The Necklace Essay

The story intially takes place at a ball that Madame Louisel has been invited to by her husband. In the beginning of the story Madame is very indecisive about making an appearance at the ball. She complained she did not have a dress, any jewels, and she was scared she would look like a "pauper"(174). She did not want to look poor around a bunch of rich woman, so she had asked a friend for a piece of jewelry to wear for the night. Excited, she picks out the diamond necklace that seemed to stand out to her. She adored it. The narrator describes it as "lovliest of all, elegant, smiling, and radiating with joy"(175). Having a blast at the party, dancing, drinking, and not thinking about anything else, Madame left the ball around four in the morning. Calling a cab, Madame and her husband were on their way home, delighted with the fun night that they had. Finally arriving at home, they begin to get into comfortable clothes when suddenly Madame notices that the diamond necklace she had borrowed from a friend for the night had gone missing. Searching everyhwere

Also by touching something with this said influenza virus such as shaking hands with someone who has the flu and then touching or holding your mouth, nose or eyes. Viruses like the influenza can live for 2 hours or even longer on surfaces like tables, handles, and chairs.

But later in the story her discontentment caused her to terrible problem and sealed her fate. The necklace of Madame Forestier has been lost. It is her discontent that caused her to borrow the necklace which she lost. But it is an irony of fate that Mathilde and her husband faced 10 years of hardship for nothing but a fake necklace which cost “at most only five hundred francs.” (6) For this necklace they repaid a debt of “thirty-six thousand francs.” (5) If Mathilde and her husband had admitted to Madame Forestier about the truth of losing the necklace then the consequences would have been different and they would have avoided the hardship. This relates with another morality of the story which is to tell the truth.

Madame Loisel’s husband says, “I’m going to go retrace the whole distance we covered on foot and see if I can’t find it.” While her husband went looking for the necklace, in the cold, she stayed home and thought of where it could be and never offered to go help find the necklace that she lost. When her husband went to the police station, they sent out a missing necklace sign or poster to see if anyone would bring it back and no one did. They wrote a letter to her friend saying they were sorry and will pay her back for the necklace and then they started to work hard to pay back all debt and buy a new

when she hears of her husband’s death. Although she is not stuck as many women would have

Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she

The necklace serves as a symbol for greed. When Mathilda Loisel loses the necklace that she believed was worth forty thousand francs, she desperately retraces her steps and gets her husband to help her find it as well. It ends up taking ten years to pay off the debt. The ten years were hard on Mathilda Loisel and her husband, and Maupassant told the reader that she “looked old now… with hair half combed, with skirts award, and reddened hands” (6). However, even after the long ten years of manual labor all because she lost the necklace, she “sat down near the window and though of that evening at the ball so long ago, when she has been so beautiful and so admired” (6). The necklace symbolizes that when greed controls emotions and decisions, it never leads to good results.

From her peripheral vision, she witnessed her husband grasping onto the deep pockets of his coat and the pained expression escaping Loisel’s emotionless face. She had to find the necklace immediately, for revealing to Madame Forestier that she had lost the necklace was not an option. As Madame Loisel sauntered around, she caught a glimpse of the Minister and his wife standing in the blistering night. There were two valuable pieces of jewelry hanging from the neck of the Minister’s wife.

In the short story, “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, a poor woman named Mathilde receives an invitation to a formal party at a mansion. When she realizes that she has nothing to go in, she and her husband spend their savings to buy a dress, and she borrows a diamond necklace from a wealthy friend. Mathilde attends the party and has a wonderful time, but upon returning home she discovers that the necklace is missing. The couple buys a replacement, needing to work ten years to pay for it. After they finally pay it off, they discover that the original necklace wasn’t real diamond, and only worth 500 francs. One example of conflict in the story occurs when Mathilde first opens her invitation. She wants to attend the party more than anything,

“She was one of those pretty and charming girls, born, as if by an accident into a family of clerks” this is what Guy de Maupassant started “The Necklace” off by saying (Maupassant 221). Also, this helps describe the main character and to give the readers a visual of Mathilde Loisel. “The Necklace” is a short story that Mathilde Loisel, the main female character, wants to be a higher class than she really is. Mathilde’s life drastically changes one night after she loses the necklace. Guy de Maupassant incorporates his use of the social class into the short story.

In the short story The Necklace, Madame Loisel is a dynamic character, meaning, over the course of the story, her character changes drastically. In the beginning of the story, Madame Loisel is an extremely materialistic person who is dissatisfied with her life due to her social position, leaving her to be miserable with her dwelling condition and constantly fantasizing of the riches she does not possess. Her character can be concluded from the following text from paragraph 3, “Mathilde suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born to enjoy all delicacies and all luxuries. She was distressed at the poverty of her dwelling, at the bareness of the walls, at the shabby chairs, the ugliness of the curtains. All those things, of which another woman

A contract is a written or spoken agreement between two or more parties that involves the exchange of two promises, which is intended to be enforceable by law. The four basic elements are the offer, consideration, acceptance, and mutuality. When elements are broken down individually, each one is just as important as the next. If one of these elements are broken or misunderstood, it could mean result in the contractual agreement becoming not valid and end in lawsuit. The overall purpose of the contract is for legal purpose and to keep a order within an agreement.

Imagine someone being at a sales stand looking for something stunning, browsing through the beautiful selection of diamonds and gems. In the corner of her eye, she sees one of the most dazzling piece of jewelry ever made. The woman automatically grabs and buys the necklace with joy thinking of how amazing she will look. This moment is how Mathilde felt in the text, “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. But sometimes good things come to an end and this, unfortunately, is one of those times.

Violence against women and girls is internationally prevalent. Regardless of class, age, or race, women everywhere are subject to physical, sexual, psychological, and economic aggression (United Nations, 2015; 1). According to the World Health organization, 1 in 3 women will experience physical and/or sexual violence by a partner a non-partner. Moreover, studies conducted by the World Health Organization suggest that exposure to violent behavior can have detrimental impacts that can affect the physical, mental, and emotional health of a woman or girl; some instances of extreme violence also lead to death. Due to the epidemic of gender-based homicides, the term ‘femicide’ became apparent. The term ‘femicide’ was coined by a woman named Carol Orlock, but was later defined in 2001 by an expert on violence against women and girls, Diana E. H. Russell. Femicide, as Diana defines it, is "the killing of females by males because they are female”. Presented by the World Health Organization, the main types and prevalence of femicide are intimate femicide, murders in the name of ‘honor’, dowry-related femicide, and non-intimate femicide (Garcia-Moreno, Guedes and Knerr, 2012; 1-2). Indeed, the forms of femicide existing vary among all cultures internationally, however, in this paper; I will primarily focus on non-intimate femicide in the region of Ciudad Juarez.

In today's world what we wear and how we present ourselves can say a lot about who we are and the stories we can tell. Without speaking a word to another person someone could decipher many things about me based on a necklace that I wear. My necklace could reveal many different aspects of who I am. it could reveal that I am close with my family. It could also be determined that I value the sentimental value over the monetary value. As a gift from my grandmother I have many personal attachments to this necklace, it will allow people to think certain things about me, and it can reveal a lot about who I am; but there are also things that it doesn't show.