The Need For Gun Control in America Essay

The second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Since December 15, 1971 people in America have had the right to bear arms, today that amendment is

Today in America we face many controversial problems. With strict gun control, Americans cannot feel safe, and to some the thought of not being able to use a firearm in self-defense is very frightening. We Americans should never have to be in fear of not being able to protect ourselves, especially in the comfort of our own home. How are strict gun control laws and regulations going to reach the estimated 65 million gun owners that own approximately 240 million firearms (Just Facts Gun Control)? The answer is simple, they can’t. There must be an end to gun control, its problems significantly outweigh any good intentions it has, and besides there is no doubt about it, America is a safer place when the citizens are able to own firearms.

The Second Amendment States, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be

The American Constitution and the Bill of Rights are amazing documents in their wording. Its writers showed astonishing foresight in some ways, and understanding that they could not accurately predict the future in others. These documents grant specific and vague powers to different departments of the Federal Government. The wording allows for changes to be made in its content and interpretation. One example of all these qualities, is the Second Amendment, and its interpretation has caused heated debate in recent years.

The second amendment states that, “A well-controlled militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to own arms, shall not be infringed.”

Including the ban of devices that simulate full auto and ban high capacity magazines, although fully automatic firearms made after 1986 are banned in the USA it is still possible to obtain devices such as bump fire stocks that use the recoil of the gun to re-pull the trigger after each shot, this simulates a fully automatic machine gun. A bump fire stock was used in a mass shooting that took place in las vegas in 2017 which killed 58 people and injured 546 people, the bump fire stock used combined with high capacity magazines is what made this incident particularly devastating. High capacity magazines are a magazine designed to hold above than the standard amount of rounds, an “assault rifle” holds 25 to 30 rounds while a pistol holds 10 to 15 rounds, however, most countries consider any magazine holding more than 10 rounds a high capacity magazine.These must be banned for the reason that they allow you to fire more rounds quicker without having to reload which would give law enforcement or a bystander more time to stop the suspect before the situation worsens.These limitations would help the US not only by saving lives but also by satisfying the people who have fought for these

Often, horrible gun-related crimes are committed by people who do not value human life, which translates to mental issues. In these type cases, it makes no difference how many laws are on the books because if a mentally deranged person is determined to secure a gun to carry out his or her plan, a gun is

The effectiveness within current gun policies in the United States of America have undeniably evoked debate, as the number of gun-inflicted fatalities continues to increase each year. An issue with such weight on a nation, has been regarded as being treated frivolously inside the United States, as many citizens query the degree of action that has been made to end this growing topic. The stance of enforcing stricter gun laws within the United States, such as limiting who may carry firearms by requiring background checks for all gun sales, has been argued by many. For many Americans, gun control can be regarded as either being the solution to reducing gun violence, or a complete violation to their Second Amendment. For an issue like gun control, that could possibly impact an entire nation, partiality becomes easily entangled in discussions that surround the topic. News sources inside the United States, such as The New York Times, as well as certain foreign news sources, such as Al Jazeera, employs data to support a particular position, rather than personal opinion. When analyzing certain sources from foreign countries, such as Pravda, and their account on the United States’ growing gun concern, there is an undeniable degree of extreme dogmatism surrounding the approach in solving gun-induced violence.

     The Second Amendment to the United States constitution states “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(U.S. Constitution). The founding fathers included this in our bill of rights because they feared the federal government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend

Every law-abiding American citizen should have a choice to own a gun, and it should not matter if their reason is for protection, for sport or simply to collect. Gun control is a concern that needs to be one of “less talk and more action”; in addition, it needs to be an issue where both parts of the Congress join together to find a solution to the growing problem of gun violence in the United States. Furthermore, the American people need to demand action from their state’s senators and representatives, not just during a time of stress following a gun-related incident, but continue to press until a permanent resolution is found. Gun control is a controversial subject because there are many who still believe it is all about the government taking away all guns, however, “Gun control” is an umbrella term for several types of gun regulations. Gun control calls for “common sense measures” such as banning “military-style weapons” and “universal background checks” (Should More Gun, 2016). There are federal laws covering some aspects of gun control, but many contain loopholes (Perez-Pena, 2015). Most states have their own laws in place, however, there are no consistencies “at the state level” (Perez-Pena, 2015). In the late 1990’s, there were in fact, roughly 20,000 federal, state or local laws covering gun control; the bulk of these laws were local codes (Spitzer, 1998). In a survey conducted in February 2013, by the Pew Research Center, it was determined that “37% of adults

Gun control has become a very important topic within the United States after the past couple of months. There have been many issues that have occurred to make people think that banning guns is something we need to invest in, even though that just would not be the greatest option. There are many parts to winning a debate on gun control. One always needs to be sure to view both sides of the issue, look at the causes and the effects of the issue, and being sure one has enough facts and statistics to back up any information used. Given the research and studies conducted on the idea of gun control, there is enough evidence to show that gun control would not work and would badly damage the societal structure of the United States.

The topic of gun control in the United states is a very controversial and debatable one. Some individuals are for the use of guns and protect the Second Amendment (the right to keep and bear arms), while others are completely against anything having to do with guns. I believe that a person should have the right to purchase a gun not only because it is our constitutional right to do so, but also because it is a form of protection for oneself and for families. Personally, I am pro-gun. I would much rather protect myself during a life or death situation than to be left defenseless and victimized. With that being said, I believe that the process in which individuals go through to obtain a gun should be more strictly enforced. Most of the crimes and mass shootings in the news today stem from individuals who have obtained guns illegally or without being registered, who are not psychologically stable, or who have fallen through the cracks of the system and have been overlooked as a threat to our society. For these reasons, I believe that we as a nation need stricter gun control laws in order to decrease the horrifying events that are happening in today’s society. We must enforce stricter screenings, psychological evaluations, and requirements for individuals, regulate what kind of guns get sold to the general population, and set into place a reporting system for the misuse of guns around the country. I believe that by reinforcing these

The Second Amendment, written in 1791, firearm control is a transcendent divisive matter in cutting edge American society.From one perspective, gunfire attests an unfaltering, each day toll of American lives, from suicide and accidents impressively more than from unpleasant wrongdoing.Consistently, a mass executioner, as often as possible furnished with one or more self-loader military-sort snare weapons, chops down twelve or so setbacks. On the other hand, weapon proprietorship is an inside worth to a colossal number of Americans, and perhaps a lion 's offer of each and every American family unit have no short of what one gun. Most need a weapon as security against the very violence of our streets. To some of these gun proprietors, furthermore, their privilege to their weapons is treasured in the Bill of Rights.

Gun control is a highly controversial topic in the United States. There are many people who are for gun control - people who want to have stricter laws to make it so criminals and other dangerous people can’t obtain a firearm. But, there are also the people who disagree with gun control laws and believe there should be a more lenient gun control to help people defend themselves during risky situations. Many gun control laws have been passed for many years. While many have been passed, many have been voted unconstitutional meaning they affect the citizens second amendment rights. The Second Amendment of The United States Constitution states, “[a] well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." America is the most well-armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about 270 million of the world’s 875 million firearms (Marshall). This is more than a quarter of the world’s registered firearms. The reason why Americans own so many guns is because of the Second Amendment which grants that right. Although the Second Amendment prevents the federal government from completely banning guns in America, limited restrictions are allowed on the distribution and possession of firearms. Certain groups of people such as criminals, the mentally unstable, and soldiers dishonorably discharged from the military are prohibited from possessing or interacting with firearms

Mass Shootings have increased in America over the past 20 years. Innocent bystanders and civilians are the victims of a shooting rampage caused by one or more suspects. On October 1, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada a man by the name of the of Stephen Paddock opened fire on concertgoers at the Route 91 Harvest. He fired thousands of rounds in just a matter of minutes using high powered advanced tech military grade weapons. After the shooting the uproar about the ability to purchase such high-powered weapons arose again and citizens called for gun laws to be revised. The semi-automatic weapons can now be altered to function as a fully automatic weapon. Assault rifles should only be permitted for the use in war combat only. Non-military personnel should have the right to own an assault rifle. In an article titled “Disarming the