The Nature Of Photography As An Art Form Of Art

Early Landscape photography used the same principles as painters in order to create pieces of art. Before the 18th Century, artists used landscapes as backdrops and as a frame for the principal subject. Towards the later part of the century, however, artists such as Nicolas Poussin started to romanticize the environment, instead using it as a principle subject in paintings.

A photograph is a powerful tool for life. A single, unchanged image of reality can be utilized for a variety of situations. For one, one photograph could decide the lifestyle in the foreseeable future of a person that committed a crime. Furthermore, one photograph could reveal the horrors of a particular event. On another note, one photograph could hold heartwarming memories forever. In addition, one photograph could stir a controversy that will have people debating whether an entity is real or not. Overall, as Susan Sontag mentions in her book Photograph, “Photographs furnish evidence.”(Sontag); in other words, whether if it is, good, bad, or misinterpreted, one photograph can be used as evidence that something in fact happened or is real.

The photograph is a very powerful medium. The French painter Paul Delaroche exclaimed upon seeing an early photograph “from now on, painting is dead!” (Sayre, 2000). Many critics did not take photography seriously as a legitimate art form until the 20th century. With the

Until now, photography has a profound influence on paintings ever since optical devices were introduced in the art society. However, the concept of photography influencing painting has been very controversial. While some artist appreciates the development of photography and embraces the impact towards their own works,

I feel as if we have asked the question, “Is photography an art?” and “Can photography be considered a type of language?” many times in this quarter and we still cannot get a direct answer. Additionally, the truth of the matter is that we will never really know if it is because people have different opinions of what is art. For instance, in “Literacy and Picturacy,” Heffernan explains that there is something real behind every photograph. He explains that photographs allows to see the story that is being told instead of simply reading it. Earlier in the quarter we also read “On photography” in which Barthes claims that photography is not an art because it is simply an imitation of reality. In other words, he is saying that photography is just

Photographers involved in this technique look at photography as more of a true artistic impression than as anything else. The argument compares an artist using brush, paint and canvas to create a work of art, while the photographers use a camera, film to do the same.They see the camera as a tool, like a paint brush that is used in the creation of art.

Art is delivered and delighted in by numerous individuals for some causes. Something that art does is stretch and build up our common aggregate photographic dialect. At the point when new visual thoughts are initially exhibited by the craftsman, they are regularly seen as stunning, and maybe even as unimaginable.

“Like money and other commodities, photographs shift and slide in meaning. They may seem to offer solid evidence that objects and people exist, but do they guarantee what such things mean? The lesson of the photograph... was that meanings are not fixed, that values cannot be taken for granted, that what an image shows depends on how and where and when, and by whom it is seen.” (Trachtenberg, 19-20)

In Roger Scruton's Photography and Representation the author establishes the idea that ideal photography is not art. In the same breath he says that ideal photography is not necessarily an idea which photographers should strive, nor does it necessarily exist. Yet, he bases his argument upon the ideal. In reviewing his paper, I’ll take a look at why he painstakingly tries to make this distinction between ideal painting and ideal photography. His argument is based upon the proposition that photographs can only represent in a causal fashion, whereas painters create representational artwork via intentional relations. Scruton manages to create a solid argument, but in the end I’ll decide it is not a fair assumption to say that photographs

Painting and drawing—probably one of the highest acknowledged forms of art—incorporates all aspects of the need to create. The artwork can be produced simply for the desire to create, whether it is just the study of the human body or the recreation of nature through the various colors, textures and the styles available to the artist. Nature, commonly reflected in paintings, serves as a great source of

A portrait in art as we know is an artist’s representation of another person or one’s self, in which the face is the main subject matter. As one of the most widely used forms of art adopted by painters, sculptures and photographers, at some point in our lives we have all had our portrait taken either it being in a photographic studio, sat for a fine artist or in your local post office in the passport photo booth. The photographic portrait is a paradox of everlasting contradictions and whether identity is really fixed within portraiture is an endless debate, leaving the viewer with open ended questions rather than a sense of truth and identity portrayed in a photograph. Whether portraits are simply a documentation of someone’s existences

Personally, I have always felt diverted by the way that an artist applies different techniques to express their emotions. For instance, a blue sky can either generate depression, faith, or confidence. An artist usually conveys a message through their work of art. The concept of literacy can be intriguing a few may be literate in academic subjects such as Math and English, but every person is diverse, for many people have different forms of learning. The two essential points of literacy are to tell a story and to convince your professors that you comprehend the material being taught. Considering art is a form of literature that tells a story through colors and patterns, I have found that art is my form of literacy.

The camera is a means of recording an image, and is a tool just like brushes and palette knives. It is the user that converts the image into art and the viewer (be it a judge or not) who determines if it is to their liking or not.

Photography has been around for many years. In the time that the first camera was invented to present day, various styles of photography have evolved. Two types of photography that are very common today are street and nature or landscape photography. Although these styles of photography have many similarities, they have some differences as well. The subject, camera equipment, and location are three major differences in these styles.

Photography as a form of art is a controversial topic for numerous reasons. There are lot of different warring opinions when it comes to the legitimacy of photography as an art form. Photography is a very delicate matter considering that photography breaks a lot of the normal rules of aesthetics and is such an easy medium to create through, which can be both good and bad.