The Necessity Of Writing In Stephen King's On Writing

Flower believes that a competent writer must achieve to close the gap between themselves and the reader. The writer cannot close on themselves because they must reach their own knowledge. The writer determines the reader’s needs are by adapting to the reader’s “language” and knowledge on particular subjects. In addition, the writer must contextualize to help solve a problem or to develop an opinion. In essence, the writer has to suite the reader's attitude and knowledge for them to create an imagine of what the writer’s overall meaning and lesson.

Based on his argument using a piece of story from his past, the writer conceptually supported his explanatory point of views on how skills can be developed with a passion of understanding the writer’s intention. I believe that the writer of this article addressed fundamental thoughts that should be useful in the process of reading as a writer, and on how to become a better writer.

According to King, there are two kinds of writing, bad reading, and good writing. Reading frequently offer you opportunity to avoid bad prose when you are writing, an example of Nobel like Asteroid Miners, and so many more. On the others hand you have, it helps you to learn about the style, the graceful narration, plot development, the creation of believable characters, and truth-telling. This paragraph is teaching us that, to do something great, we need to put work on

To read is to feel connected; to feel as though we are not alone, each of us read for a different purpose. Just like reading authors have a purpose for writing. The purpose behind Elie Wiesel novel “Night” is the duty he felt as a survivor, he felt as though he was a messenger and needed to tell the world about this catastrophe. There are many aspects that make a novel good and bad, each is determined by the details given by the author, but also the lack of detail can make a novel feel as if it’s bad because it leaves us hanging; wanting for more. There is always a way the author can make their novel better, just like with everything there’s always room for improvement.

By asking this King has readers desiring to change their ways, or at least take a stand on the topic. Through his use of rhetorical questioning King makes his audience feel the familiar pang of missed opportunity. This regret emotionally ties readers to the text, thus drawing in their support to King’s argument that television is corruptive to reading and writing

Authors use literary elements and techniques as tools to convey meaning. These devices are the means by which authors bring richness and clarity to a text. They express moods or feelings that allow the reader to connect with the writing. In On Writing, the author, Stephen King makes use of literary elements to tell his story. The techniques King uses are effective in portraying vivid images and feelings in the reader’s mind.

On the other hand, writing can turn ugly if they don’t care about what words they use and rush through the writing process. The idea is that ugly writing impedes communication whereas positive writing allows for clear communication. Positive writing serves the purpose of communicating clearly and concisely. It allows for the flow of imagery from the writer to the reader. In contrast, ugly writing does something else. It can be crowded with meaningless phrases and fillers. People need to prevent bad habits from spreading by consciously guarding against them.

He uses rhetorical questions, that the reader can then answer in their minds; he also tells many vivid stories with details and imagery to engage the reader’s emotions and imagination in order to create a more relatable story. For example, in passage 24, King tells the story of how he fell in love with Tabitha and talks about their differing backgrounds with religions, but how they came from similar working class families. Despite the fact that they came from different religions, they were strongly tied with words, language, and the work of their lives. “I fell in love with her partly because I understood what she was doing with her work. I fell because she understood what she was doing with it” (King, pg 62). This supports his larger argument that writing is not only to better yourself, but to help other people better themselves and find someone who inspires you to pursue your venture to becoming your best self. He inserts a poem that Tabitha had read aloud to the workshop that they both attended to once or twice a week, where after he realizes that she has the same views

Our group established 5 criterions to state what makes great literature. Our first criterion was “A great book must contain a message that applies to not only those who have experienced situations in the book, but provide perspective to those who have not.” A message that can be understood by numerous groups of people is vital to a great piece of literature. Our second criterion is that in order to teach a lesson it must expose a fault in human nature or in society. Our society is just as flawed as humanity is. Acknowledging these flaws is the first step in overcoming the trials of society and man. Our third criterion is centered around the craftsmanship of the literary work. This can apply to a groundbreaking new approach to narration. Or even complex characters and a unique and individual style (Faulkner.) In summary, the 3rd criterion tries to move past just the message itself, and to focus on

These

He explains what things he himself appropriates in his writing and things he chooses to avoid. He talks about using appropriate vocabulary, which is usually always the first word that comes to mind, stresses why a writer should never use adverbs, of which he loathes, and provides examples of what he believes to be good and bad writing and why. When he describes what he believes to be good writing, he does not reference modern day writing masterpieces or award winning pieces, he simply is describing work that is proficient, readable, and maybe even publishable. He describes two key components to ‘good writing’, these are to have a good understanding of the fundamentals, and to use the correct apparatus (142). These criteria cannot make a bad writer good or a good writer great, but it can make good writers out of merely competent writers (145). King urges writers to write what they know, not only in their minds but in their hearts and imaginations

Description is a key component in writing an essay. In the book, King tells us that creating a good writer out of a decent writer is all possible as long as the writer practices fundamentals and a huge fundamental is being able to be descriptive. Staring an essay you must be able to use words that can grab the readers attention and make them want to read more. Using strong adjectives as in humungous, majestic, and extravagant are a big way to grab attention to the audience. King teaches us practicing being descriptive will help us become an overall better

Stephen King gives many tips about becoming a skilled writer throughout On Writing : A Memoir of the Craft. He takes the reader through his life from a young age and through all the ups and downs ; he shares how hard getting to be a well known writer is. King talks about a toolbox that his uncle made him help carry, then describes his “writers toolbox” as a set of skills needed to write. He says that you need to take care of this figurative toolbox just as you would take care of normal tools, making sure you are keeping the tools clean, by using them often and expanding them. He says that mental toolboxes are the same as a real toolbox, with many layers.

Notably, Stephen King writes, “I read because I like to read.” He goes on to talk about how he does not read fiction to study the art; he reads it because he enjoys it. Making a great point, Stephen shares that although you are learning during each book you read, especially the bad ones. When you read a bad

These