causes him to get into. Frankenstein is so obsessed with his creation that he risked everything for it similar to how Prometheus risked everything by taking from the gods to mankind. Frankenstein’s punishment he received for his creation was the loss of every person in his life that he cared about. The reader can link these similarities to help them better understand the plot line.

Victor Frankenstein can indeed be seen as the modern Prometheus, by defying the gods and creating life, Victor puts himself in God's place and becomes

Frankenstein is a novel about a mad scientist named Victor Frankenstein creating a monster. The novel depicts Victor as the protagonist and the monster, who will be addressed as Promotes, is depicted as the antagonist. However, their personality and reactions say otherwise. Ruth Cristina Hernández Ching composed an article addressing that the protagonist, or Victor, is the true anti-hero and Prometheus is the hero. Victor and Prometheus fulfill their roles of anti-hero and hero by their relationships and relationships.

My thought on this comes mostly from the subtitle, The Modern Prometheus. It makes sense to me because Prometheus was a demigod, one of the Titans, and thought he knew better than Zeus who believed that man was not ready for the gift of fire. Prometheus went beyond his station and disobeyed the King of Gods to return fire to the earth. He was brutally tortured as punishment until Hercules saved him. Victor Frankenstein acts as Prometheus, going against higher powers to reach his goal. His desire is fulfilled and ends horribly, leaving Frankenstein tortured and despaired over the death his actions caused. Also, as a little tidbit, Prometheus was associated with science and culture which makes him and Frankenstein even more similar. Nature could be considered Zeus in this situation because it is the one being tricked and made a mockery of. Robert Walton would be Frankenstein's Hercules since he rescued Frankenstein from his torment.

The one significant difference between Victor Frankenstein and Prometheus are their relationships with their creations. Frankenstein has little to no positive relationship with his creation. “I rushed out of the room and continued a long time traversing my bed-chamber, unable to compose my mind to sleep.” (Shelley 5.3). This beginning of the end of the relationship

Some people see Frankenstein and his creature as complete opposites, but they are not as different as they may seem. Victor and his creature have no mother figure in the novel. Victor’s mother was there for Victor in the beginning but “resigned cheerfully to death… she died calmly” (Shelley 53), whereas the creature was born without one. Therefore, throughout the novel, both Victor and the creature have to depend on their fathers for guidance. Frankenstein and the creature are both intelligent. Frankenstein gains his intelligence through his schooling and experience, while the creature gains intelligence through observations, experience, and “Paradise Lost, a volume of Plutarch’s Lives, and the Sorrows of Werter” (Shelley 155). These characters want to be accepted in the world. Frankenstein wants to be accepted in the

In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein there are several parallels that can be drawn. One of the major parallels in the novel is the connection between Victor Frankenstein and the creature he creates; there is an interesting relationship between these two characters. Frankenstein and his creation are not blood related, however, their similarities bond the two. Despite their dislike for one another and their physical differences Frankenstein shares many characteristics with his creation, throughout the novel we see each of them find comfort in nature, become isolated from society, and seek revenge towards those who have wronged them. There is significance in these similarities; if Frankenstein’s creation had not been physically deformed they would

Nineteen-year-old Mary Shelley didn’t know when she began it that her “ghost story” would become an enduring part of classic literature. Frankenstein is an admirable work simply for its captivating plot. To the careful reader, however, Shelley’s tale offers complex insights into human experience. The reader identifies with all of the major characters and is left to heed or ignore the cautions that their situations provide. Shelley uses the second person narrative style, allusions both to Coleridge’s “Rime of the Ancient Mariner” and the legend of Prometheus, and the symbols of both light and fire to warn against the destructive thirst for forbidden knowledge.

Did Mary Shelley initially title her work about Victor Frankenstein and his creation The Modern Prometheus solely because of the glaring similarities between their stories? That is a question that is often discussed, but a conclusion rarely arrives. One of the possible reasons for this could be because there are many different interpretations of the Promethean myth, which are mainly based on the ambiguous nature of the story. The parallels between the Promethean myth and Frankenstein are obvious, and that, in combination with her subtitle, The Modern Prometheus, indicates that Mary Shelley did have the myth in mind as she wrote the story.